• Fri
  • Dec 26, 2014
  • Updated: 11:01pm
NewsAsia
TERRITORIAL DISPUTE

Manila UN case means China may quit maritime pact

Security expert warns Beijing could withdraw from maritime treaty rather than be bound by its rulings on South China Sea disputes

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 11 December, 2013, 9:48pm
UPDATED : Thursday, 12 December, 2013, 12:33am
 

A prominent Chinese academic says Beijing could withdraw from the UN's maritime treaty rather than submit to judgment on its disputed sovereignty claims in the South China Sea.

Regional security expert Professor Shen Dingli said the decision by the Philippines to refer its territorial disputes with China to UN arbitration demonstrated that it was "a mistake" for China to have joined the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos) in the first place.

The more you sue China, the more China would [want to] quit the treaty
PROFESSOR SHEN DINGLI

Shen, deputy dean of Fudan University's Institute of International Studies, was speaking on the sidelines of a forum last week in Manila, entitled "What is to be Done? Resolving Maritime Disputes in Southeast Asia".

He said that "how to make China not quit the treaty is in [the Philippines'] interests".

Giving what he said was a personal opinion, Shen said the Philippines had blundered by going to the UN International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea to seek judgment on the validity of China's "nine-dash line", through which it claims most of the South China Sea.

That claim is disputed by the Philippines, among other nations, and Manila filed the UN action in January.

"The more you sue China, the more China would [want to] quit the treaty. [In that event, China] would never abide by the treaty, and [the Philippines would] have no international base for China to observe any more," Shen said.

He said there were four ways available to settle the dispute: war, the UN tribunal, bilateral negotiations, and mediation by a third country.

He said he advocated what he said was a win-win solution.

"[China could say to the Philippines] 'I am willing to cut my sovereignty … your island is ours but we still want to fish [there] … You allow us to fish, we allow you to take what you have taken."

Manila's action before the UN tribunal was a hot topic at the conference hosted by the Angara Centre, a private think tank created by former Philippine senator Edgardo Angara.

Dr Ian Storey, a senior fellow at Singapore's Institute for Southeast Asian Studies, said "China is furious" at Manila over the case.

He said China's attitude to the situation was "how dare the Philippines have the temerity to take us to court without consulting us. How dare you. We will punish you for that."

He said that China had tried to humiliate and isolate Philippine President Benigno Aquino by effectively withdrawing an invitation to a China-Asean trade fair in Nanning in September by saying "Oh, by the way you can only come if you withdraw your suit".

Storey suggested that Asean and China should strike an "incidents at sea agreement" similar to that established between Russia, Japan, South Korea and Western countries in the 1980s.

He said Manila should be prepared for the possibility that the UN tribunal would decide not to issue a ruling because it might damage Unclos.

He said the tribunal was likely to have dealt with the suit by 2016, the year Aquino steps down.

Philippine Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio, a guest at the forum, said it would be "horrible and a tectonic disaster" should a new president drop the case against China.

"That means … admitting that our position is weak," said Carpio, who wrote the Supreme Court ruling that Philippine territorial claims in the South China Sea were constitutional.

Carpio, who was a presidential official when China seized Mischief Reef in the mid-1990s, rejected Beijing's assertions that Manila had refused to negotiate.

"We have been trying to talk to them for the past 15 years. When they occupied Mischief Reef 15 years ago, we asked them 'Let's sit down and negotiate'. They said - 'No, it's ours'."

A separate symposium by the Philippine Association for Chinese Studies was also held last week on the same topic.

Dr Wu Shicun, president of China's National Institute for South China Sea Studies, suggested that Beijing and Manila could thaw relations by co-operating in "low-sensitivity fields" such as disaster relief.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
7

This article is now closed to comments

caractacus
"Professor Shen Dingli said: "that it was "a mistake" for China to have joined the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos) in the first place."....." The more you sue China, the more China would [want to] quit the treaty. [In that event, China] would never abide by the treaty, and [the Philippines would] have no international base for China to observe any more,"
This demonstrates the mentality behind Professor Shen Dingli's statements and proves that China regards itself above any civilised code of law.
This is typical of China's arrogant attitude: "it was a mistake so we no longer agree". This shows its contempt for the rule of law and international agreements going back into its earliest contacts with other nations. When it no longer suits it, China just lies and says the treaty does not bind it.
China DID sign the treaty and this demonstrates how insincere China is when a treaty one day suddenly doesn't suit its fickle mood. It has NEVER abided by any treaty which doesn't suit its selfish ends.
Fine, let China leave the treaty. Let it dig its own hole and let the whole world see this nation, which trumpets its own so called civilisation, for what it really is, a barbarous dictatorship with no respect for international law, decency, fairness or honesty.
HK-Lover
There is a saying in the business community doing business with China - the real negotiations start after the contract has been signed. That is because people in China have little regard for contracts, particularly when clauses are not in the Chinese side's favour.
China accepts a court ruling only if the authorities had a say in the judges "ruling". That's how the rule of law is practiced in China - whether we like it or not.
chanaa
Doesnt make it right, but how diff is that from US & Israel who consistently make a mockery of UN engagement rules ?
Your last para perfectly describes the US
HiggsSinglet
behave just like usa and israel
HiggsSinglet
china is following the steps of usa!! You are either with me or you are not!!! Do it my way or else!!!
alpot_scmp
The difference is that USA and Israel are democratic countries. Their actions are swayed by the majority. China is a totalitarian country who does not care what the majority thinks.
dodgiereigh
...

Login

SCMP.com Account

or