• Thu
  • Dec 18, 2014
  • Updated: 5:55am

Neville Maxwell discloses document revealing that India provoked China into 1962 border war

Journalist's Snowden-like revelations about 1962 war boost China's claims of 'peaceful rise'

PUBLISHED : Monday, 31 March, 2014, 5:31am
UPDATED : Monday, 31 March, 2014, 12:00pm

At an official banquet in Beijing in 1971, Neville Maxwell had the shock of his life. Premier Zhou Enlai and Pakistan's then prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto rose from the head table and walked to the foreign correspondents' table, where The Times reporter was seated.

"Mr Maxwell," said Zhou through his interpreter, "your book has done a service to truth, and China has benefited from that." Zhou called for a glass of mao-tai and offered him a toast.

"That moment at the banquet is deeply engraved in my memory, failing as it sometimes is," Maxwell said in an interview with the South China Morning Post.

The 87-year-old Australian journalist and historian likes to make jokes about his supposedly fading memory. But he won't let India forget its past errors which, he says, led to the 1962 Sino-Indian war.

Beijing would welcome the revived attention to their India dispute
Journalist Neville Maxwell

For nearly half a century he has been going against the grain of Indian collective memory that remembers the humiliating defeat in the month-long border war as an unprovoked act of aggression by a country it considered a friend.

This month he pulled a Snowden on India. He exposed a top-secret Indian war report that returned the spotlight to a period in history that still sours public opinion in India and bars normal ties between the two Asian giants.

In a specially created blog, Maxwell published a chunk of the secret war report that harshly criticised the highest echelons of power in India at the time for pursuing a flawed strategy of provoking China without the means to handle a backlash.

India's toll in that short war in the high Himalayas was 1,383 killed, 1,047 wounded and 1,696 missing. China never declared its losses. The war ended when Beijing suddenly called a unilateral ceasefire and ordered its troops to retreat to their previous positions - all after dealing India its worst military drubbing.

India called the "attack" a stab in the back. But China maintained it was a necessary counterattack to fend off India's advances on its territory - Maxwell's thoughts exactly. "I had been trying for years to get the report on to the public record but it had begun to look as if the report might never be published, and I thought that would be dreadful," Maxwell told the Post in an exclusive interview. Speaking from Sydney, it was the first time he discussed his disclosure that has made waves in India.

Maxwell covered the 1962 war as The Times' India correspondent. Like all Western journalists, he unquestioningly accepted India's line that China had been the aggressor and reported it as such. Later, when he took a sabbatical to study the conflict more deeply, he said he began to see China's side of the story.

"I was blinded by ideology … liberal anti-communism. You'll see the same affecting many journalists today, as American policy continues the cold war," he said.

In 1970, a converted Maxwell published an influential yet controversial revisionist tome, India's China War - the object of Zhou's praise at the banquet the following year. The book chronicled how India provoked Beijing into the fight, challenging the narrative of Chinese aggression. For his conviction, Indians denounced Maxwell as a China apologist and an India-basher.

The inspiration for Maxwell's epiphany was widely believed to be a document that gave him a rare insight into the workings of the then Indian establishment. The so-called Henderson Brooks-Bhagat Report was an operational review of India's military debacle commissioned by New Delhi that Maxwell managed to obtain.

Compiled by Lieutenant-General Henderson Brooks and Brigadier Premindra Singh Bhagat in 1963, it has been kept secret by the Indian government despite repeated appeals that it be declassified. The government's excuse for keeping the report under wraps "for national security" has few takers in India. The predominant view is that the government aims to protect the legacy of the then prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru.

Disgraced by the 1962 defeat, Nehru died a broken man within two years. But the Nehru-Gandhi clan, through its grip on the ruling Congress Party, has continued to maintain a near monopoly on the levers of power.

The report is a dry army operations review, its terms of reference narrowed to military preparedness to insulate the civilian leadership from a witch hunt. But the authors still manage to make a scathing implicit attack on top civilian and military authorities.

In particular, they rip into the so-called "forward policy" pushed by the Nehru government, under which Indian troops were told to advance from their existing positions to stake out new territory and force out the Chinese.

