Chinese Parliamentary Sessions 2013
March 2013 sees the annual meeting of the two legislative and consultative bodies of China, where major policies are decided and key government officials appointed. The National People's Congress (NPC) is held in the Great Hall of the People in China's capital, Beijing, and with 2,987 members, is the largest parliament in the world. It gathers alongside the People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) whose members represent various groups of society.
Reform of energy policymaking less radical than expected
Ducking of move for a super-ministry raises doubts over plans for more power price reforms
The State Electricity Regulatory Commission (SERC) will be folded into the National Energy Administration (NEA), the State Council said, as it set aside a proposal for a more dramatic shake-up in the energy sector.
The move, which State Council Secretary General Ma Kai said would "better co-ordinate efforts to push forward the development and reform of the energy sector, and enhance its supervision and regulation", nonetheless stopped short of calls to group energy responsibilities under a dedicated ministry-level agency.
The newly expanded NEA will remain under the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), the top industry regulator and policymaker. It will be led by current SERC head Wu Xinxiong.
Current NEA chief Liu Tienan has been targeted for sacking, two people familiar with the restructuring said.
In December, an editor for Caijing Magazine, Luo Changping, said authorities were looking into irregularities under Liu, whom he accused of lying on his résumé as his family profited from his position. The NEA has denied the accusations.
It had been proposed five years ago to create a new cabinet-level Ministry of Energy to oversee the roughly 10 ministerial and sub-ministerial bodies and state-owned enterprises in the oil, coal and electricity industries.
Speculation about a new "super-ministry" was rife going into the National People's Congress, but aligning the various competing interests proved too difficult for Communist Party leaders. The final proposal leaves a question mark over stalled plans for more market-oriented energy prices, analysts said. The move had been sought to enhance efficiency in the power industry and reduce consumers prices.
Power prices are generally set by the state on a cost-plus-return basis at both the generation and distribution level. The SERC was set up as independent from the price-setting NDRC in 2002, tasked mainly with establishing and monitoring an electricity-trading mechanism between power generators and buyers.
But the effort stalled after a brief experiment with regional power trading. There was concern that consumer tariffs would become too volatile and cause unrest. Some also blamed a reluctance by power distribution monopolies to cede their influence over pricing.
"Given the SERC was the most active in pushing for power market reform, it is hard to see what lies ahead," said Lin Boqiang, the director of Xiamen University's Centre for China Energy Economics Research. "The new leadership may have new thoughts on the reform, but it may not be as bold as 10 years ago." Han Xiaoping, the chief executive of energy news portal China5e.com, said it was still possible an independent regulator could be created to monitor any electricity trading.