• Sat
  • Dec 27, 2014
  • Updated: 1:24pm
My Take
PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 26 August, 2014, 4:35am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 26 August, 2014, 10:22am

Hong Kong's MTR shows bad crisis management over stray dog

The unfortunate MTR stray dog incident has become a full-blown crisis.

Assuming that staff on the ground did not do their job humanely, protesters used the full might of social media and street protests to demonise MTR staff and management.

Memorials and an online petition attracting tens of thousands of signatures condemned the MTR for not stopping the cross-border train which killed the animal. OK, that's going a bit overboard but their criticism is not without reason.

Not every problem and situation staff face can be covered by bureaucratic guidelines. Intelligent and well-trained MTR staff on the ground sometimes need to take the initiative to handle a situation satisfactorily.

The outcry forced senior managers such as MTR operations director Dr Jacob Kam Chak-pui to make a public apology. This in turn draws another round of complaints from MTR staff unions, whose leaders say managers essentially throw them to the wolves when they should have expressed support to boost staff morale.

They say if staff were not given guidelines, they could not be faulted. Really? The fault must lie with management which has failed to provide them when such incidents have happened before.

And so the blame game continues.

But could it all have been handled differently? The dilemma staff faced that day was a conflict between keeping the trains running smoothly and on time, and causing a delay, perhaps for hours, to try to save a stray dog.

Because of repeated train delays in recent months, the rail operator has been under enormous pressure. Some passengers and critics say it's more important to keep operations running; others say a life, even if it's just that of a stray, is worth going out of the way to save.

I am with the latter group. If nothing else, MTR staff could always take the moral high ground if passengers complain that a rescue resulted in serious delays. That was what operators did in New York a year ago when they stopped trains for hours to save a couple of kittens.

Well, at least MTR staff will now have specific guidelines on how to handle strays.


Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Will people please watch this video first before making a comment ?
Now tell me whether or not the dog could/should have been saved, and why it was not.
Does one need guidelines to hold a dog between two full-grown males and haul it up, when it was already trying to get up? Why stop a passenger from saving it when that was almost done? Would staff need guidelines if a human was on the tracks? Are they dim-witted or what? And one staff member was reported to have said 'It's only a dog.'
New York subway stopped two lines for two hours to rescue two tiny kittens, but of course we are not New York.
Why detractors want to link this with us eating meat, I don't know. This is a case of injustice to the poor dog, a fellow living creature, by very stupid staff, and I am glad that so many HK people protested for 'only a dog', when it could no longer speak for itself.
just to think about if it was a human being, would you be still considering not acceptable of any delay. It started because of a stray dog, deep down it was about the ignorance of safety due to public pressure or even the fine involved.
The wisest man is the man who criticizes after the event.
Tomonday says you are to get a life and give it a rest. I don't know though why he is still reading these comments and not giving it a rest himself. The hundreds of people who spontaneously gathered to lament the dog's passing obviously don't agree with you.
The New York subway stopped two lines for two hours to rescue two little kittens. Maybe you would call that 'serious lack of a sense of proportion and excess of stupidity' too. Fortunately life goes on, we still believe what we believe in, and nobody has to care, or stop their grieving, because of your views.
I think the MTR assumed that this problem would never arise since the whole track has been fenced now for decades.
Did this dog have an owner?
Is anyone being investigated over how it got onto the tracks in the first place?
I would hardly say running over a stray dog is a crisis.
It is just an incident escalated out of proportion with its actual significance by doggie lovers and those who complain/protest against anything.
As a daily commuter on MTR, I would be furious if they were willing to suspend service for an hour or so everytime a pigeon is electrocuted or a butterfly hits the windscreen.
Time for Alex Lo to get off the bandwagon.
Hmmm... I would like to know how many people who signed that online petition eat meat on a regular basis. I am completely ignorant of the topic, but I imagine the methods used by mainland manufacturers to terminate cows/pigs/chickens are no more humane than a head-on collision with a speeding train. It's unfortunate that the dog had to die but there are for worse things in the news for people to be getting upset about.
Dear heaven, there is a serious lack of a sense of proportion and excess of stupidity in HK over this. What about all the wildlife, birds and so on, that gets killed on a daily basis not only on the MTR lines but also on the roads. Had this dog not been in a station, no one would have been any wiser, except the track inspectors.
I take it that you are getting on with life as you proposed. Why then are you still reading and directing us? Go back into the sunshine and play your violins. It might even make you a likeable person.
That's the job of the MTR. We are just concerned with how the dog died.




SCMP.com Account