China is taking steps on the long road to a credible judiciary
Grenville Cross says the recent moves to prevent wrongful verdicts are needed if the judiciary is to ultimately gain legitimacy
In 2015, the conviction rate in criminal trials in mainland China was 99.92 per cent, with 1.23 million accused being convicted. High conviction rates were seen as vindicating the way the authorities handled cases. However, the danger of relating the ratio of guilty verdicts to the performance of judges is now being recognised.

Zhou declared that “such wrongful convictions humiliate justice”, and called on courts at all levels to learn appropriate lessons. He was duly supported by the prosecutor general, Cao Jianming ( 曹建明 ), who called on prosecutors to find, report and correct cases based on false premises, and to hold accountable those responsible for miscarriages of justice. Their joint message was clear: acquittals are not something for the courts to be afraid of, but, in appropriate cases, are even to be welcomed, as where the evidence is lacking or unreliable. This approach will hopefully hit home among the nation’s jurists.
China’s top court lists jailing rights activists as its biggest achievement
It is encouraging that the judicial authorities now recognise that, quite apart from its impact on the innocent, a miscarriage of justice also damages the credibility of the courts themselves. Since the judiciary is being increasingly staffed by highly trained professionals, who are replacing the retired cadres put on the bench as a reward for loyal party service, these are messages that should resonate. The judges will, however, still need to assert their independence in the face of often conviction-minded law enforcement personnel. After all, what is said on high in Beijing is not always taken at face value on the ground, at least not in the more remote parts of the country.