• Tue
  • Sep 23, 2014
  • Updated: 2:19pm

English Schools Foundation

The English Schools Foundation (ESF) operates five secondary schools, nine primary schools and a school for students with special educational needs across Hong Kong Island, Kowloon and the New Territories. It is the largest international educational foundation in Asia. 

LifestyleFamily & Education

Overpricing English-medium schools could hurt Hong Kong's future, say critics

The loss of government subsidy will make schools teaching in English too costly for many professionals, who will take their talents elsewhere

PUBLISHED : Sunday, 28 July, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Sunday, 28 July, 2013, 5:56pm

As his two daughters enjoy their summer holiday, architect Marcin Klocek has school on his mind. The prospect of soaring fees at international schools has left him contemplating sending his children back to his native Poland for their education.

Both his daughters, aged seven and 12, attend the financially troubled Discovery College. Faced with the need to repay a construction loan to the English Schools Foundation (ESF), the Lantau-based college has announced plans to increase fees by 53 per cent over the next five years, taking them above HK$130,000 per year for primary-school pupils and HK$180,000 for those in Year 7 to Year 11.

Discovery College parents, who have formed a 150-strong concern group to fight the fee increase, are not the only ones worried about rising fees.

Parents whose children begin studying at the four kindergartens, five secondary and nine primary schools run by the ESF after 2016 will find the fees much higher than they are now as the government begins phasing out its subsidy to ESF schools.

With international school places in short supply, the loss of subsidy has raised questions about the future of English-medium education and concern that a lack of school places could hit the city's competitiveness by deterring talented international professionals from moving to the city.

The ESF board last month quietly accepted the loss of the government subsidy, long frozen at HK$283 million per year. But many of the foundation's supporters argue that the loss of the government cash will add to a worrying trend - the widening gap between those who can afford quality English-medium education and those who cannot.

The government support, which started in 1967, allowed the ESF to offer affordable education in English to people from all ethnic backgrounds, with a growing number of local families enrolling their children in recent years.

But the subsidy has long been questioned, with critics saying the funding is unfair. The government argues that continuing to offer a subsidy would fly in the face of its policy of not providing recurrent subsidies to schools which, for the most part, do not offer the local curriculum.

As announced by ESF chairman Carlson Tong Ka-shing, fees for new students at ESF schools will rise by 23 per cent, to more than HK$84,000 a year for primary-school pupils and to HK$120,000 for secondary-school students, in 2016. It is not known yet what the fees will be after that year. Discovery College, an independent school run by an arm of the ESF, sets its fees separately.

One single mother whose son is in Year 9 at West Island School and who asked not to be named said: "Not everyone is on expatriate deals or has corporate support. I have to find the fees."

She is fortunate - her child will continue to benefit from the subsidy for the rest of his time at school. But the question is: how affordable will the ESF be to parents in future?

"It will be a pity if ESF schools become like other international schools," says a parent of a Sha Tin College pupil, who also prefers to remain anonymous. "It has proved to be a very successful model where students are not pressurised, do not learn by memorisation and enjoy various extra-curricular activities. We treasure this model a lot. It is not elitist, but yet it is successful."

The ESF "model" has attracted many local families, who are put off by the deteriorating standard of English and the immense academic pressure in local schools and are concerned about stiff competition for admission into the small number of elite schools in the local system. Of the 13,000 ESF students, 70 per cent are from families of permanent residents.

Expatriate families are unlikely to submit their children to the pressurised environment in local schools.

"I have asked local children if they are happy in school; 100 per cent of them say no, because of homework etc," said Bob Kraft, an American pastor who has lived in Hong Kong for 25 years. "It is really a matter of adopting an educational model that people understand is healthy for families. From what I have heard, the ESF model is a better alternative. The removal of subvention is going to hurt the economy of Hong Kong."

The economic argument has also been made by various international chambers of commerce, which argue that a lack of affordable, high-quality international schooling will make it tougher for the city to attract the international talent it needs to sustain itself as a financial centre.

Christopher Hammerbeck, executive director of the British Chamber of Commerce, called on the government to consider other forms of subsidy, for example one given out on a per-pupil basis, instead of withdrawing support once and for all.

