• Sun
  • Dec 28, 2014
  • Updated: 2:54am
CommentInsight & Opinion

Officials guilty of tunnel vision by failing to tackle congestion

PUBLISHED : Saturday, 22 February, 2014, 4:22am
UPDATED : Saturday, 22 February, 2014, 6:37am

Regrettably, the proverbial light at the end of the tunnel for cross-harbour traffic congestion is nowhere in sight. In yet another all-talk-and-no-action episode, the government has put off decisions on tackling congestion arising from uneven tunnel usage. The do-nothing approach, after years of study and consultations, is disappointing. While it may appease drivers opposed to a toll rise, it reflects badly on the government's lack of political will to resolve a long-standing problem. Meanwhile, tunnel users have no choice but to put up with jams for at least a few more years.

The idea of spreading traffic via toll adjustment is long overdue. It involves charging more for using the heavily congested Cross Harbour Tunnel, while slashing tolls at the private and underused eastern tunnel with a government subsidy. Unpopular as this is, it is something worth trying. But the transport chief thinks otherwise, citing the lack of consensus and recent changes in traffic levels as the reasons.

Officials are not obliged to implement the proposals. After all, the consultation is designed to find out what stakeholders prefer or dislike. If there is wide opposition, there is reason for a rethink. Yet the reasons given for keeping the status quo are unconvincing. Even if usage at the central and eastern tunnels is said to have eased and increased, respectively, in recent years without intervention, it is unclear whether that is a trend.

Successive governments have for years vowed to tackle the problem. Sadly, little has been done. All we have seen are rounds of studies without any way forward. Even when there seems to be a direction, it's leading to nowhere. The public could be excused for feeling frustrated and helpless.

Traffic congestion is common to many major cities. What sets Hong Kong apart is that it is aggravated by differential tunnel charges and ownerships. Officials understandably feel their hands are tied. But that does not mean they can just fold their arms as queues lengthen. Doing nothing is hardly responsible governance.

The problem is not just that it takes more time to reach a destination. For a business-conscious city like Hong Kong, every minute counts. A smoother journey means money and time saved, and less roadside pollution. It is true that there is no straightforward solution to congested tunnels. But the government will never succeed if it does not give it a try. The last thing officials want is to be seen as having tunnel vision.


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

How can there be any 'consensus' on this issue? If that was a criteria then why go through a consultation exercise in the first place! We're all sick and tired of these overpaid Ministers and so called 'top civil servants' achieving nothing year after year after year! If we sacked the principal secretaries and their assistants would we notice any deterioration in day to day governance? Clearly, the answer is no! Unfortunately, we're going to see more of the same - poorly drafted and slanted consultations, rigged consultation reports and then either proposed legislation which achieves very little or the problem is placed in the 'too hard to handle' tray. The latter is the decision of choice by these useless useless bureaucrats!
This is a classic example of what is wrong with our govt.: the lack of leadership to face up to problems and solve them. But the traffic issues associated with tunnel congestion and minor compared to other problems we face. The next pandemic of bird flu could be catastrophic but govt. won't upset a few chicken traders by banning live poultry in our markets. 3000 people a year are estimated to die of air pollution but nothing has been done. On and on....the only thing govt. is pursuing effectively is promoting tourism, the absolute last thing in the universe that needs promotion.
As for the usage of different tunnels by the drivers per se, the drivers have the choice to pay more for less congestion, or pay less for more congestion. Charging drivers for entering busy districts, like Central, during rush hour will be more effective than sharing congestion among tunnels.
Tunnel vision for sure. Looking at yesterday's traffic jam from Sheung wan and beyond heading eastward how would a change in the eastern and central toll help? There is just no space east bound. Lowering the toll for western tunnel crossing over to Kowloon would be more logical especially during peak hours. You can maintain the toll charge Kowloon to HK.
HK was the first place to look at electronic toll in congested areas and did nothing for over 20years.


SCMP.com Account