• Thu
  • Jul 31, 2014
  • Updated: 2:45am
PUBLISHED : Sunday, 04 May, 2014, 4:15am
UPDATED : Sunday, 04 May, 2014, 4:15am

The politics of self-interest rules in Hong Kong

Philip Bowring says from the Lamma ferry case to the high-speed rail link and incinerator plans, officials have shown they act out of self-interest rather than for the public good

BIO

Philip Bowring has been based in Asia for 39 years writing on regional financial and political issues. He has been a columnist for the South China Morning Post since the mid-1990s and for the International Herald Tribune from 1992 to 2011. He also contributes regularly to the Wall Street Journal, www.asiasentinel.com, a website of which he is a founder, and elsewhere. Prior to 1992 he was with the weekly Far Eastern Economic Review, latterly as editor.
 

Hong Kong has a problem with a dysfunctional political system. But a bigger obstacle to effective administration is the behaviour of the top ranks of an increasingly politicised bureaucracy.

Self-protection rules, often in conjunction with corporate money. The case of the Lamma ferry is truly shocking. There may be a (weak) case in law for not divulging the full contents of the government's inquiry into the October 1, 2012 tragedy. However, that this is nothing other than a cover-up is shown by reference back to the independent, judge-led inquiry published a year ago.

In this column on May 5, 2013, I wrote praising the thoroughness of that 268-page report, but added: "Misgivings arise from the fact that the conclusions relating to the coxswains of the two vessels have been redacted as the individuals have been charged [but] … none of the others concerned, some of whom can be identified in the report, and others who could be identified if the matter was pursued, have been prosecuted.

"Are we to assume that they now cannot be prosecuted because trials would be prejudiced by what is in this report? One has to begin to wonder whether anyone in the Marine Department, Hongkong Electric or those involved in the design, building and modification of Lamma IV will be prosecuted. Are they being enabled to hide behind departmental or corporate veils?"

Clearly they were. So now we have another report, this time from the very bureau responsible for the Marine Department, which has taken 18 months to prepare yet - unlike the earlier independent inquiry - mostly remains hidden from the public.

Now we are told the latter report's evidence relating to possible criminal prosecutions will be followed up by the police. But what have the police been doing to follow up on the conclusions of the first inquiry - that the 39 deaths were not only the result of navigational errors but of failure of the Lamma IV to conform to design, construction and safety standards? The only prosecution has been the derisory fine against Hongkong Electric for under-staffing its vessel.

The drawn-out government inquiry has been an excuse for the police, so quick to charge the coxswains, to do nothing about those responsible for the abysmal state of the Lamma IV.

And now the secretary for justice makes exaggerated claims about the legal problems of releasing the report - even with individual names redacted. Until shown otherwise, the policy appears to be to place all blame on the low-paid coxswains while officials and those at the corporate level escape blame.

This failure to serve the public's best interest is also evident in the fiasco of the MTR's high-speed rail project. The natural scapegoats for this appear to be the project head, who is retiring early, and the manager of the West Kowloon part of it, who is not renewing his contract. Both these people are foreigners, one Malaysian, one British. Both have extensive experience in rail tunnel projects. Were they really so ignorant as not to report realistically to their superiors? Or were they working from a script written by bureaucrats and approved by the Transport Bureau?

All along, the high-speed rail project has been driven by a mix of politics (getting closer to the mainland), bureaucratic interests (the engineers who want to justify their existence) and the corporations that would benefit if the railway was brought deep into the heart of Kowloon, close to their commercial and residential developments.

As a result, the price tag for a 26km-long railway, now HK$67 billion and almost certain to rise, is probably double what it need have been if the terminus had been in the New Territories. China has never thought it necessary to bring these projects to the heart of the city: the Beijing terminus is 8km from the city centre; Guangzhou's is 17km away.

Those ultimately responsible for Hong Kong's overspend had no concern for the public interest in using public money to best effect. Initial cost estimates were understated to deter opposition; completion time was underestimated to conform to a timetable set across the border.

Similar attitudes prevail in the case of the proposed giant incinerator. Of course Hong Kong badly needs incinerators, just as it needs the sort of waste management policies Tokyo instituted 45 years ago. But, instead of meeting critics with facts and long-term policies, the bureaucracy stonewalls, meanwhile blaming delays on the legislature.

That is not to defend the legislator silliness that gives representative government a bad name. Filibustering is not a right, but a dubious device that has mainly flourished in the US. But legislators cannot be blamed for taking a sceptical, if not cynical, view of the motives behind some big-ticket spending decisions. The Lamma IV, the rail project and the incinerator all provide ample cause for subjecting decisions to close scrutiny.

If the government wants to see more rapid progress, it had better lay out honestly alternative options and costs for public and expert discussion - then act decisively on the outcome. As it is, the public is subjected to reports by so-called independent consultants who are expected, if they want future business, to endorse a predetermined policy.

Philip Bowring is a Hong Kong-based journalist and commentator

Share

Related topics

More on this story

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

9

This article is now closed to comments

humandept_2012
Thanks Philip, for not letting this one sink beneath the dross of infotainment - the exact same conditions created the recent ferry disaster (seriously too small a word) in Korea.
DinGao
When my subscription runs out I am not going to renew it. Perhaps someone will knock on my door if there is any good news to be had.
allan94
so hk govt is useless. how is that news??
so what can anyone do about it??
except emigrate. But the problem is, other places in the world are mostly worse!!
so, hk people, come monday morning, get back to work, tolerate your boss, get your paycheck, and make sure u pay li ka shing on time.
Dao-Phooy
Another excellent article. Our government is completely dysfunctional - so many people are feeling more pessimistic about HK's future - it feels grim and getting bleaker day by day.
rpasea
Agree completely. I was hoping CY would clean house and get capable ministers in place but he kept most of the same bumbling fools and seems to be an empty suit himself. The watershed for HK will be the 2017 CE elections when the citizens realize they were lied to about universal suffrage.

HK's heyday was the decade between the mid 80's to the mid 90's. What a great place to live and work then. Looking back, the smart money left right at the handover.
chaz_hen
One country, one system. ASIA'S WORLD CITY...
johnyuan
At the time of the handover, I believe all negotiating parties including the people in Hong Kong felt Hong Kong’s future is assuring to continue uninterrupted. Such sentiment was much predicated that Hong Kong still had its civil servants which were much trumpeted as the world’s best.
.
Nonetheless, aside the civil servant made a big transformation through localization which disparaged non-Chinese speaking and writing of its members and the addition layer of ministers in government structure, the biggest transformation as I observe civil servant has become a political power.
.
It never proclaims to be one even though we see the result of its action acting in union much as a power to reckon with. I would imagine our elected CE and the appointed ministers must experience the most for being in fact they are the outsiders to the civil servant.
.
Hong Kong must recognize what the civil servant has become. When it will its political power with the property developers, Hong Kong no longer utterly what it was. We may continue to have a larger headache than we realize since the handover.
dienw
" I would imagine our elected CE and the appointed ministers must experience the most for being in fact they are the outsiders to the civil servant " sorry, john, but what does this mean? Indeed, the whole post? And "our elected CE"?
johnyuan
To die...
.
Quite so.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or