Advertisement
Occupy Central
Opinion
Alex Lo

My Take | There’s just no pleasing some people

Hong Kong’s highest court has freed three Occupy protest leaders, yet the opposition is still crying foul

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
(L-R)Activist Alex Chow Yong-kang, Demosisto's Chairman Nathan Law Kwun-chung, and Demosisto's Secretary General Joshua Wong Chi-fung attend a radio programme at the Commercial Radio in Kowloon Tong. Photo: Nora Tam
Alex Loin Toronto
Some people just demand to have their cake and eat it, too. The city’s highest court has set free three Occupy protest leaders, a decision which presumably vindicates the independence of our judiciary.

But nary a word about that from those brave opposition figures who profess themselves to be our greatest defenders of the rule of law.

Instead, they round on the court judgment, starting with one of the freed activists, Joshua Wong Chi-fung, who denounced it as a “sugar-coated harsh punishment” and claimed “more and more activists will be locked up because of this harsh judgment”.

Law Lay Dream, an activist legal group, claimed the ruling breached international legal standards. I don’t know if the group’s English name is intentional, but it sounds a lot like a crude Cantonese phrase that roughly means self-degradation.

Advertisement

Former University of Hong Kong law don Michael Davis warned it could deter people from taking part in street protests.

The Progressive Lawyers Group said the ruling would further restrict people’s rights to peaceful assembly as guaranteed under the International Covenant on Civil Rights, to which Hong Kong is a signatory.

So, what’s this evil dictatorial ruling coming from our highest court? It merely upheld the lower court’s stricter sentencing guidelines.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x