Advertisement
Advertisement
A general view of Chi Lin Nunnery in Diamond Hill. Photo: David Wong

What's being said on facebook.com/southchinamorningpost

A great idea. Property should be treated as a valuable community resource not to be wasted; not as an investment to be hoarded for greater profit. But developers feel no shame or responsibility to the community. Their only interest is profit and their personal wealth.

It needs to be extended to all vacant properties … then it will begin to bite!

Developers hire many smart professionals to help them, and they are not afraid of any punishment. They will gain all the same.

 

Harbour without a doubt. The nunnery is nice and I take photos there a lot, but it doesn't compare to the harbour.

Gov officials are very afraid that if it gets labelled as a heritage site they won't be able to reclaim all over it, thereby potentially losing billions of $$$.

I am from Hong Kong I will always vote for Victoria Harbour.

The harbour, with it named a world heritage site, it will be harder to demolish what we have left of our older "listed" buildings. Our skyline is unique!

Victoria Harbour, of course. why is our government so stupid?

I love Victoria Harbour, it's for all Hong Kong people, all visitors, we should protect it.

No doubt. Must be Victoria Harbour. I strongly disagree with the HK govt. All we HK residents should stand up for the harbour.

 

Build no more village houses for Heung Yee Kuk and indigenous males and use the workers from that scam.

7 million people in HK but still insufficient construction workers? So no unemployment in HK?

Post