"Not all the expatriates working here are compensated for their families' expenses," he said. "ESF has been able to fill the middle-priced area that lower-paid executives will find extremely difficult to find after 2016 when the full increase takes place."

He stressed that maintaining affordable education options for the children of middle-tier executives was crucial to Hong Kong's competitiveness as a global financial future.

As a result of the changing economic landscape, today's expatriate community is more diverse than ever, he says. "The French community has doubled in the past four years, there are more Italians coming, we have the Polish chamber of commerce setting up, a Romanian chamber of commerce setting up; people from Africa, South Africa are coming. The challenge for the government is to provide the right sort of education for executives in the international business sector."

Janet De Silva, who chairs the American Chamber of Commerce's education affairs group, agrees.

"An affordable, high-quality, English-medium education option is sought by the many small and medium-sized enterprise members of the American Chamber and is sought by many Hong Kong residents throughout the territory," she said.

"Hong Kong is a vibrant city of enterprise and this vibrancy is made possible by a well-educated workforce. Ensuring our next generation has the skills and education to continue to be a competitive force for Hong Kong is essential."

Legislators have also taken issue with the future of affordable English-medium education. Civic Party legislator Kenneth Chan Ka-lok accused the government of being short-sighted, saying it was "immoral" to take away the ESF's subvention. "Does the government want to see all English-language schools turning into Harrow [International School]?" he asked at a Legislative Council education panel meeting earlier this month.

The government acknowledges the problem of a shortage of international school places, with education chief Eddie Ng Hak-kim warning last year of a shortfall of 4,200 international primary school places in the next five years.

But Klocek feels that he has few options. Though far from pleased with the depth of knowledge his children are acquiring from school, he shuns paying even higher fees.

"Fees go up in Hong Kong every year,'' he said. "It is less likely I would send my daughters to other, more expensive international schools without being sure they are better. The most likely option would be to move them to Polish schools - which are free and of good quality - if anything.''

But he is also worried about the disruptions to his daughters' live should they relocate to Europe.

With expensive international schools like Harrow - which charges fees of up to HK$159,800 per year, with more for boarders - off the table, one alternative for Klocek and other parents are schools under the Direct Subsidy Scheme.

Direct-subsidy schools receive government funding on a per-student basis and enjoy autonomy in management and fee-setting. Many offer the International Baccalaureate curriculum, widely recognised by universities around the world. The elite Diocesan Boys' School, for example, has 63 IB places, but across the city such places are in limited supply.

Direct-subsidy schools are required to reserve at least half of their places for pupils studying the local curriculum leading to the Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education exam.

"We are at full capacity and can take in at most five ESF students a year (should they want to switch),"says Cheung Siu-ming, principal of Creative Secondary School, a direct-subsidy school offering the IB curriculum.

Cheung believes the ESF subvention should remain, and echoes the concern that the ESF will cash in on its proven academic record and reputation to become even more expensive.

"Should this happen, this would only widen the gap between the rich and the poor in Hong Kong," he warned. "Only the rich will have access to better-quality education. This is already happening. The gap between public and private schools is getting bigger. The government needs to increase its spending on education."


