Advertisement
Legislative Council of Hong Kong
OpinionLetters

Ted Hui phone-snatch row points to a crisis of trust in Hong Kong politics

Reading Time:1 minute
Why you can trust SCMP
Ted Hui (centre), with fellow Democratic Party lawmakers James To Kun-sun (left) and Wu Chi-wai, at a press conference at the Legislative Council complex on April 25. Hui apologised for grabbing a civil servant’s mobile phone. Photo: K.Y. Cheng
Letters
I am writing to share my opinion on the article, “Lawmakers not monitored but merely ‘observed’, Hong Kong No 2 official Matthew Cheung says amid phone-snatch row” (April 28).

Nowadays, it has become common for lawmakers to try to delay a meeting by not entering the room, so that the quorum cannot be met. Therefore, important agenda and decisions may be held up, and the meeting cannot proceed smoothly.

The government says it tried to solve this problem by having officials “observe” the movement of lawmakers to ensure that they were not leaving a meeting just to prevent a quorum.

Advertisement
In this case, Democratic Party lawmaker Ted Hui Chi-fung was accused of grabbing a female Security Bureau official’s phone while she was trying to marshal lawmakers into a meeting to discuss a government bill.

Hui objected to her “recording the entry and exit time of lawmakers” and called it a breach of privacy to have a civil servant monitor them.

Advertisement

I believe there a connection between the acts of the government and lawmakers. If lawmakers did not try to delay meetings, the government would not have to record their movements on phones. Hence, the imprudent act of Hui and the mental distress experienced by the female officer would not have occurred.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x