• Wed
  • Sep 3, 2014
  • Updated: 10:56am
CommentLetters

Innovation and technology vital to Hong Kong's future competitiveness and productivity

PUBLISHED : Saturday, 26 April, 2014, 5:18am
UPDATED : Saturday, 26 April, 2014, 5:18am

On April 16, IT sector lawmaker Charles Mok was the mover of a joint statement backing the setting up of an innovation and technology bureau and urging fellow legislators not to mount a filibuster during the debate on this issue.

A filibuster is characterised as a form of obstruction in a legislature. It is a strategy employed by minority representatives to give them some leverage in defence of their constituents' interests. Executed shrewdly, it can be a David and Goliath tactic that can be successful.

Hong Kong has been criticised for lagging behind its rivals in cultivating a new sustainable economy. The performance of its economy over the last decade has been unimpressive. In real terms, average personal incomes have seen little or no growth, meaning Hongkongers' lives have not improved.

Also, Hong Kong's increasing economic reliance on mainland China is a cause for concern. If the SAR's free economy is homogenised with the mainland's towering planned macroeconomics, there could be unforeseen and dangerous consequences.

I am vice-chairman of a think tank advocating innovation and technology. Those lawmakers planning a filibuster need to be told that the only logical path to preserve Hong Kong's economic independence and core values lies with continuous enrichment in innovation and technology. They are vital to prolong the city's global competitiveness while maintaining its productivity against systemic risks such as an ageing workforce and obsolete human resources.

The proposed innovation and technology bureau can formulate policies to reinvent Hong Kong, help legislate against technology crimes and attract foreign investment and talent.

The innovation and technology sector was encouraged when the chief executive made good his campaign pledge to establish the bureau. Academics and professionals are ready to work with the new bureau chief and his team once they are appointed. Without this bureau, the future is bleak. While the existing technology infrastructure has achieved its intended role, a centralised architecture is missing to effectively harness strengths and remedy shortfalls.

Hong Kong was at risk when its manufacturing industry migrated to China. The finance industry was chosen as the next economic pillar to retain growth and stability. Stakeholders, putting aside their differences, helped transform Hong Kong into a global financial hub and reshaped the banking, insurance and asset management sectors. Hong Kong can repeat this success with innovation and technology.

Legislative Council members must consider Hong Kong's future before backing a filibuster.

Les Gee, vice-chairman, Invotech

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

2

This article is now closed to comments

Dao-Phooy
Given the performance of the Government the proposal for a new bureau is simply a waste of taxpayers's money. There will be no innovation or co-ordination because of the mindset of civil servants who will tie any proposals up in red tape. Government has been tried before - it is known as Cyberport! Any government involvement will be the kiss of death to the IT sector. What would be the role of the HK Productivity Council going forward (this is full of overpaid bureaucrats too!) How much duplication of effort do we need in HK? As for new legislation - dream on! The government couldn't even get desperately needed amendments to the Copyright Ordinance through Legco - the bill lapsed in 2012!
rpasea
Innovation is the life blood of any dynamic economy but the last place this will come from is yet another govt. department filled with paper pushers and meeting attenders and public consultation gatherers. The term "govt. innovation bureau" is the ultimate oxymoron, in fact. More likely it should be called "govt. slush fund for well connected insiders in the tech industry or anything close (or even not so close) bureau".
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or