Refugees to be hardest hit by Australia’s tougher new citizenship test, rights group says
Announcing the changes, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said speaking English was a key element of successfully integrating into Australia
Refugees would be hit hardest by changes to Australia’s citizenship test, the refugee council says, with people deterred from applying for citizenship or potentially failing the test under new English language requirements.
The Refugee Council of Australia argues older refugees, and those who’ve arrived from conflict zones with disrupted educations, would find the strengthened English requirement hardest.
“While the overwhelming majority of refugee and humanitarian entrants are children and young people who typically learn English quickly, those brought to Australia as refugees include some older adults, torture survivors and people with disabilities who struggle to master English. These are the people who are most likely to miss out on citizenship under the changes being planned by the government,” the RCOA chief executive, Paul Power, said.
“The sad irony is that people who have come to Australia as refugees value the freedom and security associated with Australian citizenship more highly than any other group in the nation.”
Power said the proposed changes to the citizenship test would not achieve what the government has said it is aiming to do.
“No extremist or terrorist is going to be unearthed by a few questions about values. But the person who will struggle will be the 45-year-old Sudanese mother, who has come to Australia as a refugee, who has had a disrupted, if any, formal education, and is struggling in adulthood to learn a fourth language.”
Department of Immigration and Border Protection statistics reveal refugees apply for citizenship at a higher rate than any other migrant group. But they also fail the test at a far higher rate – refugees have a failure rate of about 8.8 per cent , six times the rate of 1.4 per cent for other categories of migrants. On average, a refugee needs to attempt the citizenship test 2.4 times, double the average for all migrants of 1.2 times.
Announcing the changes, the prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, said speaking English was a key element of successfully integrating into Australia.
“I reckon if we went out today and said to Australians ‘Do you think you could become an Australian citizen without being able to speak English?’ They’d say ‘You’re kidding. Surely you’d have to be able to speak [English]’, most people would be surprised that this has not been the law for years and it’s fundamental.”
Citizenship already has a “basic” English test requirement, that will be strengthened to a “competent” level assessed by an independent, accredited organisation.
Henry Sherrell, researcher at the ANU’s Crawford School of Public Policy, said the proposed new English language requirement would be a serious barrier to citizenship, particularly for refugees and people in Australia on family visas or the spouses of skilled migrants.
He said the proposed new English level, the equivalent English proficiency of some university entrance requirements, was too high.
“Migrants want to learn English. They want to work. However, not every single newcomer to Australia is in the position to achieve this level of English. This represents a fundamental change to citizenship in Australia with enormous consequences.”
In 2008, one of Australia’s most senior diplomats, Richard Woolcott, reviewed the citizenship test, which had only been introduced the year before. He found it was “flawed, intimidating to some, and discriminatory” and needed significant reform.
“Alternative and improved education pathways to acquire citizenship need to be established for different categories of people seeking citizenship.
“The special situations of refugee and humanitarian entrants and other disadvantaged and vulnerable people seeking citizenship must be addressed.”
The test underwent minor changes in 2009. The citizenship test currently has exemptions for people aged over 60 or with significant disabilities. A government discussion paper on the proposed citizenship test changes, released on Thursday, mentions these exemptions and indicates that they will continue.
Refugees already in the country face substantial – in some cases illegal – barriers to becoming citizens.
More than 10,000 potential citizens who have completed all the requirements for citizenship, including passing the test, and are awaiting only a ceremony to confer citizenship.
In December last year, the federal court ruled the government had acted illegally in putting valid citizenship applications from refugees who’d arrived in the country by boat “in a drawer” – either physical or metaphorical called the “undocumented arrivals drawer” – and refusing to process them.
The government revealed in court there were 10,231 people who had qualified for citizenship who were living in limbo unsure, when, if ever they would be granted citizenship. Some had been invited to ceremonies only to be told by text message the night before that they would not be made citizens.
Justice Mordecai Bromberg ordered the department to reprocess the applications of the two refugees brought as test cases before the court, and the department is evaluating the others still waiting on a citizenship ceremony.