WHAT THE MAINLAND MEDIA SAY
What the Mainland Media Say
by

With graft-busters on the take, how to guard the guardians?

Disciplinary officials must be beyond reproach, yet rising numbers are being ensnared in the anti-corruption drive

PUBLISHED : Sunday, 12 April, 2015, 7:29am
UPDATED : Wednesday, 15 April, 2015, 3:30pm

The main role of the party watchdog, the commissions for discipline inspection at various levels of government, is to tackle corruption. The groups are the most powerful investigative bodies on the mainland, even more so than the police or other law enforcement agencies, as they supervise the Communist Party's more than 80 million members and the whole of officialdom.

But the party is facing the challenge of how to guard the guardians, as those thought to guarantee communist rule could themselves be undermining the right to rule.

No wonder then that news the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection was investigating Zhong Shijian, deputy chief of the Guangdong provincial disciplinary agency, for graft became a hot topic of comment among state media.

"Like Caesar's wife, the discipline agency and its inspectors themselves must be beyond reproach. The investigation of a senior Guangdong official at the very heart of the struggle against corruption shows that the day when even the agency itself is above suspicion is still a long way off," a Xinhua editorial said. "Only when one is upright, can one ask others to be upright."

Jiangsu Wang, a news portal of the Jiangsu provincial government, asked that, with Zhong's arrest for alleged corruption charges, "whose face has it slapped?"

"Zhong Shijian has broken the rules he is supposed to uphold. His behaviour has tarnished the disciplinary body's reputation and is akin to a heavy slap on the anti-graft department's face," it said in a commentary.

But the Beijing Times said that "there is a symbolic significance to the sacking of disciplinary officials".

"It means that the disciplinary bodies are willing and are capable of probing internal corruption and that they will not only fight external 'tigers' and 'flies', but also those within," it said, referring to the terms for national and lower level officials targeted in the drive.

The official watchdogs are neither immune from graft, nor have they proven to be cleaner than any agencies in this regard.

Last year alone, 1,575 disciplinary officials were themselves caught in the anti-graft fight, according to the CCDI.

The spread of corruption within the watchdogs is another instance of "absolute power corrupts absolutely". With their independence from the legal and police system, graft-busters enjoy a huge concentration of power.

Even the party's Political and Legal Affairs committees at various levels, which oversee law-and-order policies and supervise the police forces, domestic security and law-enforcement bodies, have no right to countercheck activities carried out by disciplinary agencies.

While the party watchdogs have discretion to investigate officials and detain them, they are not accountable to any public institutions, save the party's top leadership.

Such concentration of power makes disciplinary officials themselves the target of bribes as corrupt officials try to share their illegal financial gains in exchange for assurances of security. With no one supervising the disciplinary commission staffers, they too may fall into corruption.

However, success in the drive against corruption should depend on a well-established system comprising checks and balances on power rather than relying on power itself.