Cambodian court dismisses crimes against humanity case against mid-level Khmer Rouge cadre
Khmer Rouge leader Pol Pot died in 1998 without ever facing justice and the vast majority of regime cadres responsible for one the 20th century’s worst genocides remain free
A UN-backed court on Wednesday dismissed a case against a former Khmer Rouge cadre charged with crimes against humanity, highlighting the difficulties of bringing lower level members of the brutal regime to justice.
The Khmer Rouge dismantled modern society in Cambodia in their quest for an agrarian Marxist utopia, killing up to two million people. Only a handful of senior leaders have been jailed by the special court set up to deliver justice to the regime’s victims.
But a string of recent cases had raised hopes of new convictions in a country where thousands of regime officials have never paid for their crimes.
Mid-ranking cadre Im Chaem, a former district official, was among four Khmer Rouge members facing prosecution for charges including genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
Prosecutors and survivors accused her of being a key player in overseeing regime policies that led to the deaths of tens of thousands.
But on Wednesday two judges – a Cambodian and a German national – threw out the prosecution against her, ruling the court did not have the remit to pursue lower level cadres.
“Im Chaem is not subject to the [tribunal’s] personal jurisdiction, which means she was neither a senior leader nor otherwise one of the most responsible officials of the Khmer Rouge regime,” the court said in a statement. The decision illustrates both the limits of the court’s powers as well as the Cambodian government’s public unease over pursuing fresh trials.
Strongman Prime Minister Hun Sen – himself a former Khmer Rouge cadre before he defected – has repeatedly hit out at the prospect of further prosecutions, warning they could ignite civil unrest.
Critics say Hun Sen is worried new cases might shine an uncomfortable spotlight on historical links between government members and the brutal communist regime.
Youk Chhang, director of the Documentation Centre of Cambodia, which researches the Khmer Rouge atrocities, said he was dismayed by the decision.
“It is difficult to swallow but we must accept the decision with the understanding that the judges have followed the rules and the evidence,” he said. “In reality, it shouldn’t just be those who commit crimes against millions of people who should be charged as a responsible person,” he added, saying lower level members responsible for fewer deaths should still be in the dock.
But some survivors welcomed the decision, weary that new trials would hinder the country’s ability to move on. “I don’t want this Khmer Rouge trial to go too far. Otherwise, we need to prosecute all Khmer Rouge members,” Chum Mey, one of a handful survivors from Khmer Rouge’s notorious Tuol Sleng prison, said.
Prosecutors and civil parties are allowed to appeal against the decision.
Khmer Rouge leader Pol Pot died in 1998 without ever facing justice and the vast majority of regime cadres responsible for one the 20th century’s worst genocides remain free. But the court has seen some success.
“Brother Number Two” Nuon Chea, 90, and ex-head of state Khieu Samphan, 85, were the first top leaders to be sentenced to life in jail for crime against humanity from a regime responsible for the deaths of up to two million Cambodians from 1975-79. The pair are also currently undergoing a second trial for genocide of ethnic Vietnamese and Muslim minorities, forced marriage and rape.