Slow to act: Hong Kong government is the real laggard when it comes to improving broadband speeds for all
Robert Clark says given Hong Kong's resources and compact size, the government must pledge, as others have done, to ensure fast broadband access for all - starting with an overhaul of the dismal service in rural areas

But after 20 years, the industry rules are showing signs of wear. There are gaps in the network infrastructure, in the competitive environment and in consumer outcomes that can no longer be ignored.
Dealing with market failure is one reason why we have an industry regulator
This is most evident in the roll-out of next-generation broadband networks. It is an issue that many governments are grappling with. The scale and cost have led to some governments investing heavily in these networks. It is to Hong Kong's credit that we have gone most of the journey under the power of competition.
Today, the city's leading telecommunications operator, PCCW, reports that 87 per cent of buildings are fibre-ready, capable of supporting 100 Mbps, while 82 per cent of homes are fibre-ready.
But that leaves a gap of 13 per cent of buildings without fibre. At the same time, some 13 per cent of households have a choice of just one broadband provider, according to Ofca figures.

That is to say, in an industry driven by competition, nearly one in every eight Hong Kong households is subject to a de facto monopoly. Of course, the vast majority of these households are in rural areas, where the population is less and the network construction costs are much higher. But as there is no competition, the incumbent provider has little incentive to invest further. This is where our transition to next-generation broadband stalls.