Advertisement

My Take | The universal suffrage debate is sinking into a blame game

Even innovative devices like 'one country two systems' guaranteed in the Basic Law may fail, a Beijing official warned.

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
0
(Left to right) Maria Tam; Zhou Bo, of the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office; lawmaker Dr Priscilla Leung Mei-fun; Basic Law Committee vice-chairwoman Elsie Leung Oi-sie; Chen Zuoer; Zhang Rongshun; and Huang Lanfa, deputy director of the central government''s liaison office in Hong Kong.
Alex Loin Toronto

Even innovative devices like 'one country two systems' guaranteed in the Basic Law may fail, a Beijing official warned.

We always knew that, but it's still scary to hear it spoken out loud by Zhang Rongshun, the vice-chairman of the Legislative Affairs Commission under the National People's Congress Standing Committee.

"We understand any new system may succeed but could also fail," said Zhang in Beijing at a forum on the Basic Law.

"We strongly believe the Basic Law's innovative system could succeed, but eventually we have to let the facts speak."

It's a rare remark because Beijing has always insisted on the success and uniqueness of "one country two systems", thanks to the genius of the late Deng Xiaoping .

Except for its name, Zhang is quite wrong to say "one country two systems" is an innovation. It is not. Devolved power given to cities, territories and provinces as a political solution is nothing new. The latest example is the so-called "devolution max", which convinced enough voters in Scotland not to leave the British union.

Advertisement