The report details how this brinkmanship was forced down the throats of ground commanders despite their repeated warnings about reversing the border's status quo without sufficient preparation. Such moves, they said, were bound to provoke the Chinese.

Half a century on, as India and China struggle to overcome the mutual suspicion left over from the war, peaceniks hope Maxwell's outing of the secret war report might lead to more critical examination within India about its own role in the war and help reset bilateral relations.

Indian media organisations have been widely covering the report, long seen as the key to bringing closure to a national shame. Opposition parties have renewed demands for the report to be declassified, but the government has refused to budge. In a moving piece thanking Maxwell, Indian Express editor Shekhar Gupta wrote that the report was still being treated as top secret only to "protect our carefully crafted and preserved mythologies of 1962".

For China, the significance of the disclosure goes beyond India. At a time when there is growing disquiet in the region over China's claim to a "peaceful rise", a revisiting of the 1962 war helps it polish its credentials while reaffirming its ideological steel in view of its disputes in the South China and East China Seas.

"Beijing would welcome the revived attention to their India dispute," Maxwell said. "Its lessons are that China is conflict-averse and will do all it can to reach peaceful solutions, but that it can't be pushed around and will never back away from defending what it sees as its basic security concerns. If the issue becomes fight or surrender, the PRC will always fight."


Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

A Matsui
India started the 1962 border war because the Indian government was instigated by the CIA and the British. The Indians also looked down on China and love believing in their own misguided superiority. Just like the Japanese in 1941 started a war with the US by bombing Pearl Harbour. Both, India and Japan started a war with an adversary by stealth but ended up losing badly. Both blame their victims for losing, something quite laughable. Nehru tried to stab India's friend China in the back and ended up stabbing India and himself. Unfortunately the Indian government and media to this day is still lying about the actual causes of the unnecessary 1962 war which India started and ingloriously lost, for which the blame lies squarely with India. India should grow up and not lie to herself and stab her friends in the back. India should not be like Japan, shameless, mad and dishonourable.
How About
In these days of CNN and real-time broadcasts, the public are still duped everytime about who the beneficiaries of any war are, so you can imagine what propaganda can be spun in a war that far back in time in the Himalayas. The Brits and the Yankees are wanted the death knell on the Reds since WW2 because it was Stalin and Communism which defeated the Nazis and the Third Reich, a movement that was conceived by german democracy and the USA has done their utmost to emulate, everything down to the the eagle insignia for the POTUS.
This is a balanced editorial choice of SCMP to which the whole team deserves praise, keep up the good work!
The Indian government should apologise to China for lying about the 1962 war which India started and lost, it should also apologise to the Indian people for misleading them for 52 years about the 1962 war. The Indian government blaming China for a war it started and lost and then lying about it to the Indian people is really dishonourable.
India is a very hegemonic country. It annexed Goa, it annexed Sikkim, it annexed South Tibet, it made Bhutan a protectorate, it started several wars with Pakistan. It threatened to retaliate against Fiji for ethnic violence against Indians & nearly intervened in Madagascar. It sent troops into Sri Lanka but was disastrously defeated by the Tamil Tigers. And as Maxwell says, it provoked a war with China. In addition, it was understood at that time that India should exercise control over or make Tibet a protectorate as it was also a British ambition which the Indians felt bequeathed to it. Moreover, if you ask their neighbours like Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, 99% would liken India to a regional hegemon rather than a benevolent big brother. So yes, we should all be wary of a rising India.
So all the while India is the aggressor in the 1962 war with China while pretending to be the victim. What hypocrisy! The 200 years of British colonialism have turned India into a nation of liars, rapists, robbers and scums just like the British sahibs that the Indians try to emulate but lacks the class and finesse to imitate well. Indians have learned all the bad things from the British especially lying and murdering.
There are lots of lies when it comes to wars, and the media is often commandeered to steer the populace one way or another.
This is like the Six-Day war, where most of the West assumed that the Arabs are the aggressors, even though Israel is the one who fired the first shot (and nearly sink an ally's reconnaissance ship to maintain the myth).
People should try and see things with a critical eye, beyond their own ideology.


SCMP.com Account