image

Brexit

The dangerous fallout from a “hard” Brexit

The uncertainty over Britain’s future ties with Europe, a renewed call for Scottish independence and the possibility of a good result for the far-right party in France are a matter of concern for the whole world

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 15 March, 2017, 5:08am
UPDATED : Wednesday, 15 March, 2017, 5:08am

The fallout from a hard Brexit has begun to emerge. After Scotland voted 62 per cent in favour of remaining in the European Union, Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has given notice that she will begin the process of seeking another referendum on Scottish independence, rejected by 65 per cent of Scots less than three years ago.

In London, Prime Minister Theresa May has served notice that she will brook no internal dissent, even from an octogenarian party elder. Michael Heseltine nearly succeeded Margaret Thatcher as prime minister. His sacking by May as a government adviser over his support for a change to her Brexit legislation is seen as signalling to followers that they are either with her or against her, and to the European Union that she is not going to be pushed around in the hard negotiations ahead on the terms of withdrawal.

British Prime Minister May says will have Brexit trigger in days as she prepares country for ‘defining moment’

Both events underline the divisive uncertainty over Brexit, amid fears that May’s plan for a “hard” exit will hurt the British economy. They do nothing to lift hopes for a smooth process and minimum disruption, amid protectionist sentiment in the US. Uncertainty is neither good for Europe, nor for markets. Having become prime minister in the wake of the unexpected vote to leave, May’s hard line may reflect a sense of historic responsibility to carry out the people’s will. Her speech to parliament spelling out her plans established some broad principles of how she sees the way forward.

For the global economy, especially the financial order, the sooner the uncertainty is sorted out the better for everyone, including China, which has used London as a springboard into Europe. That said, there will be opportunities for China to consolidate its emerging role as the leader of global free trade. It remains to be seen whether Britain can salvage access to the European market for financial services, and reconcile its people’s dislike of open immigration with the need for foreign talent. The realities of disentanglement from Europe reflect on the populist remedies for discontent which prevailed in the referendum and the complacency of those aghast at the outcome.

It is to be hoped this is a wake-up call to voters in France, where far-right National Front presidential candidate Marine Le Pen is campaigning on “France first” policies inspired by President Donald Trump’s “America first” campaign. She promises freedom from the “tyrannies” of globalisation and the EU. Polls predict she will do well enough in the first round of voting to contest the second round. The British have left the French with no excuse for complacency.

If populism prevails again Le Pen may not be bound, as May is, by the result of a plebiscite, but her mandate could raise grave concerns about the future of the EU.