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Copy of comment on
Harrow School draws new families, pushing up rents in Tuen Mun
scmp, property, Jul 31
pslhk Jul 31st 2013
People’s backgrounds differ
some more interesting than others
I respect them equally because
very very few could be thoroughly bad
Harrow reminds me of three experiences
(1) In two separate summers
a daughter attended Harrow and Ms Porter’s (Connecticut)
To do it again, I’d definitely opt for the latter.
(2) A single mother who has never married
having applied to HIS for her 3rd and 4th sons
asked the father (whom I know) of her 1st and 2nd sons
whether he wants her to apply for “theirs” too.
(3) What next after daughter, productive affairs and Harrow:
Churchill, of course, I mean
Pamela Churchill Harriman
Character building surely has a very British meaning
Sunday 212
“International teachers are paid around 4x more than local,
because the demand for this rare expertise far exceeds supply”
I’ve some idea what this “rare expertise” involves:
Spoon-feeding academic inepts who can’t compete in the local system
Training children to act more confident than justified by their actual skill levels
Blowing the trumpet about sham character building to cover up academic deficiency
Demeaning local education as “rote learning” for self-promotion
To instill fear about demonized local education thus creating
an insular mentality to make students / parents community reliant
Misrepresenting “international” exams and education,
easy and simple stuffs, as something superior
Play acting high quality so as to raise the image of their students
“knock, knock”, that’s how it sounds tapping their cheeks
That’s why the same teachers are paid less as NETs
and more when work as “international” teachers
Thousands of personnel like that
line up every day for unemployment welfare
in English speaking countries
(1) Anyone who has read whymak’s musings
other than those posted in scmp comments
would find the writer a romantic humanist
His emphases on scientific disciplines in these columns
are probably meant to serve as a reminder
that arguments should be different from utterances
Refer also to Iris Chan’s excellent exposition in today’s leader letter
Technical skills and social skills are not mutually exclusive
(2) If you more or less substitute “Latin” and “European vernaculars”
for “English” and “Chinese / native” in your reply to my comment
you’d have my reply to your comment, from a historical perspective.
This is so looking like what is happening with flat price.
Can't help to think that hot money (better not specify from where) is keeping everything up, now the new motto is more expensive is better.
Why do you find it better not to specify the origin of hot money?
Everybody knows its the FRB
or the FED, as everybody accepts that
in fact if you follow the motto it advertises on the greenback
As FED refers also to the US federation
Given the Jehuwah / Jesus relationship of FRB and money
FED = FRB = GOD = USA = $$$
Holy Spirit is on holiday
That’s why FRB and Money
are causing so much confusions in the USA
Beaker, sjfore: Your hate comments on China belittle yourself and damage your credibility. Shanghai PISA scores stand head and shoulders about every OECD country, not just overall but in every subject. With an unbiased sample selected from 20 million, the results have more significance than test scores from many advanced Western countries.
This year even rural areas of China have been selected for PISA tests. The results are being compiled. We will see if students in Chinese backwaters are like Hong Kong student demonstrators, brainwashed zombies capable only of learning by rote and chanting political slogans.
whymak,Have you ever asked why a single selected school district in Shanghai, a city, was chosen to compare in ranking vs. complete nations in your parroting propaganda from China? You're that daft to just accept what is spoon fed you? The top student of each class in Chinese education is NOT the smartest, hardest working kid. It is the best parrot who can regurgitate back exactly what was fed in. I know this. I examined what a 16 yr old son of a friend was studying, "Electrical circuits". He spent hours memorizing one circuit. He'd be worthless if someone took one resistor out of that circuit because all that memory would go to waste. Come back on that, with your PISA scores whymak. Use logic and reasoning and supporting facts, not checking on my credibility. I came from a system of analytical thought. Can you see that in my writing? I cannot see any analytical skills in your comments, always calling into question others "credibility". It is like that is the same move you have and you use it for all your comments. I don't need your trust to show I know what I am talking about.
Since PISA uses scientific sampling to select 15 year-olds for reading comprehension, math and sciences tests and Hong Kong is always among the top 3 in overall score, is there any substance for SCMP readers' disparaging racist comments about Chinese children learning by rote?
It behooves us to ask if all those well compensated native English language teachers, products of inferior PISA rankings in their home countries, are indeed late bloomers who had become better teachers than our local Chinese teachers.
On the other hand, I agree with the observation that Hong Kongers have a giant inferiority complex. They have been brainwashed into the belief that only the English language could convey good reasoning, logic and not the least, slogans and dogmas of the Universal Suffrage Cult.
I can’t say early bloomers are better than late ones. I have a hunch the formers are overtly attributed by a biased measurement. Instant genius can be created by rote learning but their performance can peak quickly. Late bloomers aging into maturity are more dependable.
