bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

sponsorType

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Jake Van Der Kamp

The Airport Authority may increase take-offs at night to tackle a looming capacity crunch at Chek Lap Kok before a third runway is built ...
City Nov. 4
Do you remember being told just before our new airport opened that the harbour would be its new noise channel?
Here we thought that one big plus of having a new airport far off on the northern shore of Lantau Island was that we would no longer have to put up with the noise of aircraft taking off from the old Kai Tak airport right in the centre of the harbour area.
It was certainly so if you lived on that side of the harbour and could mark the passage of time every few minutes with the thought of "There goes another one". If you lived further west along the harbour you hardly heard it.
And then along came the Airport Authority with a message that, with the sugar coating removed: "Guess what, now you're going to hear it all the time, and louder too, and everywhere along the harbour. That's the new approach and take-off path."
Civic governments elsewhere move airports out of town to get away from the noise. We moved ours out of town to get right under the noise.
They could have told us when the airport was in the feasibility stage as they already knew then where that approach path would have to go. But they didn't.
They waited until the very last minute and then just sort of leaked it out - "Oh sorry, forgot to tell you, can't imagine why we didn't tell you earlier."
Well, I can imagine. It is because our airport authority has long sold itself out to that cabal of airlines, hotelkeepers and retail landlords that calls itself the tourism industry and feels it has the right to inflict any cost or inconvenience on us for the sake of a so-called pillar industry that brings the narrow cabal a great deal and the rest of us very little.
The Airport Authority does not really serve us. It serves the greater glory of the airport, that is when it is not making ritual obeisance to the tourism industry. We are the sacrifices of this cult.
The airport's accounts show it. Fully 92 per cent of its pre-tax earnings last year came from retail leases and other terminal commercial operations plus airport investment ventures in mainland China. The airlines use the airport at cost, a nice gift from the Hong Kong taxpayers who paid for building the whole thing.
The Airport Authority has taken such good care of the airlines, in fact, that the landing and parking charges it levies on them are now 15 per cent lower, yes, lower, than they were in 1998 when the airport was opened.
This was done despite the fact that it had on hand an independent study by a reputable British air traffic consultant, Leigh Fisher, that our airport's charges were far lower than worldwide counterparts, the 54th lowest of 55 international airports covered.
As an inadvertently leaked paper from the deputy projects director also showed three years ago, the new airport runs about 57 per cent more flights than the old airport at Kai Tak used to do for the same number of passengers.
Congestion made Kai Tak disciplined about serving secondary mainland cities with smaller aircraft. That discipline went by the board at the new airport. In fact, the Airport Authority pitched mainland cities for more small aircraft business.
And then they turned around and pitched us for what will probably be nearly HK$200 billion for a third runway to handle the increase in passenger and cargo traffic.
They tell us that it can be paid for internally through an extra levy on passengers and cargo. But in order to raise the project finance they will of course also need a government guarantee. The taxpayer goes on the hook again.
I shall be very surprised if the first economic downturn that comes round won't have them coming back to say that a guarantee is not enough and taxpayer cash will also have to be added to the mix.
And now they tell us that they want to keep us awake at night because we have not approved the third runway idea quickly enough.


Hong Kong court slams Airport Authority, Aecom over exploiting expert in third runway project

Former Airport Authority executive pleads guilty to accepting HK$3.3 million in bribes

Use third airport runway to cement Hong Kong’s hub status

HK$7 million payouts on offer to airlines as Hong Kong airport bids to fill new runway slots

Hong Kong's third runway proposal

Making lots of noise about operation of Hong Kong's airport

Planes are the only thing that will be taking off. Complaints will as well. Photo: K. Y. Cheng

Hong Kong airport studies adding day and night flights ahead of 2-runway capacity crunch

Hong Kong International Airport is expected to reach its stipulated capacity of 420,000 takeoffs and landings annually by next year. Photo: Bruce Yan

Hong Kong International Airport is expected to reach its stipulated capacity of 420,000 takeoffs and landings annually by next year. Photo: Sam Tsang

An increase in noise from Hong Kong International Airport is an inevitable price that must be paid

A two-year study will be carried out by the Airport Authority to look into the feasibility and impact of more night flights. Photo: Sam Tsang

Ground control to major wrong: Hong Kong's air traffic control system three years out of date, government thinks more managers needed 

An overseas consultant will advise on the safety and reliability of the system before it is fully operational. Photo: Nora Tam

Find new ways to end old gridlock, Hong Kong concern groups and industry reps tell airport authority

Critics called the scheme to encourage airlines to start new routes a failure. Photo: Bloomberg 

Opinion

Business

Jake's View

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

.css-1m2rp1p{color:#34b8b5;}Jake's View | Making lots of noise about operation of Hong Kong's airport

Jake's View | Making lots of noise about operation of Hong Kong's airport