• Mon
  • Dec 22, 2014
  • Updated: 3:42am
PUBLISHED : Sunday, 23 February, 2014, 5:07am
UPDATED : Sunday, 23 February, 2014, 10:28am

Direct rage at officials, not mainland Chinese visitors

Philip Bowring says the government must answer for overcrowding in the city - a result of poor housing and transport planning, exacerbated by other policy failures


Philip Bowring has been based in Asia for 39 years writing on regional financial and political issues. He has been a columnist for the South China Morning Post since the mid-1990s and for the International Herald Tribune from 1992 to 2011. He also contributes regularly to the Wall Street Journal, www.asiasentinel.com, a website of which he is a founder, and elsewhere. Prior to 1992 he was with the weekly Far Eastern Economic Review, latterly as editor.

The proposal to limit or tax mainland visitors is absurd and can only create ill will, not only among mainlanders but the wider world. Yet, while government officials denounce the damage caused by such demands, they should be reminded of their own recent contributions - indeed leadership - in undermining Hong Kong's tradition of openness to people, ideas, trade and money.

They should start by remembering who introduced the restriction on purchases of baby milk powder, a measure aimed at mainlanders. This law is in contradiction of the basic principle of free trade. Less noticed, but equally alarming, is official connivance at the causes of the local shortages of milk powder.

There is no global shortage of any of these products. Hong Kong can readily import enough to meet visitor demand. Shortages were the result of deliberate limitation of supply to maximise prices. This was only possible because vested interests are allowed to impede parallel imports of these goods.

Furthermore, if cross-border trade in milk powder was creating a problem for local public transport, a pro-active government would have provided a facility for such purchases at the border, just as it provides facilities for retailing at the airport.

No government can complain about demands for visitor restrictions when it imposes a special tax on property purchases by non-residents - again aimed at mainlanders. This has not even had the desired effect, at least for properties other than luxury ones. Yes, there was public clamour for measures to rein in mainland buying. But the anti-free-market measures, which will have to be withdrawn as the property cycle turns of its own accord, is a cover for the government's failures over the past decade to supply land for housing, whether private or public.

Leung Chun-ying is trying to rectify these years of deliberate starvation of land supply. But his two closest officials, Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, as former secretary for development and earlier as permanent secretary for housing, planning and lands, and John Tsang Chun-wah, as finance secretary, bear a heavy responsibility for that policy - and for attendant ones such as the surrender to illegalities protected by the Heung Yee Kuk.

Another gripe about mainland visitors is that they make public transport even more crowded. That is at best a half-truth, given that the average number of such visitors on any given day is no more than 5 per cent of the resident population. But again it points to past government failures to invest in additional public transport - even though its official forecasts for population growth were far higher than what eventuated.

The extensions now under way - to Ap Lei Chau, Kennedy Town and Whampoa, totalling just over 12 kilometres, and the Sha Tin-Central link, which will not be completed until 2020 - should have been started at least a decade ago.

Next is the traffic chaos caused by busloads of mainland tourists clogging streets in Wan Chai, Repulse Bay, Tsim Sha Tsui, and so on. It is not the tourists' fault that officials make minimal attempt to provide parking areas, or stop tourist buses disobeying parking regulations. But do not expect any action from ministers so fearful of making decisions that, to please some of the car- and truck-owning minority, they dare not raise the central tunnel toll, now just one-third of what it was in real terms when it opened in 1972. The minister must be sacked for incompetence.

Contrast the lack of effort and investment to deal with the mainland influx with the vast expenditure of public money on the cruise terminal in a prime harbour location which will be used by a tiny number of visitors.

There are costs as well as many benefits in mainland tourism, and Hong Kong needs to stop being spoiled and accept the downside as well as the benefits of an open society.

Instead of doing something positive to make the mainland influx less of an inconvenience, the government is making the public even more anxious by forecasting that mainland visitors will rise to 70 million by 2017. Like most government forecasts, that is probably exaggerated - and especially so if Hong Kong has nothing more to offer than shopping malls. But it is seen as a threat.

Which leads to a final local complaint: that small shops are being priced out of traditional areas by big brand names aiming at mainlanders and backed by the financial resources to offer top dollar to landlords. That is indeed a pity for residents who appreciated the variety of shops that these districts used to offer.

