Advertisement
Singapore military vehicle seizure
Opinion

For Beijing, seizure of Singapore armoured vehicles is a low-risk shot across the bows

Michal Thim says China sees a good opportunity to challenge not only the long-standing partnership between Singapore and Taiwan, but also to bring the Singapore government ‘in line’ for what Beijing perceives as its pro-US position

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Michal Thim says China sees a good opportunity to challenge not only the long-standing partnership between Singapore and Taiwan, but also to bring the Singapore government ‘in line’ for what Beijing perceives as its pro-US position
Michal Thim
While Beijing has always known about the arrangements between Taiwan and Singapore and remained silent on the issue until now, seizure of the armoured vehicles provides it with an excellent opportunity. Illustration: Craig Stephens
While Beijing has always known about the arrangements between Taiwan and Singapore and remained silent on the issue until now, seizure of the armoured vehicles provides it with an excellent opportunity. Illustration: Craig Stephens
The discovery of nine, allegedly undeclared, armoured combat vehicles belonging to the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) set off a diplomatic storm as soon as it was revealed that the military machines were returning from regular exercises that the SAF conduct in Taiwan. Singapore authorities appear to be genuinely surprised and confused as stops like this has been a routine matter in the past. The question ultimately boils down to, “Why now?

The answer is that, while Beijing has always known about the arrangements between Taiwan and Singapore and remained silent on the issue until now, seizure of the armoured vehicles provides it with an excellent opportunity. Whether this occasion is orchestrated or opportunistic is of secondary importance. The affair gives China floor to push back against the undesirable activity, drive a wedge between Singapore and Taiwan and give a lesson to Singapore for recent statements on the South China Sea and China’s role in the dispute.

Part of a broader debate that affects Singapore’s relations with China and Taiwan are rather fundamental differences between how states understand their respective “One China” policies and China’s demand to adhere to the “One China” principle. “One China” policy usually means that the respective country recognises the existence of only one state called China. The specifics of that policy are then subject to individual interpretations.

Advertisement

What’s really making Beijing angry with Singapore?

Beijing would naturally prefer that countries strictly adhere to the more explicit “One China” principle, which in short means that the mainland and Taiwan are part of the same state – the People’s Republic of China. Singapore’s official position is arguably close to how China would like it to be when it explicitly says that it recognises that Taiwan is part of China (the US, for example, merely acknowledges China’s position on the issue). However, that has not prevented the close relationship between Singapore and Taiwan from remaining viable alongside Singapore’s flourishing economic ties with China and security partnership with the US.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x