Advertisement

Hong Kong government needs to get tough with rogue pro-Beijing lawmakers and activists, too

Albert Cheng says Carrie Lam and her ministers have come down hard on the democrats and independence advocates, so they should not tolerate threats such as Junius Ho’s ‘kill without mercy’

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Lawmaker Junius Ho speaks at a rally on September 17 to pressure the University of Hong Kong to sack its associate professor of law and Occupy Central co-organiser Benny Tai. At the rally, Ho led a Cultural Revolution-style denunciation of Tai and pro-independence activists. Photo: Felix Wong
The Leung Chun-ying era has ended, and Zhang Xiaoming, director of the central government’s liaison office, is to be transferred back to Beijing to take up a more significant role, as director of the State Council’s Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office. However, the leaving of two leaders known for their hardline views has not brought peace to Hong Kong; the political turmoil continues.
The latest drama involved pro-Beijing lawmaker Junius Ho Kwan-yiu. Backed by the liaison office and rural leader Tsang Shu-wo, Ho launched an online petition and organised a rally to pressure the University of Hong Kong to sack Benny Tai Yiu-ting, its associate professor of law and co-organiser of the Occupy Central protests.
At the rally at Tamar Park last Sunday, which police said was attended by some 2,000 people at its peak (organisers claimed 4,000 turned up), Ho and Tsang led a Cultural Revolution-style public denunciation of Tai and the pro-independence camp. Tsang told the crowd that pro-independence activists should be “killed”, and Ho responded by leading a chant of “no mercy”.
Advertisement
Their actions have angered many people, but Ho has refused to apologise, arguing that the word the participants used at the rally was not “kill” but in fact “halt” (the two words are homonyms).

Sorry shouldn’t be the hardest word for Junius Ho

Twenty-two pan-democratic lawmakers have jointly released a statement condemning Ho’s speech, saying it advocated violence and breaking the law. They said Ho’s action went beyond freedom of speech, and have pledged to pursue the matter at Legislative Council meetings.
Advertisement

Indeed, with his threat to “kill without mercy”, Ho may have committed a criminal offence under the Public Order Ordinance. Yuen Long district councillor Tsang Shu-wo, too, should fully understand that verbal threats can be easily put into action.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x