Opinion | Why talk of an independent Hong Kong fails the test of reality
Regina Ip says Hong Kong’s history shows clearly that it never had the kind of autonomy advocates of independence seek, and while the students can be naive, the adults should really know better
The idea of Hong Kong independence was first mooted on a website, Hong Konger Front, in 2004. It advocated building an independent Hong Kong “nation” by referendum. As the relationship between mainland China and Hong Kong was stable at that time, the website drew little public attention.
Pro-independence Hong Kong radicals start recruiting youth corps for ‘military’ summer camp
In 2011, the relationship began to deteriorate, following the influx of mainland women coming here to give birth and the spike in parallel trade in powdered milk and other daily necessities. The resultant disruption and tension spawned a slew of radical localist groups, which staged anti-mainland protests under the banner of protecting local interests. Some even challenged China’s sovereignty by unfurling the British colonial flag and demonstrating outside the People’s Liberation Army’s barracks in Central.
Localism is becoming a force to be reckoned with in Hong Kong politics
Hong Kong’s new pro-democracy groups pose new problems for traditional pan-democrat camp
Irrespective of whether the term “autonomy”, “self-determination” or “independence” is used, the thrust of the arguments is the same. The objective is to shake free the shackles of the Basic Law to redefine who qualifies as Hong Kong permanent residents, who has the authority to control the movement of Chinese people into Hong Kong, and to seek a new political status that will enable Hong Kong to “determine its own destiny”. All of this shows clear signs of influence of political thinkers who advocate defining nationhood on the basis of the common cultural and social identity of the people.
Hong Kong young people fuel rise of localism at city’s universities
The students show great dissatisfaction with the status quo, and many of their complaints against the social and economic inequities are understandable and justified. They are naturally the boldest in urging negotiation with Beijing to achieve a freer, more independent status. Yet, their vision fails miserably against the test of reality.
Hong Kong had never been ‘autonomous’ or ‘free’ before the Chinese takeover
