• Tue
  • Dec 23, 2014
  • Updated: 9:01am

China memorial to Korean assassin sparks Japan row

PUBLISHED : Monday, 20 January, 2014, 12:37pm
UPDATED : Monday, 20 January, 2014, 1:03pm

A new Asian diplomatic row broke out on Monday after China unveiled a memorial to a Korean national hero who assassinated a Japanese official a century ago - with Tokyo condemning him as a “terrorist”.

In 1909, Ahn Jung-geun shot and killed Hirobumi Ito, Japan’s first prime minister and its top official in Japanese-occupied Korea, at the railway station in the northeast Chinese city of Harbin.

Ahn was hanged by Japanese forces the following year, when Korea also formally became a Japanese colony, heralding a brutal occupation that lasted until the end of the second world war in 1945.

A joint Chinese-South Korean memorial hall in Ahn’s honour was unveiled at the train station on Sunday.

Yoshihide Suga, Japan’s top government spokesman, said on Monday that Tokyo had conveyed its regret to Beijing and Seoul over the monument.

“We recognise Ahn Jung-geun as a terrorist who was sentenced to death for killing our country’s first prime minister,” Suga said.

“I cannot help saying that it is not contributing to building peace and cooperative relations in this region that South Korea and China took the joint cross-border move based on unilateral evaluation on a matter that happened in the previous century,” he added.

Political relations between China, Japan and South Korea - Asia’s first, second and fourth-largest economies - are heavily coloured by 20th-century history, when Tokyo’s imperial forces rampaged across the region.

Beijing and Tokyo are embroiled in a bitter row over disputed islands in the East China Sea, and tensions rose further last month when Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe visited a controversial shrine that honours Japan’s war dead, including indicted war criminals.

In an echo of Abe’s comments after his appearance at the Yasukuni shrine, Chinese and South Korean officials hailed the memorial to Ahn and contended that it was intended not to provoke a diplomatic row, but rather to promote peace.

We recognise Ahn Jung-geun as a terrorist who was sentenced to death for killing our country’s first prime minister
Japan government spokesman Yoshihide Suga

“People have cherished the memory of Ahn for the past century,” Sun Yao, the vice governor of China’s Heilongjiang province, said at the unveiling, according to China’s official Xinhua news agency.

“Today we erect a memorial to him and call on peace-loving people around the world to unite, resist invasions and oppose war.”

South Korea’s foreign ministry on Monday welcomed the opening, adding that Ahn was “a widely respected figure in both South Korea and China” and describing the assassination as a “courageous act”.

“We hope that the museum will offer an opportunity for northeast Asian countries to... set the path for genuine peace and cooperation based on correct historical awareness,” it said.

Ahn was posthumously awarded the Order of Merit for National Foundation in 1962, South Korea’s most prestigious civil decoration, for his efforts for Korean independence.

Every schoolchild learns his story from an early age - he has been the subject of movies, books, even musicals, and there are numerous statues and memorials to him across the country.

Bitter legacy

Japan’s occupation has left a bitter legacy in China and both Koreas, and Ahn remains a potent symbol - in July fans at an East Asia Cup football match between South Korea and Japan in Seoul unveiled a giant banner of his image.

Abe was the first sitting Japanese prime minister since 2006 to visit the controversial Yasukuni shrine, which honours several high-level officials executed for war crimes after the second world war and serves as a reminder of Japan’s 20th century aggression.

Abe insisted that he had “no intention at all to hurt the feelings of Chinese or South Korean people” and that the aim of his visit was “to pledge to create an era where people will never suffer from catastrophe in war”.

China has responded with a global public relations offensive against Abe, who was elected just over a year ago, with ambassadors in more than 30 countries penning articles condemning the move.

In a commentary on Sunday, Xinhua wrote that “the opening of Ahn’s memorial is not to inflict pain, but to shed light on the history of northeastern Asia”.

“History is the teacher of life,” the commentary continued. “Alarm bells shall not go unheeded. With Japan treading a dangerous path once again, the need for vigilance and a joint international effort is clear if we are to prevent a Japanese militarist resurgence.”


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

You've missed the point, this memorial is good for bringing SKorea and China closer, there's much political bang for the taxpayer buck; now a memorial for Tibetans rebels opposing Chinese rule would be a real waste of money....
Probably because Chinese and Korean sentiment regarding Japanese occupation are the same. The Japanese were BRUTAL -- like boiling people alive, like killing women by ramming objects into their private parts, like conducting human "experiments", i.e. "testing motherly love" by throwing mommy and baby into a fired pot to see whether mommy throws the baby under her feet -- BRUTAL. Forced prostitution and rape is only icing on the cake.
Too many Japanese, including their current Prime Minister, are still preaching that they never did such things. I say they deserve all the hate they're getting and more.
Many correctly-Japan-hating tourists will be visiting that monument and spending money in the process. Win-win for Korea and China.
Because then it can be a tourist attraction for every Korean to visit. A better investment of tax payer's money than most government buildings in China I would say.
This building of this memorial is bull***. There are certainly better ways to spend taxpayers money. Will similar memorials be built to honour Tibetans that oppose Chinese rule??
Why build a memorial in China, with Chinese taxpayers' money, to a foreigner who was fighting for the independence of his country? What did he do for China? The mere fact that the events happened in China, a third country in the conflict, doesn't seem to justify the construction.


SCMP.com Account