• Fri
  • Aug 29, 2014
  • Updated: 6:42pm

Diaoyu Islands

The Diaoyu Islands are a group of uninhabited islands located roughly due east of mainland China, northeast of Taiwan, west of Okinawa Island, and north of the southwestern end of the Ryukyu Islands. They are currently controlled by Japan, which calls them Senkaku Islands. Both China and Taiwan claim sovereignty over the islands. 


US backs Japan as tensions soar on Beijing's air defence zone over East China Sea

Beijing defence strategy is criticised by Japanese leader and ignites diplomatic tension across region

PUBLISHED : Monday, 25 November, 2013, 10:12am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 26 November, 2013, 1:54pm

Beijing's declaration of an air defence zone in the East China Sea kick-started a diplomatic free-for-all yesterday.

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe told parliament that Beijing's move "was a profoundly dangerous act that may cause unintended consequences".

He added: "Japan will ask China to restrain itself while we continue co-operating with the international community."

China and Japan each summoned the other's ambassador, while South Korea also waded into the row.

And he United States joined ally Japan in vowing not to recognise China’s declaration of an air defence zone, a move that escalated tensions even further.

The purpose of China’s approach is to defend national sovereignty

US President Barack Obama’s administration has vowed to defend Japan and said that the islands - known as the Senkakus in Japanese and the Diaoyus in Chinese - fall under the US security treaty with its ally, which has been officially pacifist since World War II.

“This announcement from the Chinese government was unnecessarily inflammatory,” White House deputy spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters aboard Air Force One.

“There are regional disputes in that part of the world and those disputes should be resolved diplomatically,” he said.

The US military, which stations more than 70,000 troops in Japan and South Korea, said it would not abide by the “destabilizing” Chinese-imposed zone.

“When we fly into this aerial zone, we will not register a flight plan, we will not identify our transponder, our radio frequency and our logo. Those are the four things the Chinese have publicly said are a requirement,” Pentagon spokesman Colonel Steve Warren told reporters.

“We will not in any way change how we conduct our operations as a result of this new policy,” he said.

Beijing announced on Saturday it had established an Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ).

It requires aircraft flying over an area of the East China Sea to comply with its orders. Tokyo called in Beijing's ambassador Cheng Yonghua and insisted the plan be withdrawn.

But the appeal received short shrift from Cheng, who said Tokyo should retract its "unreasonable demand".

Cheng's opposite number in Beijing was also carpeted and told that Japan should not make "irresponsible remarks" about the ADIZ.

China published co-ordinates for the zone at the weekend.

The worst scenario is a collision that could escalate into a larger-scale armed conflict if managed badly
Tetsuo Kotani, a research fellow at the Japan Institute of International Affairs

The area covers most of the East China Sea and the skies over the Diaoyu Islands - called the Senkakus in Japan - at the centre of a long-running row between Beijing and Tokyo.

The area also includes waters claimed by Taiwan and South Korea, which both expressed concern at the move.

South Korea's Defence Ministry said it would raise the issue with Beijing this week.

Part of the zone overlaps South Korea's own air defence zone and incorporates a disputed South Korean-controlled rock, known as Ieodo, which has long been a source of diplomatic tension with Beijing.

Defence Ministry spokesman Kim Min-seok said: "I would like to say once again that we have unchanging territorial control over Ieodo."

In Taipei, the government pledged to "defend its sovereignty over the archipelago".

Under the rules, aircraft are expected to provide their flight plan and clearly mark their nationality.

They are also expected to maintain two-way radio communication, allowing them to "respond in a timely and accurate manner" to inquiries, the Defence Ministry said in Beijing.

Observers said the zone raised the risk of a miscalculation or a crash that could quickly escalate into conflict.

François Godement, director of the Asia and China programme at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said it would fuel tensions with Tokyo over the Diaoyus.

"China [now] controls the rhythm of its escalation, since it can choose to enforce the ADIZ, or not to enforce it, or to enforce it selectively," Godement said.

Watch: China air defence zone to 'protect sovereignty': govt spokesman

Tetsuo Kotani, a research fellow at the Japan Institute of International Affairs, said Beijing's announcement could lead to a mounting crisis.

"If China implements this, it is likely that Japanese and Chinese fighters will frequently encounter in the overlapping zone.

"The worst scenario is a collision that could escalate into a larger-scale armed conflict if managed badly," Kotani said.

But scholar Liu Jiangyong , an expert in Sino-Japanese affairs at Tsinghua University, said the setting up of the air zone did not immediately translate into a looming conflict.

"I think media are overreacting," Liu said.

The Defence Ministry in Beijing said it had lodged formal protests with the US and Japanese embassies after they criticised the air defence zone.

The ministry said the criticism was unfounded and irresponsible. It also called on the US to stop taking sides in the row with Japan over the Diaoyus.

Defence Ministry spokesman Yang Yujun said: "We reiterate that the purpose of China's approach is to defend national sovereignty and territorial airspace security, maintain the order of airspace flight and is an effective exercise of our right of self-defence."

Strong words from all corners

The East China Sea dispute has simmered for decades but heated up in September last year when Japan nationalized three of the islands, in what it billed as an attempt to avoid a more inflammatory step by a nationalist politician.

Asia’s two largest economies now play an almost permanent game of cat and mouse in the area, with official ships and aircraft shadowing each other.

Newspapers in China, where Japan is often portrayed as the villain due to its occupation in the early 20th century, rejected Tokyo’s outrage.

“Tokyo is hypocritical and impudent in its complaint with Beijing,” said an editorial in the Global Times newspaper, which is close to China’s ruling Communist Party.

