Misunderstanding over legislation's role in tree management

In the report "'Twisted logic will mean tree massacres'" (September 8), Professor Jim Chi-yung said the government used "twisted logic" in deferring enactment of a tree law. I do not agree.

Briefly, tree legislation imposing mandatory requirements on tree inspection and specifying the qualifications of the tree care personnel is not a silver bullet. Legislation can never force a property owner to keep a tree, and any belief that this could be achieved is evidently "twisted logic": a fallacy that everyone will impassively follow the legislation.

The government maintains an open mind to initiatives that will not only quantifiably serve the required purposes, but also recognise the need for a balanced step-change management to enable transformation.

The Tree Management Office has short-, medium- and long-term strategies to develop responsible tree-risk management across sectors, disciplines, industries and the diverse spectrum of our community. With regard to property owners, we recently issued for stakeholder feedback the Draft Handbook on Tree Management, which will form part of the Building Management Ordinance. Under the ordinance, property owners are obligated to correctly manage and maintain all assets within their lot boundary. The handbook specifically sets out what is expected with respect to tree management.

Complementing the handbook is a broader education and awareness programme to maximise the strategic value of our work.

The government recognises that no single effort will resolve tree safety and achieve a zero-risk scenario; rather, it will take a range of combined measures to deliver an integrated approach to responsible tree risk management.