Recycled cotton the fashion world’s antidote to environmental concerns
Swedish fast-fashion retailer H&M offers HK$9 million annual prize for new techniques to recycle clothes; currently, recycled cotton content of an item of clothing cannot exceed 20 per cent
Hennes & Mauritz, the world’s second-biggest fashion retailer, is launching a fresh effort to promote recycling as it seeks to cut its environmental impact, boost its ethical credentials and address looming shortages of raw materials.
The move comes as critics point out the damage being caused by a throwaway culture fuelled by cheap clothing that has seen a sharp rise in the number of garments sold annually around the world.
Sweden’s H&M, which is launching a line of jeans containing recycled cotton next week, will offer an annual €1 million (HK$9 million) prize for new techniques to recycle clothes, according to chief executive Karl-Johan Persson.
“No company, fast-fashion or not, can continue exactly like today,” Persson says. “The prize’s largest potential lies with finding new technology that means we can recycle the fibres with unchanged quality.”
As population pressure mounts, retailers such as H&M are concerned about potential future shortages of cotton, which is heavily water and pesticide dependent.
Existing cotton recycling methods make poor-quality fibres, and there is no efficient way to recycle garments of mixed materials, so the vast majority of clothes end up in landfill.
Johan Rockstrom, environmental science professor at Stockholm University and a jury member for the H&M prize, said the fashion industry needs to find new business models to respond to global resource shortages.
“This is a great challenge for H&M whose trademark is cheap clothes at good quality … The fact it’s cheap means there’s a risk people buy and throw away, or buy too much,” he says.
Bernstein analyst Anne-Charlotte Windal said the industry’s sustainability drive reflected the dilemma facing fast-fashion companies that constantly churn out new styles.
“The model only works if they encourage very frequent purchases, but the consumers are aware of the increasing effect it has on the environment,” she says.
Other companies are coming up with their own solutions.
Mud Jeans is a Dutch company that leases its garments to consumers and then offers them a replacement each year, repairing and reselling the used ones or recycling the fabric.
“This is the future: producers that are responsible for their own waste,” says chief executive Bert van Son.
“Our company can do this because we are quite small: that it is why we can do these kinds of crazy things because we can keep cotton pure. If you are a big store chain it is very complicated if you mix cotton and polyester.”
H&M joined forces earlier this year with Puma-owner Kering to support start-up Worn Again, which is developing a technology for separating and extracting fibres in mixed-material garments.
Meanwhile, a company called Re:newcell is developing a method to improve the quality of recycled cotton fibres and hopes to build a first factory in coming years.
Only about a maximum of 20 per cent of recycled cotton can be used in a new pair of jeans because the fibre length is shortened in the shredding process, impacting quality, H&M says.
H&M and Kering are not alone in beating the recycling drum. Like H&M, Britain’s Marks & Spencer and Italy’s Calzedonia collects used items in their stores for recycling.
On a much smaller scale, Finnish entrepreneurs Pure Waste Textiles have managed to produce sweat shirts from 100 per cent recycled cotton after improving existing recycling techniques and by recycling off-cuts from clothes factories.
However, others believe that recycling is just a distraction from the real challenge of the fashion industry: persuading customers to keep wearing their clothes for longer.
To that end, British designer Tom Cridland is offering a 30-year guarantee on a range of T-shirts. “I don’t believe it is fair on customers to churn out plain white T-shirts that will only last a year or two,” he says. “I can’t compete on price so I have to do something different.”