Can China lead the world on reducing the threat of nuclear war?
Tom Plate says while Obama’s visit to Hiroshima is welcome, Xi Jinping has a real opportunity to steer the world away from the use of nuclear arms as a defence option


For their demonstrations of remembrance and concern, we applaud both, while devoutly wishing that President Xi Jinping ( 習近平 ) would choose to do the same some day soon. It would be so impactful for the world to see China’s president free himself from the familiar chain of enmity with Japan by visiting Hiroshima. In all-out nuclear war, after all, China could lose more people than anyone.
Japan, once Asia’s No 1, will always have hanging in its closet the brutal ghost of having served as the first target of an atomic bombing: Will history record Hiroshima and Nagasaki as the last ones? The war-ending consequences of the A-bomb decisions by US president Harry S. Truman still reverberate. Among other things, politically, they include helping breed a populace that rates among the world’s most consistently pacifist; and, paradoxically, supporting a political and military elite that at times seems to suggest Japan was somehow innocent for what preceded its nuclear nightmare. But please do note sympathetically the patient endurance of the largely pacifist Japanese people with a political system (engineered by conquering America) that has produced too many moral dwarfs and politically deaf figures.
In his 2014 novel, Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki and His Years of Pilgrimage, Haruki Murakami might have been speaking for many Japanese with these words spoken by one of the characters: “You can hide memories, but you can’t erase the history that produced them ... If nothing else, you need to remember that. You can’t erase history, or change it. It would be like destroying yourself.”