• Sat
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • Updated: 7:22am
Column
PUBLISHED : Monday, 24 June, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Monday, 24 June, 2013, 5:39am

Key questions never asked in graft probe of ex-railways chief Liu Zhijun

Length of probe into Liu Zhijun indicated scale of misdeeds, but murky details of a web of corruption were not clarified in swift trial

BIO

Wang Xiangwei took up the role of Editor-in-Chief in February 2012, responsible for the editorial direction and newsroom operations. He started his 20-year career at the China Daily, before moving to the UK, where he gained valuable experience at a number of news organisations, including the BBC Chinese Service. In 1993, he moved to Hong Kong and worked at the Eastern Express before joining the South China Morning Post in 1996 as our China Business Reporter. He was subsequently promoted to China Editor in 2000 and Deputy Editor in 2007, a position he held for four years prior to being promoted to his current position. Mr. Wang has a Masters degree in Journalism, and a Bachelors degree in English.
 

Former railways minister Liu Zhijun stood in a Beijing court on June 9 facing charges of bribery and abuse of power in one of the country's most sensational trials of recent years.

The court did not announce its verdict, but Liu faces life in prison or the death penalty.

Apparently, the authorities intend to come down hard on Liu to show its determination to fight corruption and salvage the reputation and image of China's trillion-yuan high-speed railway system. It went ahead in leaps and bounds under Liu but also was tarnished by safety concerns and mismanagement, particularly following the fatal crash that killed 40 passengers and injured more than 170 in Wenzhou in 2011.

Unfortunately, Liu's long investigation and trial have raised more important questions about the country's judicial system and anti-corruption efforts.

Liu disappeared from public view and was believed to be being dealt with by the Communist Party's anti-graft investigators since February 2011, before he was formally charged this month. The length of the investigation indicated the complexity and scale of his irregularities.

According to the indictment, he took advantage of his position and helped 11 people win promotions and contracts, and accepted 64.6 million yuan (HK$80.9 million) in bribes between 1986 and 2011.

But his trial lasted just 3-1/2 hours, including the reading of the indictment and arguments from prosecutors and defence lawyers.

The trial's brevity even shocked many mainland criminal lawyers accustomed to such summary proceedings. Some have openly wondered in state media if the trial was just a show and whether Liu received any real defence.

The pressure from their peers was so strong that Liu's two court-appointed lawyers were forced to defend themselves in long media interviews.

Those interviews, together with the indictment and the state media reports, have shed interesting light on how the prosecutors built the case and the loopholes that exist in the judicial system.

According to the indictment, Liu received 15.61 million yuan from 10 people, most of whom were former railways officials and Liu's close allies seeking promotions.

The remaining 49 million yuan came from a businesswoman named Ding Shumiao , the key beneficiary of Liu's abuse of power. At Liu's instruction, Ding used the money to bribe other officials in an attempt to clear another former senior official who was implicated in corruption in 2007. In the end, the official concerned was jailed for 14 years in 2009 for receiving 1.9 million yuan in bribes and failing to account for 3.97 million yuan in assets.

Liu's lawyers argued in the court that the 49 million yuan should not have been included in the charges against Liu as the money did not belong to him.

Interestingly, while the prosecutors admitted the 49 million yuan as part of the evidence, they excluded much larger amounts Ding spent or held for him.

According to state media, Ding spent 50 million yuan on a TV drama series based on the classic novel The Dream of Red Mansion and managed to get several of the actresses to sleep with Liu, prompting speculation that Ding financed the production with this in mind.

More importantly, Ding and her family made nearly 4 billion yuan on contracts on the high-speed railway network because of Liu's help.

Liu reportedly asked Ding to hold the 4 billion yuan for him as he wanted it to pay bribes for further career promotions. Before his downfall, Liu was already a powerful cabinet minister and a member of the party's central committee. It has made people shudder at the thought of what he had in mind - a Politburo member?

That also explains why he was able to rule the railways ministry for nearly 10 years despite much speculation that he was corrupt. According to the indictment, the charges against him covered a period of 25 years from 1986 to 2011.

How was he allowed to climb up and carry on for so long? Who were his protectors in the leadership and how much money did they receive?

Those are the interesting questions anti-graft investigators have never bothered to explore.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

4

This article is now closed to comments

chaz_hen
Wen. Jia bao. Jia qinglin. Jiang zemin. Li Peng. Hu Jintao. Xi jinping. Zhu rongji. Deng xiao ping. And the list of accomplices goes on...
jillangus
Hmmm... If all his accomplices were charges with him, I very much doubt if there would be anyone left in China to prosecute him or run the country.....
scmpbeijing1
Why are you surprised? Gu Kailai's trial, which involved corruption and murder, lasted less than 7 hours. Some political targets get just a few hours. This is standard in China where rule of law is a complete farce. And let's face it, the senior levels of the CCP are far more corrupt and rich than Liu Zhijun. I hope Mr. Wang Xiangwei will write a commentary about the excesses of the senior officials some day soon. But that's unlikely.
impala
Well, you didn't really think that The Party was going do its dirty laundry in public at full length?

Why would they? All that was needed was a nice little kangaroo trial to satisfy the public's desire for heads on silver platters. With that out of the way, they can all carry on lining their pockets as usual. Plus ça change...
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or