• Sun
  • Dec 21, 2014
  • Updated: 7:16pm
Column
PUBLISHED : Monday, 22 October, 2012, 12:00am
UPDATED : Wednesday, 24 October, 2012, 7:14am

The solution to Beijing's problems: move the capital to Hebei

Congestion and pollution are making Beijing unlivable. The best answer would be to shift the whole seat of government 100km away

BIO

Wang Xiangwei took up the role of Editor-in-Chief in February 2012, responsible for the editorial direction and newsroom operations. He started his 20-year career at the China Daily, before moving to the UK, where he gained valuable experience at a number of news organisations, including the BBC Chinese Service. In 1993, he moved to Hong Kong and worked at the Eastern Express before joining the South China Morning Post in 1996 as our China Business Reporter. He was subsequently promoted to China Editor in 2000 and Deputy Editor in 2007, a position he held for four years prior to being promoted to his current position. Mr. Wang has a Masters degree in Journalism, and a Bachelors degree in English.
 

Early next month, the ruling Communist Party is scheduled to elect a new generation of leaders to head the country for the next 10 years. As the incoming leaders ponder the future of the country they should also spare some thoughts for the future of the capital where they live.

First-time visitors to Beijing are likely to be impressed by the combination of majestic historic sites like the Forbidden City and gleaming modern glass structures like the National Theatre. But for its nearly 20 million long-suffering residents, Beijing is fast becoming notorious as one of the mainland's most unlivable cities.

Beijing has long prided itself as the country's political, cultural, and economic capital. But because of this it has also developed the fully fledged megacity syndrome seen in some other poor countries, including dense population, soaring property prices, traffic jams and environmental pollution.

The traffic congestion has reached unbearable levels in a city with more than 5 million vehicles and growing. On many days there are no "rush hours", because the jams last all day long. The municipal government has introduced tough measures to limit the number of cars on the road, with the sale of new cars restricted through a lottery, while it has spent tens of billions of yuan to build subways and other public transport.

The effect on congestion has been minimal, however.

Meanwhile, many more flock to the city each year, seeking jobs and stretching the city's already thin services in medical care, education and housing. Soaring prices have made owning a home beyond the reach of the young and the poor, forcing the city to impose tight controls over the type of residents who can buy a flat and the number of flats they can buy.

There is a thick irony in Beijing's aspiration to be a world-class city when its residents cannot buy a car or flat freely.

Pollution, much of it exhaust fumes from vehicles, has become a serious health hazard, with a yellowish haze appearing to hang over the city all year long.

More ominously, the city, located on the northern tip of the north China plain, has often suffered from drought and is to face more severe water shortages in the years to come. According to official data, the city's per capita water resources have declined to 100 cubic metres, far lower than the internationally accepted standard of 1,000 cubic metres. This is one of the main reasons that the central government has decided to invest tens of billions of yuan in the south-to-north water diversion scheme. However, environmentalists have long opposed the project, not only for its inefficiencies but also over whether the water would be drinkable by the time it eventually reaches Beijing.

Theoretically, the relocation of the capital to the southern part of the country is the best option. This is too daunting a task to be considered quickly, for both political and strategic reasons. However, the leadership can learn lessons from the South Koreans. In July, South Korea inaugurated Sejong City, 120 kilometres south of Seoul. By 2015, Sejong City will house several dozen central government offices and ministries currently located in or near the capital. Political wrangling means the South Korean government has decided to keep 10 or so state bodies, including the president's office, the foreign ministry, the defence ministry and parliament, in Seoul, leading to claims by critics that the split government will lead to wasted travelling time and inefficiency.

The lesson for the mainland leadership should be to move the entire central government apparatus to a city in Hebei province, within 100 to 150 kilometres of Beijing. The benefits would be many. A high-speed train and a highway could make the travelling time between Beijing and the new capital city manageable. It would not only greatly ease the problems Beijing is facing but also significantly boost economic development in Hebei.

Almost all central government ministries and agencies occupy prime land in central Beijing. Relocation would free up vast plots of land for residential development. Since the founding of the People's Republic, the leadership has been headquartered in the vast Zhongnanhai compound, covering 100 hectares, formerly royal playgrounds in the Ming and Qing dynasties. After relocation, the compound could be added to the adjacent Beihai park, which is already open to the public.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

8

This article is now closed to comments

johnyuan
Lacking roads for Beijing is the root of its traffic and related problems.They will still remain even after the move.
scmpbeijing1
What a silly article. I suggest moving Zhongnanhai 100 miles to the East. That will take care of all the problems in China.
shouken
Agitated officialdom candidates in Beijing (Qing dynasty) proposed to the court about relocating the government seat to Xi'an, in preparation for an all-out war with Japan after China's shameful defeat of 1895. The idea then was a relocation deeper into China would make the central government less vulnerable to attacks by foreign aggressors. Maybe it is time to consider relocating the capital, for primarily technical reasons.
rsgould
Enforcing environmental regulations would do wonders for the environment.
VicSexton
Wouldn't moving the capital be an admission of failure & therefore a big loss of face in Chinese culture? Interesting idea though.
shouken
"Wouldn't moving the capital be an admission of failure & therefore a big loss of face in Chinese culture?"
Why would it be? This post betrays serious ignorance of China's history and culture. Ming Dynasty moved its capital from Nanjing to Beijing end of 14th century. What does this have to do with losing face or admission of failure? Chinese people do not and do not know how to admit failures? This question must come from an non-Chinese born and raised outside of China.
deerlai
Yes! It is sensible and logical.
Similarly, HK Govt should consider moving all central government departments from Tamar to New Territories - to ease traffic jam in Central and X-harbour tunnels, to release more office space in Central for financial and commercial sectors, to develop one more commercial centre in New Territories where more populations could then be housed with job opportunities, to create more job opportunities in New Territories where jobs are mostly needed and to build more shopping areas to accommodate visitors from Mainland. To solve the transportation problem, HK Govt could build a high speed underground rail running directly from the new centre to Central - the traveling time could be within 15 minutes. The rail could be subsidised by land sales in the new centre.
likingming
Are you talking about the development of North-East New Territories ?
Should Beijing learn from HK instead and be more xenophobia and forbid non-Beijingers from getting into Beijing ?
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or