• Wed
  • Sep 3, 2014
  • Updated: 9:35am

Beijing air pollution

The Chinese capital has for many years suffered from serious air pollution. Primary sources of pollutants include exhaust emission from Beijing's more than five million motor vehicles, coal burning in neighbouring regions, dust storms from the north and local construction dust. A particularly severe smog engulfed the city for weeks in early 2013, elevating public awareness to unprecedented levels and prompting the government to roll out emergency measures. 

NewsChina
POLLUTION

Cars or coal? Scientists split over main culprit of Beijing's air pollution

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 01 January, 2014, 12:52pm
UPDATED : Thursday, 02 January, 2014, 12:49pm

As China enters 2014 reeling from one of the worst polluted winters in recent years, experts from two major research institutes have openly disagreed over what is the main culprit behind the capital city's dismal air pollution.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the country's top research body, released a study on December 30 saying motor vehicle emissions were only responsible for less than 4 per cent of Beijing's PM2.5, the most health-threatening fine air pollutants. Instead, the study identified fossil fuel burning as the largest contributor of PM2.5, contrary to popular beliefs that the nearly 5.5 million cars clogging the capital's streets were chiefly to blame for its air pollution.

However, barely 24 hours later, Pan Tao, president of the Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, openly challenged the findings, telling People's Daily online that motor vehicle emissions were “undoubtedly” the major source of Beijing’s air pollution.

The CAS study analysed air samples in the capital on a seasonal basis, and found that pollutants generated from industrial production and coal-burning the source of Beijing's PM2.5 pollutants. According to the study, coal burning, industrial pollution and secondary inorganic aerosol, a catch-all term for inorganic particulates formed as a product of complex chemical reactions among pollutants, account respectively for 18 per cent, 25 per cent and 26 per cent of the air pollution at large.

Combined waste incineration and motor vehicle emissions are responsible for 4 per cent of the hazardous PM2.5 fine particles in Beijing's air, it says.

But the academy’s conclusion appears self-contradictory as motor vehicle emissions are themselves a major contributor to secondary inorganic aerosol, argued Pan Tao from the Beijing institute. Moreover, Pan asserted, it was simply impossible that car exhaust could account for as little as 4 per cent of Beijing's main air pollutants.

He cited studies done by other prestigious research institutes and universities, including Tsinghua and Peking universities, that found motor vehicle emissions to be responsible for 20 per cent to 30 per cent of Beijing's air pollution.

Pan also raised doubts over the research methodology used by the academy, which inferred sources of pollution based on composition analyses of PM2.5 samples, saying it is “indirect”.

According to his own institute’s study, Pan said, motor vehicle emissions were the largest source of Nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds (VOC), the two major pollutants that form PM2.5. Emissions account for 42 per cent of Beijing's total Nitrogen oxides and 32 per cent of its VOCs, he said.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

2

This article is now closed to comments

daily
It's probably a combination of both plus all the people in Beijing farting at the same time........
dunndavid
A few years ago 50% of Beijing's pollution was said to derive from outside of Beijing. With most Beijing power plants being moved outside of the city and others converted to gas that number is probably higher now. One report says 4% of Beijing's pollution derives from automobile, whereas another says the number is 20-30%. The 20-30% number seems improbable. A relatively small number of people get around automobiles. 20-30% of the total would mean the majority of Beijing derived pollution from a relative modest use base for automobiles. Politically though that number makes sense. Blaming Beijing pollution on automobiles is a way to shift the blame from the government (via state-owned enterprises) and on to the owner of automobiles. My guess is politics is the source of the "heated debate."
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or