• Tue
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • Updated: 2:03pm
Apple
NewsChina
COURTS

Shanghai court hears claim that Apple's 'Siri' is copycat

Chinese technology firm argues that US giant's software infringed its patent

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 04 July, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Thursday, 04 July, 2013, 4:14am
 

A case against US technology giant Apple brought by a Chinese firm for alleged patent infringement in its digital personal assistant "Siri" has begun in a Shanghai court.

Lawyers representing Apple and Zhizhen Network Technology on Tuesday argued over the technical specifications of Siri and the Chinese company's "Xiao i Robot" product, state media reports said.

Trademark and patent infringement are rife in China, but the legal challenge to Apple comes after it paid Chinese computer maker Shenzhen Proview Technology US$60 million last year to settle a long-running dispute over the "iPad" name, whose ownership was claimed by both companies.

Zhizhen is demanding Apple stop making and selling products on the mainland which carry Siri, an "intelligent" personal assistant which responds to a user's commands through voice recognition software.

The firm claims it filed a patent for the "Xiao i Robot" software in 2004, which was approved two years later. Apple's Siri, which made its debut with the release of the iPhone 4S in 2011, was first developed in 2007.

In Tuesday's court session, Apple's lawyers argued that the two function in a similar way, but use different technology.

"One can achieve the same results through various means," a lawyer for Apple was quoted by the Global Times newspaper as saying. "Apple has its own technology for Siri, which is totally different from the plaintiff's."

Yuan Yang, a lawyer representing Zhizhen, said: "Our main goal at the current stage is to let the court validate our claim regarding the infringement.

"We are not ruling out the possibility of mediation or compensation, but they are to be considered in the future."

A statement by the Shanghai No1 Intermediate People's Court confirmed the session, which followed a pre-trial hearing in March. The court made no ruling on Tuesday.

 

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or