Btw, it's a misconception that only asian's adopt rote learning/memorisation. In western curriculums that are exam-focused, a high degree of memorisation in certain subjects are required to "reproduce" what you learn in the classroom. The western (uk in specific) is certainly not a superior curriculum, whatsoever!
Not all rote learning is bad. Traditional nursery rhythms with mostly repetitious stanza and music surely get a toddler’s attention and quickly learns to sing along.
Rote learning? I memorised all the "stuff" I learned at school, and I got excellent grades, which then got me into an excellent university so I could memorise more "stuff", then I got an excellent job, due to my superior memorisation skills. But then, some things suddenly killed my self-esteem....well, did I know how to deal with people? Did I know how to negotiate? Did i know how to sell? did i know how to assert myself? did i know how to work in a team? Did i know how to smooze the boss? Did I know how to calculate a real NPV? Did I even know I was in the right job? The real world was the real school for me. Without any previous "education" in these areas, it was a tough and lonely place to be.
There were no indications of racism in any of the previous comments. You are the first to mention this term. Do you have a race issue yourself?
High maths and science scores does not mean you can think creatively, come up with non-conventional and new ways of thinking, doing and inventing things. A society progresses with new inventions, new ideas, etc, this is not what you learn from getting all the questions right. Questions that already have an answer book, in other words questions where the answers have already been found and there is nothing new!
whymak, very well said
In reply to "Hong Kongers have a giant inferiority complex.
They have been brainwashed into the belief
that only the English language could convey good ..."
I have in recent years tended to gloss over grammatical
and prepositional rules that I learnt in hi school
playing with the deconstruction of the English language,
relying on words and syntax like Chinese
and focusing on substance and not form.
(note the phrasal separation of “have” from “tended”)
95% of HK is Cantonese-speaking,
not a single English speaking opportunity
in 95% of their social activities
Hybridization is a way for English to survive in HK
subject to tests for clarity and not traditional grammar correctness
At the receiving end, NETs may not enjoy
the recreational part of linguistic procreation
that’s in fact similar to what one gets
in biological procreation.
Being a conservative
my advice to students is
first learn and master the basic
then take it further
with bold and meaningful modifications
Yes, hk is 95% speaking and 95% social activities, but why then are all business documents in English too? We can do away with this entire debate, simply by removing English usage from Hong Kong. But, why then is the reality that documents and even some meetings are held in English by Chinese native? Every native speaks and writes Chinese in Hong Kong, so what is holding Hong Kong back from removing English as a second official language?
Many of the next generation of our family were educated in so-called elite local schools such as SJC. A former SJC classmate and MIT graduate now retired to Hong Kong had his active career in North America. While there, he required his 3 children to study at home a parallel Hong Kong syllabus in math and sciences. Here is the bottom line: all graduated from Berkeley, 2 at the age of 18. One, a member of Canadian Math Olympiad team went on to Harvard and another got an MD degree at 22. I will be brief with our second generation, with the most outstanding one graduated #1 in Berkeley's School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering. Need more anecdotes?
Unhappy with too much homework? How do these well-adjusted outstanding professionals fit the figments of imagination of self-hate bananas and China bashing expats?
Being academically successful may guarantee you a cushy well-paid job, with all the comforts and prestige attached it, but do you have a passion for life? Do you wake up in the morning grateful for the sounds of the birds outside your window? Do look at you wife/husband/kids every morning and thank god, that he gave you these wonderful people in your life? Do you smile going to work every day, thankful for having a fulfilled life?
Few points of clarifications:
1. Good syllabus is good syllabus. It doesn’t say how it should be learned – rote or otherwise.
2. A syllabus that consists only science and math can falsely made a future scientist and mathematician but missing out a possible musician or artist to be.
3. A skill to reasoning opens more doors in ALL disciplines than a skill in rote learning of facts.
4. College bound shouldn’t be the sole success measure for a school education.
5. Local education lacks in equality, diversification and funding -- pretty much still a colonial culture.
""I have asked local children if they are happy in school; 100 per cent of them say no, because of homework etc," said Bob Kraft, an American pastor who has lived in Hong Kong for 25 years."
Any person quoting a mythical 100% figure is an absolute 100% moron. I suppose his flock is also 100% happy with myths about Moses parting the Red Sea and Lazarus arising from the dead.
I also presume that Bob Kraft speaks Cantonese well enough and have sufficient skills in statistics to do his personal survey.
The HK education system is definitely in need of reform. There is a good reason why IB, IGCSE, or other curriculum are preferred to the local DSE.
You may demand what you consider your rights
But rectification of misinformation is needed for fruitful discussion
