Advertisement
Advertisement
A currency trader walks by the screen showing the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) at a foreign exchange dealing room in Seoul on July 5. It has not been a good year so far for Asian markets. Photo: AP
Opinion
The View
by Richard Harris
The View
by Richard Harris

Figuring out today’s messy stock markets takes a dose of Harry Markowitz’s modern portfolio theory

  • The last quarter was dominated by narratives of rising interest rates and inflation, yet consumers are spending, job vacancies abound and house prices are firm
  • What to make of this is unclear, but Markowitz’s work would suggest a robust, long-term portfolio of equities and bonds, perhaps rebalancing every few years

Harry Markowitz, one of the first researchers to put rigour into investment decision-making, died on June 22 at age 95. Rightly regarded as the father of modern financial analysis, his life neatly spanned the entire lifetime of financial research.

By coincidence, in Markowitz’s birth year of 1927, a frustrated Alfred Cowles commissioned an investigation into the inaccuracy of stock recommendations to his wealthy family. Cowles’ paper, published in 1933, was titled “Can Stock Market Forecasters Forecast?”. His next paper, “Stock Market Forecasting”, showed that such forecasts were “indefinite” and usually driven by the narrative of the day.

The young Markowitz was a mathematician looking for a PhD topic and a chance meeting led him to research the financial markets. He realised that contemporary investors looked only at returns, so he introduced the concept of risk (defined by probabilities) that can be visualised as a line on a graph that plots return against risk.

The concept Markowitz put forward was to strike a balance between asset returns and market risks, instead of focusing solely on returns. He used a quantitative framework to analyse the merits of combining different assets. This “efficient frontier” illustrated that in stable markets, it is possible to get a little more return at a little less risk – by diversifying.

Markowitz encapsulated diversification mathematically in his 1952 paper “Portfolio Selection”, from which came the term “modern portfolio theory”. In the same year, he published “The Utility of Wealth”, an early tilt towards behavioural economics. In two papers, published at the tender age of 25, he established financial economics and touched upon the two major topics of classical and behavioural finance.

It led to a lifelong association with the Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics and a Nobel Prize in economics in 1990. Financial economics research is full of irony, as the great economist Milton Friedman initially refused to give Markowitz his PhD because finance was “not economics”.

Economist and Nobel Prize for Economics winner Harry Markowitz, pictured during a visit to City University in Hong Kong on February 20, 1995, created modern portfolio theory. Photo: SCMP
Markowitz inspired such Nobel laureates as Eugene Fama (originator of the efficient market hypothesis), William Sharpe (creator of the Sharpe ratio of portfolio risk and return) and Fisher Black and Myron Scholes (of Black-Scholes model fame – a formula used to price derivatives). Scholes is still going strong and spoke in Hong Kong on Monday. Old financial economists never die – they just expire at maturity.
Another irony is that brilliant thinking has caused these wise men to eschew the benefits of asset research and extol the benefits of long-term passive investment. That is, stay diversified in the market and trade rarely.

This approach has worked unexpectedly well in the first half of this year, which saw the technology-heavy Nasdaq index soar a whopping 32 per cent on the artificial intelligence narrative. It shaded Russia’s Moscow exchange, which was up 30 per cent, although the rouble fell by nearly as much against the US dollar in that period. Japan’s Nikkei index was up 29 per cent, but the yen fell about 10 per cent against the dollar.

The Nasdaq MarketSite in New York on June 30. The blowout rally in tech giants gained further traction last week, with the Nasdaq 100 poised to notch a record first half of a year. Photo: Bloomberg

Closer to home, Asian markets lagged. Ever-bullish India’s Nifty 50 was up only about 8 per cent, Shanghai saw a rise of about 3 per cent and the China A50 – a key bellwether of the domestic economy – was actually down nearly 5 per cent. Hong Kong held up the wooden spoon, with a disappointing fall of 7 per cent in last six months.

The Nasdaq is now 80 per cent higher than its mid-pandemic low in March 2020 while the Hang Seng is more than 15 per cent below where it was then. At least Hong Kong is likely to be more defensive if the recession finally does come as it is too late to sell now.

What to make of this would surely tax even Markowitz. Despite modern portfolio theory, markets still confound investors. The last quarter has been dominated by narratives of rising interest rates and inflation causing recession and value destruction.
And yet outside China, the consumer is spending hard, job vacancies abound and house prices are surprisingly firm – the opposite of a traditional economic forecast. It is tempting to say this time is different, but we know that is not true. It’s just that long bull markets die hard.

China must not be tempted to repeat the easy money mistakes of the West

Markowitz’s research would suggest designing and holding a robust, long-term portfolio of equities and bonds, perhaps rebalancing every few years as key investment themes such as technology emerge. In the last year, modern portfolio theory would have outperformed those predicting a recessionary downturn that began in January 2022. That market decline ended in September, when the current S&P 500 bull run started.

As it happens, these reversals have occurred on quarter ends – an observation that I have half-seriously incorporated into Harris’ Law of Quarterly Reversals. The question is whether we could see another reversal from the end of June or if we have to wait until September.

The supreme irony of financial economics is that I have just finished a PhD in narrative finance, researching the very stories Cowles railed against nearly a century ago. If you can’t beat them, join them.

Dr Richard Harris is chief executive of Port Shelter Investment and is a veteran investment manager, banker, writer and broadcaster and financial expert witness

Post