Advertisement
OpinionLetters

Letters to the Editor, July 29, 2017

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Government Flying Service could have helped with accurate readings. Photo: Edward Wong
Letters

Observatory has tools but won’t use them

This is not another letter of criticism after Peter A. Tanner’s (“Storm warning but no sign of bad weather”, July 26), but a suggestion, not for the first time, that the scientists at the Hong Kong Observatory use their high-tech storm-detecting ­equipment instead of guessing.

First, why didn’t they task at least one of the Government ­Flying Service’s two weather reconnaissance aircraft to fly out to the storm to report back ­instantaneous readings of the winds? Their automated navigation equipment continuously resolves the triangle of velocities into readings of aircraft speed relative to the air, wind speed and ground speed.

Advertisement

Second, have they not got a Doppler Radar so they can read wind speeds instantaneously?

Instead, they seem to trust only the anemometers installed around the territory, of which only the Tap Mun station ­recorded a gust of 70 km/h.

Advertisement

To warrant a No 8 signal, a ­sustained wind of 63 km/h and above has to prevail, and yet none was apparently detected.

Macau held to a No 1 signal during the time the No 8 NW ­signal was in force in Hong Kong, and the centre of the storm crossed the Pearl River Delta to Macau’s side.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x