(a) local curriculum promotes rote learning / has too much homework
From the experiences of my children who each attended a different local (so-called elite) school, we had only a case of too much homework – in F2 and 3, a daughter had so much art work to do that parents often had to help in paper cutting and coloring late into early morning. Otherwise I’d say that their teachers were rather lazy in giving them homework. One of them in the final high school years, had ridiculously few reading assignments and was required to do composition once every five or six weeks. Light homework allowed them to do a lot other interesting and inspiring things. They never attended any private academic tutorial. But the daughter (BSc, UC Berkeley) has become a good painter from a private teacher.
(b) local curriculum is deeply unpopular with Chinese parents
Some overseas “Chinese” parents return, or send their children back, for the HK curriculum, thinking that what they have over there (international?) lacks depth for intellectual / character development. I and there are people I know who would much prefer the local curriculum for our children to the so-called “international” curriculum. As an aside, read Wang Dan’s autobiography and decide for yourself what is “bad”, mainland curriculum or bigots' bias
(c) Your groundless allegations about “patriotic principles”, Arthur Li and Cyd Ho are purely your personal imagination unsupported by any evidence.
My evidence re Cyd Ho
CH ignored my attempts to contact her
after I’d forwarded a letter to her
I’ve a different experience with Emily Lau
who personally returned my phone call
The protégé has much to learn from her mentor
whom I much respect despite our differences
All children should be treated equally, but Government is creating huge inequality in education by its purblind adherence to so-called "patriotic" principles. It was all started by the bigot Arthur Li because he wanted a convenient foreign scapegoat to make himself popular in his ambition to become Chief Executive. The racist policy was supported by hypocrites like Cyd Ho on the Legco education sub committee, pretending to be in favour of the subvention but secretly gleeful at having a swipe at the "****s". My kids go to ESF schools, they were born here, I am self employed with no allowances so even though UK born, I am NOT an EXPATRIATE. As a taxpayer for 30 years I believe my kids are entitled to the same dollar amount of subsidy given to other children in Government or DSS schools. The local curriculum is deeply unpopular with Chinese parents because it promotes wrote learning and has too much homework. My children should not be discriminated against because they are not native Chinese speakers. The Government funded English medium schools have no places. The ESF Board has not been given much choice but frankly, their climbdown was a disgrace and they have betrayed all the parents who don't have expat or HK Government packages. They should have mounted a legal challenge against the Government's blatant discrimination.
For 170 + years Hong Kong has been successful thanks to a contribution of locals and foreigners, otherwise we would be Shenzen. If Hong Kong is an international city (Cantonese, Mandarin, english and many others) why not make all Hong Kong education international not just priviledged parts of Hong Kong? HK is a unique place that could lead the world. Why are we not discussing this?
For 170 + years Hong Kong has been successful thanks to a contribution of locals and foreigners, otherwise we would be Shenzen. If Hong Kong is an international city (Cantonese, Mandarin, english and many others) why not make all Hong Kong education international not just priviledged parts of Hong Kong? HK is a unique place that could lead the world. Why are we not discussing this?
hong kong has been a success story for most of the last 170 years because of the locals. If foreigners want to come here they need to accept the fact that local english medium education is going to cost what a private sector education in a major city like London or New York is going to cost. If they do not add sufficient value to command that income level from their employers than they are not worth attracting in first place. No more need to discuss.
Johnyuan rightly noted
that "the non-local schools charge so much”
ESF is an extra-educational experience which
in the words of K Ewing,
a teacher of a respectable international school
one of those not feasting on festering colonial privileges
“is like an extended 5-star vacation”
Students everywhere in the world
whether citizens by birth or children of migrant workers
either join local students to follow local syllabus in local schools
or pay commercial tuition to attend private schools
Advocates of continued charity for ESF,
dare you claim being a “local” while flaunting outlandish preferences
and demand subsidized “international” education
in NYC, London, Tokyo, etc., “admirable” cities of “reputable democracies”?
HK’s subsidized public education is generally much better in average quality
than that available in any of those “famous” cities you find intimidating
There is never such divisive perversity as subsidized international school
a unique HK colonial contrive,
for ungrateful beneficiaries in the disguise of benefactors,
an outdated rot to be eliminated the earlier the better
The only colonial privilege is that enjoyed by senior civil servants who send their children abroad at the tax payers expense and thus have no understanding of the problems in local schools (or they understand them too well and thus send their children overseas). As to why ESF charges more than local schools, it simply does not get the same level of subsidy that local schools get. (from the taxpayers)

