Advertisement
Advertisement
China's foreign minister Wang Yi waits for the arrival of European Council president Charles Michel prior to a meeting at the Europa building in Brussels on December 17. Photo: AP
Opinion
Opinion
by Andrei Lungu
Opinion
by Andrei Lungu

What kind of Europe does China want to deal with: friend, business partner or strategic rival?

  • Despite the growing divide between the EU and the US under Trump, Beijing is in danger of losing Europe, which cannot simply ignore human rights issues or China’s failure to open its markets

China is slowly losing Europe. This is happening even though transatlantic relations are at a low point and right when the European Union is finally aiming to become a global geopolitical player.

Ursula von der Leyen, the new president of the European Commission, has made it clear over the past months that she wants to lead a “geopolitical commission” and one of its priorities will be to “define our relations with a more self-assertive China”. 

This means that the next few years will be decisive for China. Over the past three years, even in the context of EU-US disagreements and tensions, China’s ties to Europe have frayed, with the EU branding it “an economic competitor ” and “a systemic rival”, while numerous voices on the European continent are calling for a more confrontational attitude against what they perceive as a rising illiberal adversary.

Beijing has been very slow in understanding and responding to these developments, taking few measures to save its relations with Europe. If current trends continue, China will lose Europe, no matter how strong their economic ties remain.

As its relations with the US are unlikely to go back to their pre-2017 “normal”, China’s leaders will now have to decide what kind of geopolitical Europe they want. Do they want Europe to be a friend, a simple business partner or a geopolitical adversary?

This choice might not be China’s to make, but it can do a great deal to influence it. Yet, to do this, it must abandon its current approach and implement a strategy of understanding and engagement, with a long-term focus.

This should begin with economics, where European requests are also in China’s national interest. Already disillusioned by past empty promises, European governments and companies simply want greater market access and a level playing field.

Why the trade war may soon be the least of China’s worries

Providing this wouldn’t be a compromise, but smart economic policy – it would mean more choices and cheaper services for Chinese consumers, more jobs for Chinese workers and more opportunities for development and innovation for the Chinese economy.

Without reforms and reciprocity, China should expect future EU restrictions on trade, investments, acquisitions or its procurement market, while the EU will gear up to compete against Chinese companies, especially state-owned and subsidised firms.

China can begin by swiftly finalising negotiations for its Comprehensive Agreement on Investment with the EU, which began more than six years ago. Instead of aiming to provide as few concessions as possible, it should focus on the long term, seeing such concessions as an investment in the economy and stronger EU-China ties.

Providing greater access for European companies would also signal to the US that more things can be won through cooperation than trade wars. Once the investment agreement is signed, Beijing should invite Brussels to begin negotiations on a free-trade pact, fast-tracking them.

What’s ahead for new EU commission as it addresses imbalances in China ties

Chinese leaders also need to understand that, as the EU is transforming itself into a geopolitical actor, it is extremely wary of perceived attempts to divide it. Beijing has been slow to receive the signals about its bilateral ties with countries such as Hungary and Greece, for instance. The economic or political benefits of such moves are dwarfed by the damage inflicted on China’s image in Brussels and Berlin.
Chinese President Xi Jinping visits Piraeus Port in Greece on November 11. Photo: Xinhua

On the whole, Beijing needs more foresight and a greater willingness to put future benefits above short-term gains and interests. China’s relations with European countries have been affected by numerous developments.

China’s vision of a digital highway into Europe will raise hackles

Take Sweden, an influential EU member, whose ties to China have experienced a downturn in the past few years. The main cause is the fate of Swedish citizen Gui Minhai , who is being detained in China. Chinese leaders might believe this is an internal matter, but they also need to understand that even “internal” affairs can have external consequences.

Swedish Culture and Democracy Minister Amanda Lind presents the Tucholsky Prize to publisher Gui Minhai, in Stockholm on November 15. Sweden has rejected the Chinese ambassador’s criticism of Ms Lind’s participation in the award ceremony. Photo: TT News Agency via AP

One person cannot possibly be so important to be worth sacrificing political and economic relations with an entire country. Chinese leaders have to understand that neither Sweden, nor other European countries, can be forced to ignore human rights.

Neither China, nor the Communist Party would have suffered negative consequences if Gui had been freed and allowed to return to Sweden, and the entire saga would have been avoided.

Taking a short-sighted approach to issues will continue to drive Europe and China further apart. Just as Europe sometimes needs to do a better job at understanding China so, too, Beijing must understand the value that European people and governments place on human rights.

Why Trump’s tariffs might not forge a China-EU trade alliance

The situations in Xinjiang and Hong Kong have had a profound effect on China’s image in Europe. It is far from clear that such foreign policy consequences have been considered in the initial stages of Beijing’s decision-making process. China can maintain trade relations with Europe, but it will never become a geopolitical partner if Europeans see it as an authoritarian state abusing human rights and threatening liberal values.

Even the ongoing debates about Huawei in Berlin and other European capitals show that, no matter how disappointed by the US, many European politicians are wary of an authoritarian government and will ultimately side with Washington.
Trump has created a fault line between the US and Europe and some EU leaders want to take advantage of it to give the union more strategic autonomy. This gives China a unique opportunity to strengthen relations with Europe at a time when it becomes more influential on the world stage. But the reverse is happening: Europe is beginning to take a tougher stance against China.

If Chinese leaders want to prevent a future united front between the US and a stronger EU, they need to be bold and develop a new strategy for Europe, focusing on the long-term geopolitical landscape, which is far more important than short-term political and economic interests.

Andrei Lungu is president of The Romanian Institute for the Study of the Asia-Pacific (RISAP)

Post