BOOK REVIEW

Book review: The Butcher’s Trail looks at how Balkan war criminals were finally brought to justice

The hunt for Yugoslav warlords, the long process of bringing them to a reckoning, and the international ramifications are brilliantly captured by Julian Borger in this superb account

PUBLISHED : Monday, 28 March, 2016, 5:01pm
UPDATED : Monday, 28 March, 2016, 5:01pm

The Butcher’s Trail

by Julian Borger

Other Press

4.5/5 stars

Justice looks best from a distance, its elegant form unblemished by compromise and expedience. So at first glance the story of the Balkan warlords from the 1990s being held to account is satisfying: every single one faced justice.

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, known as the Hague tribunal, got their men – and one woman. It took until 2011 for the last to be rounded up; and Radovan Karadžic, the bouffant brute who led the Bosnian Serbs, only last week was convicted of genocide and crimes against humanity and sentenced to 40 years in prison.

Balkan blockade: Serbia bans cross-border trucks from Croatian as refugee row triggers old enmity

Some hold that slow justice is no justice, but when it comes to international justice more patience is required. From the murk of the battlefield, the Hague tribunal hints tantalisingly at rare moral clarity, the principle that some crimes are so vile there can be no hiding place for the culprits. And vile many of the crimes certainly were.

Investigators digging a mass grave near the River Sava found skeletons with rubber tubes around the arm bones. The victims’ flesh had long perished, so at first the investigators thought the tubes were restraints. Then a horrific realisation dawned: the pipes were intravenous lines, the victims hospital patients dragged from their wards still plugged into drips, too weak to need restraint, too frail to defend themselves.

What Julian Borger has achieved in this superb account of the tribunal’s manhunt is much more than a litany of these crimes. It is an elegantly written, powerfully convincing reckoning of how the world stumblingly faced up to a reality that should not have been: war crimes in modern Europe. He focuses on the manhunt as a single thread in the complex Balkan story, partly as a way to reveal how that region influences our wider world today, through rendition, jihad – and the delicate flower of international law.

I worked as a reporter in Bosnia alongside Borger and know him as a journalist you can bet the farm on. Yet his book is much more than long-form journalism. There is no romanticism in his account of the tribunal’s founding. It was set up as a compromise, as a way for the world to do something to stop the death camps and slaughter then being perpetrated mostly by extremist Serbs. The west, with cold war attitudes still frozen in place, simply could not work out how to deal with such a conflict beyond the old Iron Curtain.

“The court came into being as an exercise in penance and distraction, the unstable product of high ideals and low politics,” Borger writes. “The mass atrocities would not be prevented, but they would be judged after the victims were dead.”

For almost two years after the 1995 Dayton peace accords ended the Bosnian war, low standards prevailed, with western governments too jumpy to go after alleged war criminals even though they had thousands of peacekeeper “boots on the ground”. Italian troops routinely turned their backs when the motorcade carrying Karadžicćpassed by, allowing him to escape justice for a further 12 years.

The bigger powers were in effect shamed out of their paralysis in Bosnia when Polish special forces, serving in neighbouring Croatia, boldly carried out the first detention operation of a war crimes suspect in June 1997. Their courage proved contagious. Weeks after Tony Blair’s government replaced the risk-averse Conservatives, the SAS were ordered to seize three Bosnian Serbs. The results were mixed: one dead, one escaped and one captured using a ruse de guerre that came close to Britain itself breaching a Geneva convention.

The drama of the arrest operations keeps the pages turning, not least when a later SAS operation goes wrong with the arrest of a pair of identical twins– the wrong identical twins.

Throughout The Butcher’s Trail there is a sense of the Hague tribunal succeeding in spite of, not because of, the international community. Poorly funded to begin with and undermanned, it became effective because a small number of committed individuals were prepared to explore the bounds of international law: the chain-smoking prosecutor, the tubby police sergeant from Stratford, the US special forces officer who carried a gorilla suit in his baggage.

Borger is honest about the muddles and misunderstandings. He recounts America’s early muscle-bound efforts to go after targets. Planes laden with special forces and staff officers keen to get in on the action were a dead giveaway when they flew into Bosnia. No surprise that the targets vanished into thin air by the time the operational juggernaut creaked into action.

The early snatch operations – target cars being rammed from behind and pushed into pre-arranged ambush positions – provide great military theatre, but Borger shows how the greatest scalps for the tribunal were won through diplomatic finesse: the moderate leaders of Bosnia, Croatia and Serbia were told that a precondition of those tiny new nations being welcomed as equals by the international community was the surrender of war crimes suspects.

Borger’s description of the fall of Slobodan Miloševic, the Serbian leader largely responsible for the extreme nationalism that destroyed Yugoslavia, is excellent. Miloševic’s erstwhile allies in Belgrade turned on him one by one until he suffered the 21st-century version of defenestration: he was handed over meekly to the tribunal, cuffed and cowed.

The most poignant part for me is Borger’s discussion of how the war criminals got on once incarcerated in Holland. Ivo Andric famously wrote that “Bosnia is a country of fear and hatred”, yet in a Dutch prison exercise yard the same men who 20 years earlier slaughtered each other would happily play football and cook each other meals using recipes from home.

The Guardian