Overseas education allowance for senior civil servants’ children
is a but not the only lingering colonial privilege
You may be right about that being the cause of past poor education policy
that current and future administrations should try to rectify and improve
It should be interesting to compare
(a) costs and (b) incomes of local and esf schools
(a) in terms of staff pay / benefits, facilities running / maintenance, events and activities
and (b) in terms of tuitions, fees, subsidies, and return on endowment
How is it that HK ended up with the local education system based on rote memory? Clearly, no one thinks highly of this program, including the kids and their parents. Start by examining what the teacher college is teaching the future teachers. Are their curriculum dictated by the Commies from Beijing? If it is, then you have your answer: The continuing digestion of HK by dragging it down to be another Mainland city. If kids in the ESF programs come out better prepared for the top universities in the world and did so without the worthless homework and rote learning, then what is the purpose of putting kids through that hell and have them end up poorly educated? One reason why the Commies do this is actually for crowd control, to tie up the young population so they have less time to congregate and think of protests, but this is HK. What we need is not an ESF or a local system, but one system which is based on active learning with intent to put out tri-lingual graduates prepared for integration into the actual society, comparable to the tracks which the ESF schools target. HK is setting itself up for a caste system where the kids from poorer families don't have a chance for a good career. Primary education of a society should not be based on parental income. It is not like HK is short of money. Spend it on better education for everyone instead of these stupid giveaways to forestall unrest. What is 6000 HKD good for? Dimsum?
Don't think it has anything to do with the commies. It's a cultural way of learning. Chinese have been rote learning for hundreds of years. I think this culture started with the intellectual mandarins that used to rule china hundreds of years ago. To get ahead in life, becoming a mandarin would have been very prestigious in those days. May civilians tried for these exams which involved a knowing a lot of stuff. Yes, the government should be teaching 3 languages in local schools, unfortunately, they are not. The level of English and mandarin is actually very poor among the new generation, and it is sad, that only the rich can provide the opportunity for their kids to advance in life. The rich get richer, it feels like we are turning back the clock.
Local schools certainly have problems, but these were already entrenched long before the "commies" arrived.
Local schools certainly have problems, but these were already entrenched long before the "commies" arrived.
Well said.
" concern that a lack of school places could hit the city's competitiveness by deterring talented international professionals from moving to the city." This argument is FAULTY. I don't see New York or London offer Chinese, French, Polish or other language medium schools. Are they saying the Chinese, French, or Polish have no talent? Hong Kong's competitiveness is hurt not by lacking school places, but by the high rents for office spaces and affordable housing.
After reading a many faceted report on ESF, International Schools and local schools telling the state of education in Hong Kong, here are few questions:
1. Why the non-local schools charges so much? Is it because of expansive teaching staffs that are exceptionally better trained even by international standard? If so where they come from? Are schools paying a lot of debt services due to construction of the school premises and the land the schools sit on? Or the rates are actually set by whatever the market can bear?
2. Why the local schools so much cheaper? Is it because teaching staffs are cheaper and less talented? Is this why local schools can’t give up assigning abundant homework and employing rote learning as means to substitute real teaching for real learning? But isn’t there a local teaching university which can make some changes of schools in Hong Kong? Or is it because Hong Kong has a shortage of teachers for a long time – many those qualified including university graduates prefer to be stock broker or property broker?
3. Is the government since the hangover continued to be unmoved by the major bipolar educational choice – international and local for the citizens? Is this really quite a wired way to tell the world that Hong Kong is an international city? Is this a Hong Kong characteristic – nothing can be done to control the runaway cost of foreign schools and stagnation of local schools?
Thank you.
