Mettle fatigue
Mainland audiences will see a tailor-made version of the latest Iron Man instalment. But will it be a clanger, asks Richard James Havis

are no fun. The ancient Greeks, who set the model for Western drama, knew that. Their heroes always come with a fatal flaw, be it psychological or physical. The warrior Achilles is a case in point.
Through the ages, humans have preferred to follow the plight of heroes with a vulnerable side - because that makes them more like us.
It's a moot point whether American heroes such as DC Comics' Superman and Marvel Comics' Spider-Man are the myths of the modern age, although the fanatical devotion of their fans suggests they are more important to their readers than mere pastimes. DC and Marvel, the two major US comic companies, have always offered different versions of heroism. In the 1960s and '70s, DC heroes were generally superhuman, one-dimensional characters, while Marvel's were troubled creatures who pushed their physical limits to a masochistic degree. Marvel's Spider-Man, in "real" life the lovelorn adolescent Peter Parker, is the best known of these.

Iron Man has, of course, been the star of two hit Hollywood movies, both directed by Jon Favreau. The latest instalment, Iron Man 3, opens in Hong Kong on April 25.
The first Iron Man film won critical acclaim for its portrayal of a superhero with a human side, rather than a vengeful killing machine. Its credibility was helped by the fact that the star, Robert Downey Jnr, had some well-publicised drink and drug troubles in the late '90s.