• Tue
  • Dec 23, 2014
  • Updated: 1:08am

History shows that villagers will fight to protect land rights

PUBLISHED : Friday, 15 November, 2013, 3:36am
UPDATED : Friday, 15 November, 2013, 3:36am

At present 23 enclaves in country parks are covered by the Town Planning Board in its outline zoning plan.

This is just the beginning of zoning that will eventually affect 77 enclaves. The most controversial issue is that within the enclaves, there is a lot of private land.

Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing declared in the Legislative Council on October 9 that the zoning does not "deprive the ownership of the private land, nor would the incorporation revert the land back to the government", so compensation is not necessary. However it does deprive the owners of the right of "use and disposal" of their own land (Basic Law Article 105).

For example, in So Lo Pun, one of the enclaves surrounded by Plover Cove Country Park, 95 per cent of the zoned conservation area comprises private land and 35 per cent in the green belt zone is private.

In other words, without the permission of the board and related legislation, the owners are not allowed to use their own land as they see fit.

Historically, land ownership in the New Territories has always been a hot potato for the government. Back in 1899, the colonial government shrewdly converted the villagers' Qing dynasty title deeds to crown land and then leased it back to them.

The owners soon realised their changed ownership status and that they were being ordered to pay tax. There ensued a bloody confrontation between 39 villages and the government from Tai Po to Ping Shan.

The following decades were peaceful and then the owners suffered another loss of land when their peripheral areas were included in Hong Kong's country parks. Now the board wants to go one step further by denying their right of land use in the name of protecting nature.

It has never been the intention of indigenous villagers in the New Territories to confront the government nor to destroy the precious environment in the name of greed.

On the contrary, for centuries they have lived harmoniously with nature. However, when their private land is invaded, they will fight tenaciously to protect it. It happened several times in the past, and it will happen again.

To avoid escalating social unrest, the board must come up swiftly with sensible zoning plans and recommend reasonable compensation schemes.

Jane Wong, Fo Tan


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments


What a load of vested interest crxp
" II(a) The New Territories Small House Policy is a policy approved by the Executive Council and has been implemented since December 1972. It is formulated to allow an indigenous villager to apply for permission to erect FOR HIMSELF during his lifetime a small house on a suitable site WITHIN HIS OWN village."
What actually happens:
HYK lawyers find chip shop owner's son in London, cannot speak Cantonese or Hakka but with proof of ancestry
Pay him a deng uk fee of HKD 400k
Complete forms in his name + submit to above website address
Get approval
Build 3 storey house for HKD 450k
Sell house to CX pilot for 7 million
Chip shop owner's son stays in his homeland, UK
HYK Developer makes HKD 6 million profit
M Goi
Next, find similarly lineaged Chinese restaurant owner's son in Amsterdam
Repeat the above
M Goi HK Govt
I would have more respect for new territories villagers if they had some respect themselves for their land and didn't turn their plots into dumps and rubbish tips. It's all to do with the money. Please tell me how the scrapyards and container storage does not destroy the " precious environment" that the indigenous villagers love so much ?
Did Ms Wong have prior knowledge of the illegal action taken by "villagers" to block a public path on the HK Trailwalker route yesterday?
Ms. Wong - Do you want an apology with your compensation? Yes, do take up arms to protect your "property rights". I think HK could use a bit of comedy these days.
power of attorney to their legal representative (HYK lawyers)
Doesn't the chip shop owner's son have to come to HK to sign anything in person, or is the HK government obliging enough to allow everything to be done by international mail?


SCMP.com Account