International teachers are paid around 4x more than local, because the demand for this rare expertise far exceeds supply. International teachers speak native English that's why, as well as knowing how to teach in a western style. The other major cost is the building cost. Local schools operate in or near government buildings. I suspect they pay next to nothing for the premise. My kid goes to both a local and international kindie. I pay nothing for the local kindie, but the quality of staff is just as high and they appear to have more resources! Good books, toys, outdoor playground, they even have a ballet studio!
let's find a solution? according to World Bank (2010), HKG govt. spent about US$6,000 (HK$47,000) per student per year on public education. HKG should spend the same per capita $ to subsidize ESF students. as to no subsidy no foreign talent argument. if employers truly need the "talent", they will pay up. it's all in the pricing.
The reality is that a lot, maybe a half of the places in esf schools are filled with local Hong Kong kids. Talking to these parents, they tell me they send their kids there because they prefer the broader, less pressured environment. They simply want their kids to be happy. The bigger issue, I think, is not the only scarcity of places for middle executive expats, but is the inefficient model of the current local system. Don't get me wrong, I considered sending my kids throughout the local system, but with 1-3 hours of homework every night, just in primary school, to memorise a lot of "stuff", which has little value in adult life (I say this, because I have been through that) really kills a kid's passion for learning and robs them of their childhood. The local model/curriculum needs to be changed. It appears to me that a lot of Hong Kong people do recognise this, but what is being done? The politicians of Hong Kong can make the difference, but they do not. They are tied to their old beliefs and "patriotism". Hong Kong people are the most forward-looking people in the world, unfortunately, Hong Kong is not run by these smart people. The government unfortunately are still living the memories of the colonial past, where they felt sideline and they feel they need to put their stamp on. However, the world changes and Hong Kong is an international centre today. local hong kong people think intenrationally. It is sad that the new generation of children will be deprived this opportuni
many "international" cities all over the world have expat schools for expat kids where english is the teaching medium, i am not aware any govt. subsidies to these schools. however, there are expat schools subsidized by the corporations which choose to bring in foreign "talents". hong kong should learn from these countries.
I have lived here and paid taxes for 22 years, and therefore in a small way contributed to the ESF subvention. I had expected to be able to send my children to ESF and for school fees to be partially paid for by the subvention. However, it looks like I will be on the losing end of this deal.
We should all be asking our legislators why the government is not willing to spend the small sum of HK$283m per year to help thousands of children here, and at the same time continues to spend in excess of HK$300m to send a handful of senior civil servants children to study in the UK. What's so bad with HK schools??? All senior civil servants should be required to send their kids to local schools here.
There needs to be a serious rethink here on how we fund education. One idea would be for all entitled students to be given a voucher that they can take with them to any school. As a starting point for primary students the voucher could be worth HK$50k per year and for secondary HK$75k. And entitled student is one born here or born to parents with PR status. Both of these demonstrate commitment to Hong Kong.
All children born in Hong Kong or whose tax paying parents have permanent ID cards should get the same monthly subsidy,no matter where they are educated here or what race they are.
ESF, supposedly a not-for-profit system is affordable compared to other for-profit international schools but fees go beyond education cost; CAS week to Fiji $18,000, mandatory laptop computer $6,000, PTA, school bus $15000/year, uniforms, book deposits, scientific calculator $1300 etc etc. In year 11 IGCSE exam time the last month's fees are charged even through the child is not attending school. Allow $120,000 per year per student in middle school, more in year 12/13 then 15% IRD tax on that. Fees for 3-child families really get your attention even before rampant landlords & supermarkets kick in.
The arrogant Govt slap in the face for all Intl school parents is, no tax allowance for school fees; they charge IRD tax on all school fees paid.
When you have supposedly accountable officials earning 30% more than Obama you would expect better than what is on offer, rather we have blinkered incompetence & tunnel vision devoted to flawed backroom policies from vastly overpaid individuals with chips on their shoulders. It is time they realized children are not pawns & all should be treated equally and equitably. Govt servants employed before 1 June 2000 get local education allowance, 75% of ESF school fees, meanwhile Govt hands $100m to 'support' each District Council to play with concrete.


SCMP.com Account