Advertisement
Hong Kong Basic Law
Opinion
Alex Lo

My Take | Fail mark for Lord Ashdown’s report on Hong Kong

Let’s have a beauty contest between post-Brexit Britain and post-1997 Hong Kong to see how local people choose to live in one or the other place. Everything else is just words

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
A 10-page Hong Kong Watch report, compiled by British peer Paddy Ashdown, suggested that recent events had raised concerns about the city’s rule of law. Photo: Nora Tam
Alex Loin Toronto

Hong Kong let Lord Ashdown in and he acted like a Justice of the Peace of olden days to listen to the little people. The report for his political group, Hong Kong Watch, is titled: “Hong Kong 20 Years On: Freedom, Human Rights and Autonomy Under Fire – A report on Lord Ashdown’s trip to Hong Kong: November 2017.”

He didn’t seem to recognise the irony, though. “I met with fellow legislators, legal experts and political activists in Hong Kong,” the British peer wrote. “It was my intention to listen to diverse voices during my trip in order to provide a balanced account.”

Advertisement
So he met lots of people and gave many speeches. His local friends such as Democrat Party lawmaker Ted Hui Chi-fung have been busy promoting his report, so much so that even Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor yesterday had to defend Hong Kong against allegations made in the report.

It looks like it’s still a free city. But is the report balanced? Well, that depends on whether you are “yellow” or “blue”.

It claims the Department of Justice may be interfering in the legal judgments of courts. That’s way out there.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x