Hypercritical Hongkongers deter officials and businesses from taking risks to improve the city

Politicians and the media reacted with anger to the government's decision to give New World Development the right to revitalise, enlarge and continue managing the Avenue of Stars on the Tsim Sha Tsui waterfront.

With elections on the way, perhaps a major property developer and the government are perfect targets. The fact is that New World already runs the Avenue of Stars. As an attraction for tourists or a public space for locals, it needs renovating. For years, people have asked for better seating, viewing platforms and food outlets there - the new plans would deliver them.

The critics' objection is that New World would benefit from continuing to operate the expanded promenade, as it owns nearby properties. This is presented as a scandal - but it is just stating the obvious. New World has a powerful incentive to make the place more attractive.

It is willing to upgrade and manage the site at its own expense. If the result is pleasant, the public and visitors get a nicer environment and a better experience, at no cost to themselves or the taxpayer. More people will come and enjoy the area - and yes, New World might attract more passers-by into its own nearby properties.

Would anyone lose anything or be cheated from this arrangement?

Nobody seems to think so when they look at the Star Street area in Wan Chai. Swire Properties, the biggest landlord in the neighbourhood, worked with the government to enhance the public space. At its own expense, the company provided stylish street lighting, paving and greenery. The result is a more pleasant place for anyone who passes through (without the civil service "look" we get in many public areas). Swire also benefits. What exactly is the problem?