• Tue
  • Sep 23, 2014
  • Updated: 12:05am
CommentLetters

Waste charge will be coupled with more recycling

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 08 October, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 08 October, 2013, 12:31am

Bob Carson questions the wisdom of charging for household waste in Hong Kong ("People will be charged for waste created by manufacturers", September 30). Let me explain more the reasoning for waste charging while also addressing his particular concerns.

I agree with him that charging for household waste can act only as an "incentive" for waste reduction to the extent that households have some discretion in the amount of goods they bring home and later need to dispose of. Many of us may feel that we have little such discretion. Our household consumables often come pre-packed.

Food is cheaper in bulk and may prove difficult to fully consume before it goes bad. Free magazines and advertising flyers quickly pile up, and glass or plastic containers are widely used for food and household products. To most of us our daily waste seems a necessary consequence of modern living. Thus, charging us for what cannot be avoided is, as Carson notes, "punitive".

The key reason why high volumes of household waste may seem "unavoidable" is we are not directly responsible for its disposal, and thus we have no incentive to shop more carefully, and manufacturers and retailers have little incentive to reduce packaging. At present, there is no incentive for us to avoid purchasing items that come overly-packed, accepting free printed items, buying perishables in quantities we cannot consume while still fresh.

We are not arguing that by so doing a household can reduce its waste to a small fraction of what it is today, but it certainly can do better. In Hong Kong's current situation of high disposal rate and lack of waste treatment facilities and landfill space, waste charging sends an important price signal.

Even more important is when a charging system is coupled with an expanded source separation of household waste for recycling, this encourages households to divert far more of this waste into "resource recovery systems" thus reducing the disposal charge.

The expansion of the separated-out raw materials for recycling will also help overcome the lack of residential block recycling that Carson notes. Cleaning before recycling should also be part of the recycle culture as it raises the value of recyclables.

Your correspondent may wish to note our producer responsibility schemes for plastics bags, and we will be introducing one on electronic waste, with glass bottles on the way. We will also be putting forward new policies on food waste and recycling.

Christine Loh, undersecretary for the environment

Share

More on this story

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

3

This article is now closed to comments

dynamco
this is the only way forward
forced source separation of waste and separation of food waste from the rest of the trash
Legislation was promised by 2007, now they say 2016
Nothing appeared during the tenure of frequent-flyer do-nothing waste-of-space Edward Yau
Actually the guy should get charged alongside Bowtie for misconduct in public office since the result of failing to act on the Environment cost many lives.
captam
There is still no talk of "stick".
Where is the penalty for failing to recycle ; paying for refuse disposal (by volume) and penalties for manufacturers with wasteful packaging?
If Taiwan and Japan can implement these, why not Hong Kong?
rpasea
Put in place a comprehensive recycling scheme first then start talking about waste charging.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or