• Wed
  • Jul 23, 2014
  • Updated: 8:11am
NewsChina
DEFENCE

Soldiers of the one-child era: are they too weak to fulfill Beijing's military ambitions?

With 70pc of soldiers from one-child families, many wonder if they could cope on battlefield

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 05 February, 2014, 4:17pm
UPDATED : Thursday, 06 February, 2014, 4:29am

No one knows the real fighting capability of the People’s Liberation Army, but the fact that more than 70 per cent of China’s soldiers come from one-child families raises questions about how well prepared these troops would be for the horrors of battle.

“I was a spoiled boy as I am an only child. In my first year in the army, after a hard day’s training I’d hide under my blanket and cry every night because I missed home and my girlfriend,” Dalian native Sun Youpeng, who joined the  PLA after graduating from university at the age of 22 in 2010, told the South China Morning Post.

Past reports from the PLA Daily tell of recruits spitting red ink to feign sickness and escape the tough training.

The one-child policy has also stirred discussions among Japanese and South Korean media as tensions ratchet up over territorial disputes surrounding the Diaoyu Islands, or Senkakus as they are called in Japan. A report in the Korea Times in December proclaimed “the PLA would be defeated by Japan’s Self-Defence Forces if the Diaoyu conflict [happened] because most Chinese soldiers are spoiled little emperors and queens”.

Professor Liu Mingfu from the PLA National Defence University told Nanfang Weekly that at least 70 per cent of PLA soldiers were from one-child families, and the figure rises to 80 per cent among combat troops.

In an open report to the central government in 2012, Liu stressed that sending a Chinese family’s only son to battle had been taboo since ancient times. He pointed to the example of the US  military’s sole survivor policy, introduced after the five brothers of the Sullivan family were killed during the sinking of the cruiser USS Juneau in the Pacific during the second world war.

In Japan, military leaders have the responsibility to prevent sending eldest sons on high-risk missions, Liu added.

Antony Wong Dong  , a Macau-based military expert, said many mainland military officials and observers have voiced concerns about the impact of the one-child policy to China’s long-term  security since 1993.

“Under China’s strict military rules, deserters are shot on the spot, and even if only-child soldiers  are not afraid to fight, who will be responsible for their families if they die in battle or are severely wounded?” he said.

Sun, the Dalian soldier, said recruits usually need two years to adjust to life within a unit through tough routine training and psychological counselling.

Liu said the army had devised special training for “spoiled boys and girls” to strengthen its fighting capability in the past years, but the high rate of single children in the PLA was still a “strategic fear” for China’s long-term military development. The army has faced a serious lack of qualified manpower for at least a decade.

President Xi Jinping, who is also chairman of the Central Military Commission, told the third plenum of senior Communist Party leaders in November to relax the 30-year-long one-child policy by allowing couples in which one parent was a single child to have a second child.

However, Professor Ni Lexiong, a Shanghai-based military expert, said scrapping the birth control policy would not help the PLA solve its manpower issues for another two decades.

“The army needs to wait at least 20 years until all the second babies are young adults,” he said. “That means we can’t go to war without serious concerns.”

However, Scott Harold, a political scientist with the Rand Corporation think tank, didn’t think the one-child policy would lead to the failure of the PLA.

“Whether singletons or children from multi-child families, in wartime, a soldier fights to stay alive, and to keep his fellow soldiers alive – whether one has siblings or not,” he said, adding that the PLA’s hardware, logistics and command had steadily improved in the three decades since its border war with Vietnam in 1979.

“With some of the PLA’s most powerful abilities concerned with cyber attacks, anti-satellite warfare,  long-range precision conventional strikes and submarine warfare capabilities,  it is unclear to me how the fact that someone operating those systems is a single child would make much of a difference,” Harold said.

“I suspect corruption in the force plays a much greater role in sapping morale than the supposed concerns of a single-child-heavy force.” 

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

5

This article is now closed to comments

peye3515
Welll the only way to find out if the assumption are true is to have a war. All in favor say ,,,,,,,,,,,
newgalileo
I also have some doubts about the PLA, but more about the rampant poor morale and corruption. When you know how some lower-ranked soldiers are treated and how they have to be "nice" to their superiors to get anything done, you can have doubts. Overall, difficult to evaluate. High time the PLA cleans up its ranks.
raglan
"report in the Korea Times in December proclaimed “the PLA would be defeated by Japan’s Self-Defence Forces ..............”."
By that logic, the North Koreans would whip the South Koreans.....
XYZ
Mr. Harold's comments make sense; most of the others do not.
nmp_inc
The Korean paper conveniently forgot to mention that various younger generations of Japanese have been called parasite singles (and couples) in the past. And then you have the so called 'Strawberry generation' in Taiwan, and besides some generations on the mainland being known as 'little emperors and empresses' some are ALSO known as 'angry youth.' Really hope the South Korean military has better strategic understanding and planning capabilities than demonstrated in the Korean article; hopefully better than organizing a war based on blood types.
However, the bigger and more pertinent fact is that the 'horrors of war' are no longer evenly distributed (if they ever were). In today's high-tech, push-button, video game wars much of the killing is done from afar. You might be unlucky enough to have to view it through a video feed, but with the exception of grunts and special forces most of the killing is remote and detached. Perfect for the social alienated generations of today in every country. Sanitized war. (except for all the victims.)
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or