
I must take issue with what I felt was an incomplete report ("Top doctor questions sky-high HK vet fees", January 7).
I feel qualified to write because I have been administratively and politically involved in the veterinary profession since arriving in Hong Kong 17 years ago.
The article highlights one big problem that exists in para-clinical professions here (such as pharmacists, physiotherapists, psychologists and vets). That is the all-pervading and uninformed influence of the medical profession in these professions. It seems that only in this city does the medical profession have such influence in the registration and business practices of the para-clinical professions.
Medical doctors pontificating on matters they do not understand and that do not concern them is obstructive for progress of the veterinary profession. This opinion is borne out by your report. Dr Chow Pak-chin's opinion is uninformed about the reality of veterinary practice.
There are huge differences between veterinary practice and medical practice.
The average veterinary GP, to meet consumer expectations, has to have ultrasound equipment, an X-ray machine, blood bank supplies, blood chemistry equipment, anaesthetic machine, hospital caging, emergency and critical care and pharmacy services as well as regular consultation facilities.