Letters to the Editor, July 8, 2013
I am outraged at the audacious request by the Federation of Civil Service Unions for an amnesty for those in public service who engaged in cross-leasing of flats ("Call for amnesty over flat leasing", June 25). The reason given for the amnesty request was to allay the worries of those who earlier engaged in cheating on their housing allowance and are now at senior government level.

I am outraged at the audacious request by the Federation of Civil Service Unions for an amnesty for those in public service who engaged in cross-leasing of flats ("Call for amnesty over flat leasing", June 25). The reason given for the amnesty request was to allay the worries of those who earlier engaged in cheating on their housing allowance and are now at senior government level.
Let me get this straight: the union wants to protect the scheming, cheating civil servants, who may suffer the anxiety of not knowing if they may be next to be asked to answer for their sins.
Let's remember that people who were given the housing allowance earned above-average salaries and housing was meant to be a bonus, a sweetener, that was specifically given with a restriction of no personal gain.
That was not enough for those who cross-leased. They devised a way to personally gain beyond just accepting rent-free flats. Greed got the better of those civil servants and they should be held responsible.
As we now know, it was a widely used scheme and many now worry about their future - and so they should.
One way to allay their anxiety is to come clean; otherwise their punishment will be sleepless nights, which is natural justice.