Diaoyu Islands

The Diaoyu Islands are a group of uninhabited islands located roughly due east of mainland China, northeast of Taiwan, west of Okinawa Island, and north of the southwestern end of the Ryukyu Islands. They are currently controlled by Japan, which calls them Senkaku Islands. Both China and Taiwan claim sovereignty over the islands. 

NewsChina
TERRITORIAL DISPUTES

Japan to give patrol boats to Manila amid China tensions

Monday, 11 February, 2013, 11:05am

Japan plans to donate patrol boats costing US$11 million each to the Philippines, ramping up regional efforts to monitor China’s maritime activity in disputed waters, a newspaper said on Monday.

The Japanese government plans to finance the deal in its fiscal this year budget starting in April and hopes to officially sign it early next year, the Nikkei business daily reported.

Japan will then provide the Philippines with the newly built patrol vessels, which will cost more than 1 billion yen each, the newspaper said, without specifying the number of boats on offer.

Both countries are locked in separate territorial disputes with China.

Japan’s dispute is over a group of uninhabited islands in the East China Sea known as the Senkakus in Japan and the Diaoyus in China.

The Philippines is one of several Southeast Asian countries, including Vietnam, that are in rows with China over claims to parts of the South China Sea. Two of the hotspots are the Spratly Islands and Scarborough Shoal.

The Japanese coastguard also plans to train Philippine and Vietnamese personnel as part of additional efforts to boost security co-operation with Southeast Asia, the Nikkei said.

In the fiscal 2013 budget draft, 2.5 billion yen has been allotted for such expenditure, it said.

Last month, Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida visited Manila and called for stronger ties with the Philippines to help ensure regional peace.

Japan’s coastguard last month said it would create a special unit comprising 10 new large patrol boats to boost its surveillance of the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands.

The long-running row over the islands intensified in September when Tokyo nationalised part of the chain, triggering fury in Beijing and huge anti-Japan demonstrations across China.

In the most serious high-seas incident yet, Japan last week said that a Chinese frigate locked its weapon-targeting radar on a Japanese navy vessel on January 30. China has angrily denied the charge.

Comments

jkhleung
It's interesting to see that the Americans are more Sino phobic than Nippon phobic. Japan, though ultimately defeated, was the country that went to war with America! And Japan is a nation with no shame. How can they continue to deny the atrocities wrought on the neighbouring countries? How can they not be batting an eye embracing the very nation that dropped two atomic bombs on its soil?
superdx
Without discussing the Japanese faults, which are many and well-documented, the actions from China these past months is achieving one very undeniable result: China is turning its previous neutral partners into US-friendly allies and now has encircled itself.
Whether it's a US master plan out of some CIA wonk or not, China's responses aren't making any new friends. And in the history of the world, encircled nations are the ones that ultimately lose.
pslhk
Did the US, supported by the UN, with its encircling power, win the Korean War?
Did China, never as isolated as it was in 1962, lose the India War?
Has Isreal, encircled as it is, ever lost a war?
If sovereignty is an unsettled issue and the Nips have initiated provocation,
would "neutral" partners side with the US because of China's proper response?
Who'd want that kind of "partners"?
All these questions apart, what would you propose for China's response?
Don't be the first prisoner of the Nips' propaganda war
that is aimed at arousing defeatist sentiments.
lauyukeung
The Chinese has made rightful claim of Diaoyu Island ever since the handing over of the administration right from the US in 1972. At a certain time both countries have agreed to resolve the dispute through negotiation but somehow suspended probably due to the prevailing cold war between the West and the communist camp then. The Japanese government recently bought the island from its private owner in order to legitimate its national ownership. To the Chinese government, this unilateral act is unscrupulous and is a form of bullying by the Japanese with the backing of the US. Now that the Japanese has used a set of PR tactics, such as the radar and smog incidents trying to discredit China and create a provocative image of the Chinese among international community. All the Chinese are watching these acts of the Japanese. Most of the Chinese (among the 1.3B) feel being bullied by the Japanese and developed unfriendliness and hatred against the Japanese, Chinese people naturally track their hatred back to WW2 time. They think that the Japanese are aggressive and not trust worthy as a nation. These hatred would last for generations among the people. Obviously these recent acts of the Japanese have caused very far reaching ill effects between the 2 countries which would take ages and ages to repair, or it would never be repaired.
ryszard.ewiak
This is not a wise step. The Bible says: "And [the king of the north] will go back (to) his land with great wealth [1945]; and his heart (will be) against the holy covenant [state atheism]; and will act [it means activity in the international arena]; and turned back to his own land [1991-1993. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact. Russian troops returned to their country]. At the appointed time [he] will return back." (Daniel 11:28, 29a) The return of Russia in this context means crisis, which will eclipse the Great Depression. Not only the eurozone will break up, but also the European Union and NATO. Then many countries of the former Eastern block will return to Russia's zone of influence. Russian troops will be stationed here again.
Russia, however, will not return everywhere. "And [the king of the north] will enter into the south [Georgia], but it will not be as the former [1921] or as the latter [2008], for the dwellers of coastlands of Kittim [the West] will come against him, and he will be dejected, and will go back." (Daniel 11:29b, 30a)
Moses writes: "But ships from the direction of Kittim [USN], and troubling Asshur [Russia] and troubling Eber [remaining enemies, including Iran and China]." (Numbers 24:24a)
This will be a nuclear war. (Revelation 6:4) "A great sword" in this context means a nuclear sword. As Jesus foretold, it will be "the beginning of birth pains". (Mathew 24:7, 8)

Login

SCMP.com Account

or