But the problem has been exacerbated by Hong Kong officials' attitudes to the secondary locations that should welcome the variety of shops and markets providing the variety of goods that visitors and locals would like to see. Thus, the Urban Renewal Authority destroys streets to pander to the greed of its developer partners, wet markets are forced out of business to please the retail oligopolies, and whole districts are subjected to destruction rather than modernisation for the benefit of a favoured few.

Let us welcome mainlander visitors (as others) and instead aim our wrath at Lam and her bureaucrats, whose failings and doings have fuelled local resentment.

Philip Bowring is a Hong Kong-based journalist and commentator


Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

John Adams
Wow ! Mr Bowring - you have fired a double broadside today !
But, as so often do Jake van der Kamp and Tom Holland, you have blown away the clouds and cut to the real heart of the issue.
I sincerely hope that our top officials read what you have written and take it to heart.
When there is real sickness and disease, the medicine is bitter and the treatment is painful.
PS : @ XYZ - I fully endorse both your comments below. There really is a feeling of frustration in HK society today and the recent anti-Mainland tourist demonstration was just a very ugly symptom of it. Yes , it was indeed "the only action that has been successful in capturing these same arrogant officials' attention"
CY was not dealt a very good hand when he took over as CE after the disastrous administration of Donald Tsang. However, his decision to retain the incompetent in the highest levels of govt means he now owns their failed policies.
Regarding Donald's cruise terminal, I noticed 2 ships moored at Ocean Terminal Friday evening. Has the cruise industry voted on the viability of the new cruise terminal located in the middle of nowhere?
I agree wholeheartedly with your observations about the failure of our grossly overpaid and incompetent Ministers and Mandarins. We cannot cope with a projected 70 million Mainland visitors and ordinary citizens are demanding action. The attack on the tourists last week was wrong but the message was right. Simply criticizing the demonstrators and floating ideas such as amending the anti- discrimination laws has been the Government's pathetic response to date to the genuine frustration expressed. These people aren't worth $300,000 a year let alone $300,000+++ per month. They are so overpaid they spend their time protecting their backs - or vying for 'honours' such as the GBS - but this acronym easily stands for something else...... You are so right. CY kept them on and now he owns all of the poor policy decisions he inherited. Really, this is such a sad state of affairs for HK.
AMEN, Sir!!!! I felt like I just finished reading a fire and brimstone sermon!!
speaking of which when can we expect Bowtie in court for Misconduct in Public Office et alia?
Might as well throw in Henry the oaf and Travealot Yau for good measure
Dai Muff
I have seen Macau. It's hell. Obviously you do not go there much.
Very well said
The mainlanders are the scapegoats
Over-crowding is no excuse, see Macau.
Bottlenecks do exist but that could be solved by proper policies.
The aging MTR would one day drag the whole HK down.
Well even if the government has it part in this nightmare we should also see the fact that there are lots of abuse in this freedom.
As per saying : ones freedom begins where it ends for someone else.
Issue is like in a class of students one student misbehaves and the whole class has to bear with the consequences.
Perhaps this articles was written by a lao wai, a foreigner who doesn't appreciate the loss of convenience and taste as a local Hongkonger since the mainland tourists concurred our territory. Take Shatin as an example, a place which I have lived for more than 3 decades. Tell me where can we find supermarkets, hardward stores, small appliances shops...that is more convenient than finding a jewellery outlet, Coach, Bally, Manning for milk powder......things that we are so used to having since a kid seems to be missing totally in the New Town Plaza of Shatin! Thanks to all these mainland tourists! Shatin is no longer the people's Shatin any more! Hong Kong is no longer the people's Hong Kong any more!
Com'on take one for the team! Otherwise Causeway Bay or TST would be even more crowded. (What is there in Sha Tin anyways roast pigeon and a race course). It's ironic, many of those people go to Sha Tin because it is more convenient and more stock available. Mong Kok, cwb, tst is not attractive any more, probably too crowded or always out of stock.
But instead of targeting tourists, why not be objective and target pseudo chemists and designer wear shops. I walked into those chemists with an injury, they asked me to go to watsons. They only wanted tourists bulk buying milk power, ginseng, birds nest etc. WTF! Why not boot those fake chemists out in Fanling.
What about land lords, where is their "social responsibility"? They are the ones smiling!!




SCMP.com Account