Advertisement
OpinionLetters

Letters to the Editor, February 19, 2016

5-MIN READ5-MIN
Primary and secondary pupils in Hong Kong schools work hard. Photo: SCMP Pictures
Letters

Doubts over standardised tests are valid

Lovelyn Wong (“Assessment serves useful purpose”, ­February 16) advises parents not to be too hasty in calling for an end to the Primary Three Territory-wide System Assessment (TSA).

Ms Wong argues that tests help reveal students’ weaknesses and helps teachers improve their instruction.

Advertisement

This argument has been used to justify increased testing in the US as well.

There is no ­evidence that it is true; in fact, studies done at the secondary school level comparing grades teachers give students and standardised tests show that grades are an excellent predictor of future academic success, and standardised tests do not add additional information.

Advertisement

There are, in addition, plausible reasons to think that ­teacher evaluation of students is ­better than standardised tests.

The repeated judgments of professionals who are with ­students every day is probably more valid than a test created by distant strangers and given only once.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x