• Fri
  • Aug 29, 2014
  • Updated: 5:22pm

Typhoon Haiyan

Typhoon Haiyan, one of the strongest storms ever recorded, struck the Philippines in November 2013 with winds of up to 190 mph (305 kph). At least 10,000 people died in one Philippine province alone.

CommentInsight & Opinion
WHAT THE MAINLAND MEDIA SAY

State media defend China's meagre aid for Philippine typhoon victims

Territorial tensions and US motives in region cited among the justifications for China's meagre aid for storm-hit Philippines

PUBLISHED : Sunday, 17 November, 2013, 3:20am
UPDATED : Sunday, 17 November, 2013, 8:23am

Beijing's initial US$200,000 donation to the typhoon-ravaged Philippines fell far short of both China's economic clout and its ambitions to be a major world player.

Some in the international media saw the meagre donation as a needless slight to a suffering rival - even if Manila has been sparring with Beijing over the sovereignty of the Scarborough Shoal. Typhoon Haiyan killed more than 3,600 Filipinos.

Critics questioned whether China was ready to share the world stage with players such as Australia, Japan and the United States, which pledged US$28 million, US$10 million and US$20 million, respectively.

The US, which has been rebuilding its military ties with the Philippines amid regional territorial disputes, sent an aircraft carrier group to aid in relief efforts.

Faced with the obvious discrepancy in aid, most of the state-controlled Chinese media sprung to the administration's defence. Outlets argued that China's contribution, which included US$100,000 from the Red Cross Society of China, was sufficient in light of the current diplomatic tensions and its ability to divert resources overseas while coping with big problems at home.

"Any donation should be in line with public sentiment in the donor's country as well as its capacity [to donate], and the US$100,000 to the Philippines is a reflection of both," the Legal Daily said. Its editorial said Beijing often showed too much generosity abroad to impress the international community. Many in China might object if Beijing showered aid on Manila.

The Legal Daily cited the ongoing territorial dispute between Beijing and Manila, as well as the Philippines' refusal to provide a satisfactory level of compensation to the families of eight Hong Kong tourists killed during hostage-taking on a tour bus in Manila three years ago.

An online poll conducted by the Global Times, a tabloid published by the People's Daily, said that nearly 92 per cent of the 5,000 internet users surveyed opposed giving more to the Philippines.

An editorial in the Global Times noted that the Philippines had yet to show sufficient restraint over the South China Sea and that Beijing deserved credit for offering any aid at all.

The paper also saw a "strong political motive" behind the United States' generosity, in light of its ongoing "pivot" towards the Asia-Pacific region.

"It's widely known that the Philippines has served as a pawn of the US to make trouble for China in the South China Sea," the paper said. "So the sudden increase in the amount of the donation this time around is a political gesture."

Still, others questioned the wisdom of Beijing's tough love. The online edition of the Beijing Morning Post on Thursday summed up criticism from international media outlets over China's donation, citing warnings that the move might damage China's efforts to build goodwill in the region.

In particular, it called attention to an article in the online edition of Foreign Affairs attributing Beijing's indifference towards the Philippines calamity to the country's policy of trying to isolate its neighbour.

The paper also noted a comparison in The New York Times between the US$1.5 million China gave Pakistan in the aftermath of an earthquake that killed 500 in September.

The online edition of the China Youth Daily cautioned against rushing to condemn Beijing, particularly since the country was still assessing its own damage from Haiyan.

"[Beijing] could still offer a hand to the Philippines, so it has nothing to be blamed about from a humanitarian point of view," the paper said. "The ... donation was just tentative and depending on severity of damage China has suffered"

That turned out to be prophetic. On Thursday, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the country would provide an additional 10 million yuan (HK$12.6 million) worth of blankets, tents and materials to aid relief in the Philippines.

raymond.li@scmp.com

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

9

This article is now closed to comments

jiawang@adb.org
If China only shows concern for Chinese, who will show concern for China
if there is a war against her?
In the US, Chinese were upset because a 6-year-old child made a joke about "killing all the Chinese." Where could a 6-year-old child learn such a thing?
There is an unspoken secret that Chinese are not well liked. China should do good deeds to gain respect and friendship.
China never knows when it will need friendship and support from others.
whymak
PCC:
You're just as black hearted as the 92% of the Chinese bloggers. Worst, you are an out and out racist like caractacus. Why do you want to live among the people you hate much?
Perhaps you should also find out how many of our Filipino guest workers are giving to their compatriots.
Your racist hatred for Chinese is duly noted here as one of most tragic human conditions.
XYZ
When people starting throwing around charges of racism, you know they've lost the argument.
whymak
caractacus:
While vituperating your hate rhetoric for China and Chinese, have you donated anything yet?
One feels bad for the Haiyan victims. Their government and their NGOs, among them Philippine Red Cross, are so incompetent in collections that one wonders whether donations will be effectively deployed. For example, some days ago, I found Philippine RC didn't take charge cards. After I started a PayPal account so that I could give, I must first fill in the amount in pesos. Now they finally begin to accept charge cards, but who wants his account to be charged in an unknown currency?
So I ended up giving both times through MercyCorps.
Cut off your hate-China diatribes and open your wallet. Am I right also to assume that hateful people never give?
caractacus
Whatever China's motives in upping its contribution, altruism is unlikely to be among them. Handsome is as handsome does. The Filipinos and other SE Asian nations not in China's pocket know who their friends are.
shouken
You seem to be hinting that the US is Asian nations' real friend. If it comes to that, I think the United States is hardly any more altruistic than China (or anyone) in their foreign aid policies and practices. US foreign policy only serves US interests and if you can't see that it would be stupid is as stupid says.
caractacus
PCC's 2nd paragraph hits the nail right on the head. It is a deeply selfish and semi barbaric culture, not to mention arrogant.
XYZ
If, as the online poll from the Global Times suggests, 92% of Chinese people oppose increasing typhoon aid to the Philippine, then China probably shouldn't increase it. Actually, I find it hard to believe; it's probably just another fabricated number from the government mouthpiece.
.
If it were shown to be true that such a lopsided percentage of Chinese people hold such black hearted views towards innocent people in their moment of greatest need and distress, then it is testimony to either a very effective nationalistic propaganda campaign to demonize a neighboring country or a deeply selfish and semi-barbaric culture that has a long way to go before it earns any respect in the eyes of others, or both.
guy.pant
I read somewhere it was 84% in another poll. Anyhow, in Canada, there was a poll in those interested about the subject and 75% of those do not plan on donating to the Philippines so the numbers who do not want to donate may actually be higher. Apparently, government and media hype do not reflect the public at large.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or