“If Japan sends warplanes to ‘intercept’ China’s jet fighters, Beijing’s armed forces will be bound to adopt defensive emergency measures,” it said.

Patrick Cronin, an expert on Asia at the Center for a New American Security, said that China was hoping to set off the “natural proclivities” of both the conservative Abe and the left-leaning Obama.

“China is taunting Japan to act in an incendiary manner while pressing the United States to exercise caution and restrain its ally,” Cronin wrote in an essay.

China, which has rapidly expanded its military as its economy soared over the past two decades, also has territorial feuds with other neighbours including the Philippines and Vietnam.

China’s declaration of the air zone angered South Korea, which has tense relations with Japan linked to historical memories and just days ago had upset Tokyo by cooperating with China to erect a statue of a Korean activist who assassinated a Japanese governor in 1909.

Part of the air zone overlaps South Korea’s own air defence area and incorporates a disputed, submerged South Korean-controlled rock - known as Ieodo - that has long been a sore point with Beijing.

Agence France-Presse, Reuters


Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

The historical legal Chines claims of SCS and DI:
1) In the Ming Dynasty ZhengHe laid claims to all of South China Seas however their mission was ambassadorial and trade; fancy had the Chinese populated the ASEAN all those years ago?
2) China's 1947's 11-dotted lines map of SCS, neither UN, USA, GB or the Security Council disapproved that. No Energy of resource interest was in play in the 1940s' so that was a second valid historical claim.
3) Diayu Islands + Okinawa were paying tribute the China since 1370s before any Honshu-based Shogunate laid claims on them.
Against the weight of history, restrain has been exercized by China which suggested aletrnatives to resolve the "disputes alleged by other ASEAN nations"
Hey, Zheng He's fleet had some wrecks off Kenya. They found Han DNA in some of that community with the Ming ceramics. Does China lay claim to Kenya too? If not, using the same logic as you propose above, why not? Can't explain away the flaws of your logic? Too far? If so, who set the distance limit on what Zheng He saw as an "ambassador" and does not claim for China? Talk about bait and switch. "We come in peace", then upon landing, "I declare your lands and all that it touches to be sole property of my Emperor". You see how me, a product of an analysis-based education system has far superior analytical abilities over you, a product of a rote-based education system? I can think instead of recite, you parrot. Come one, debate me. Kenya. Why ain't Kenya Chinese? The crew mated with Blacks, so China don't claim them anymore? That's so racist, which most of you are.
Everyone should realise how USA is hell-bent on controlling the world, starting with military and commercial domination, suggested reading/TV documentray is Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick's Untold History of the USA 2012, excellent POV on dereliction of much of the third world [Honduras, El Salvador, Chile, Argentina, Indonesia, Vietnam, Laos...] after makeovers courtesy of USA. It just tentalisingly missed out on what the USA is doing to dominate the world financial order by tweaking+making all the rules.
@Beaker: well if they cant see F-22s they arent gonna shoot them can they? that offers them deniability.. or the PLA can launch missiles from some tea/**** house, i heard they are pretty accurate :)
I think the JP public will eventually realize what kind of aholes they had elected into office..
Iamlm02, that F22 was just a head fake, like Lebron does before going opposite to slam another one in. You fell for the fake and still don't know it <wha..?>. The punch line is, if I have to explain it to you <one educated by rote memory without any analytical powers>, is the J10's just ran low on fuel because <haha> the jokers who drew that ADZ never thought of the range of the PLA-AF fighters. Wiki it, J10 has a combat range of 550 km. Measure out to the point at the far right (that's east). How far is it? Nobody had to fire a shot. Call that "over reach", literally.
well Mr.Einstein, the PLAAF doesnt hv to send any fighter to engage the yanks. whats the range of their missiles again? I heard they can reach US mainland quite easily.. the future air warfares are fought using UAVs and missiles.. the Chinese doesnt hv to spend millions training their pilots and hundreds of millions for 'stealthy' planes.. imagine the PLAAF dudes are having BJs in some whoe. hse while the yank pilots are fighting for their lives :)
Did the PLA think this through before declaring an air defense zone out to Okinawa? Do they know what we base there? F-22's. So, US or Japan fly a spy plane high and slow into the ADZ. China calls for declare. Spy plane does not recognize call as legitimate. Repeat. China scrambles J10's in a show of force. J-10's run low on fuel flying out to the eastern edge of the ADZ, must turn back. Big news all over the world except Xinhua and CCTV. Those with VPN's see the news.....Now what? That is China. Do first, then execute poorly. Then maybe think about wtf just happened?
no need to rage over it... just shoot them down!
Japan doesn't need F22 to take those junks off the sky... Strike Eagles will do just fine against those Mig copycats.
Perhaps the UN may be sent into administer a peace - a blessing in disguise?
Ancestral lands on the mainland confiscated by the CCP, should then be safely returned to the rightful owners as has been done with indigenous peoples in other parts of the world. If the people could be happy and at peace in their own land, what further can necessarily be gained in coveting the lands of others!
The very question is, who started this all? For over 30 years, since Deng Xiao Ping announced that the dispute over the Island should be left open to be solved by much more reasonable minds later in the remote future, the matter about the islands were forgotten in the shelves for decades. Then some Japanese right wingers started the argument with occupying the islands out of nothing and the issue became a hot and heated topic again. I just need to mention that it was at a time, were China and Japan came very close to an agreement on much more closer economic and financial cooperation including the direct RMB - Yen exchange. That must have scared some Americans...aeh, I mean some right wingers in Japan.




SCMP.com Account