• Mon
  • Oct 20, 2014
  • Updated: 7:17am
CommentInsight & Opinion

Let divorcing couples decide if they need counselling

PUBLISHED : Saturday, 14 June, 2014, 4:25am
UPDATED : Saturday, 14 June, 2014, 5:48am
 

Marriages are supposed to last a lifetime, but more than one-third in Hong Kong end in divorce. Most often, a couple decide they are not right for each other and part ways peacefully. If children are involved, though, the circumstances are markedly different; the experience can be traumatic and psychologically damaging. The effects on a family and, perhaps later, the community can be such that there are growing calls for mandatory counselling to try to prevent break-ups.

Singapore is considering the idea as part of a review of its family justice system. Like Hong Kong, the city-state has been built on conservative values and strong family ties, but divorce rates are also rapidly increasing. The similarities are reason for the Hong Kong government's top family policy adviser, Family Council chairman Daniel Shek Tan-lei, to suggest studying the idea, even though it goes against traditional thinking. Singaporean courts and social welfare services are already key players in supporting families that are splitting up, the priority being to protect children's interests.

More could certainly be done in Hong Kong to help families going through divorce. While Singapore provides one-stop specialist support, services here are fragmented. Mediation, counselling and visitation of children by separated and divorced parents are dealt with in a disjointed manner and there is no seamless progression to such services from the courts. Skilled specialists are in short supply.

But while post-divorce services need reviewing, it would be wrong to try to force a couple to stay together if they want otherwise. Lawyers are already required to suggest counselling to work through differences. There should be nothing mandatory about the process. Marriage is a personal matter that involves a decision by two adults, and divorce should not be treated differently. A couple may want advice or counselling, especially if children are involved, but it is for them, not the government, to decide.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

3

This article is now closed to comments

gunzy
Mercedes, every couple is different, how they handle problems are different, catching potential problems before a marriage doesn't necessarily mean it becomes a problem during marriage.
.
Pre marital counseling is not some crystal ball that can predict a problem marriage, it fosters communication, but it is still up to the couple to communicate.
JC
Agree with you. No right minded and well intentioned government will think that they can make a couple stay together against their wishes. But it is not fundamentally wrong to try and limit the collateral damage, especially their innocent kids. Feuding couples can be guided on this as they are often too emotionally charged to see the broadest consequences of their break-up. Once again, no standard prescription as each couple is different
mercedes2233
I am a little surprised. Surely if any counseling is required, it should be provided for couples thinking of marriage rather than after problems have emerged.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or