• Wed
  • Jul 23, 2014
  • Updated: 6:17am

Air Defence Identification Zone

The Air Defense Identification Zone is airspace over land or water in which the ready identification, location, and control of civil aircraft over land or water is required in the interest of national security. China's Defence Ministry announced its ADIZ over a vast area in the East China Sea on November 23, 2013, which covers the area around the Diaoyu islands, controlled by Japan and known as the Senkaku Islands. The establishment of this zone drew strong opposition from Japan, the US and South Korea, becoming a flashpoint in East Asian politics and security. 

NewsChina
MILITARY

Chances of war between China and Japan increasing, says ex-PLA officer Luo Yuan

Retired PLA general says China is ready and rejects claims of Japanese combat superiority, although some analysts are not convinced

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 02 April, 2014, 6:21pm
UPDATED : Thursday, 03 April, 2014, 5:00pm
 

Poll

  • Yes: 35%
  • No: 65%
3 Apr 2014
  • Yes
  • No
Total number of votes recorded: 1,127

A retired People's Liberation Army senior officer says a war with Japan over territorial disputes is becoming increasingly likely and that China is more than capable of defending itself.

Other military experts are not convinced the PLA would win any future conflict, despite China's military build-up and modernisation.

Some cite the PLA's lack of battle experience as well as technological weaknesses in certain areas, aircraft engines for example, that could hinder the PLA's fighting capability.

China and Japan moved closer to armed conflict after Beijing established its first air defence identification zone last November in the East China Sea to include the disputed Diaoyu islands, known as the Senkakus in Japan, Major General Luo Yuan said.

"China should remain in a high state of vigilance because Japan has a history of manufacturing small incidents to trigger military conflict," Luo said.

Luo, a vice-president of a Beijing-based think tank of retired military officers, the China Strategy Culture Promotion Association, dismissed suggestions in some Japanese media reports that the country had air combat superiority because its pilots and crews had greater experience and training.

"That conclusion is a deceptive tactic used by Japan to confuse the public," he said.

China has several military airports ... that could provide logistical support
Luo Yuan, retired PLA Major General

The PLA has deployed its most advanced aircraft and logistical support to military bases along China's southeast coast, a move designed to show that the army is prepared for any military conflict in the area.

"So far, all aircraft sent by both countries to the Diaoyu waters have been third-generation fighter jets. The PLA's newest and most advanced planes entered service at the turn of this century, including the J-10, J-11B and the [Russian-made] Su-27," said Luo.

"In contrast, Japan has deployed to the region only about 30 F-15Js, which their air force has used since the 1980s."

Luo declined to say how many fighter jets the PLA would mobilise in an armed conflict. He said China had an overwhelming advantage in the number and types of aircraft available.

"China has several military airports along the southeast coast that could provide effective logistical support to PLA fighter jets because those air force bases are much closer to the Diaoyus," he said.

"But in Japan, there is just one airport close to the Diaoyus: Naha airport in Okinawa."

Canada-based magazine Kanwa Asian Defence said the PLA's missile strategic force had deployed its S-300 long-range surface-to-air missile batteries at bases in Fujian since 2012.

Ni Lexiong , director of a defence policy research centre at the Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, said he was not convinced the PLA would have the upper hand in any conflict.

"It's a fact that China's logistical support near the Diaoyus is better than Japan's because military bases in Fujian and Zhejiang province have been ready for war with Taiwan since the 1950s," he said. "But we shouldn't ignore the Americans, who would play a decisive role in any armed conflict between China and Japan."

Luo argued the US would not intervene in any conflict.

Macau-based military observer Antony Wong Dong said that if hostilities did break out with Japan, all military bases and facilities on land and sea would be targets for bombing.

"China has more fighter jets than Japan, but one Japanese pilot is probably equivalent to at least three PLA pilots due to their intensive training and joint drills with the US air force," he said.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

69

This article is now closed to comments

53464ad6-7958-4f92-8c77-08e60a3209ca
i guess promoting war is one way for chinese generals to divert attention from their unexplained wealth by chinese authorities who are seriously chasing after corrupt PLA and communist party members.
mitchell.king.180
China doesn't stand a chance! They wouldn't even be able to beat the Russians. The Japanese are trained by the very best, meaning the US. Unless your pitiful starving army can swim to Japan you are stuck being nothing but targets. Want to use nukes? Yes China has enough nukes to hurt Japan and the US, but the US has enough to reduce the population of the earth by 1/4 in 30 minutes. Sorry China, wait another 100 years and maybe you can do it. For now just sit back, shut up and make more Chinese. You're going to need them if you go to war with Japan and the US.
SM ISAC
Funny to hear how China is able to "defend" itself when it is China who is being the aggressor. Their Propaganda Bureau is still in high gear.
raymondspchu
China reportedly has a handful of N bombs. Not enough! Increase the inventory to 20,000 and do not waste time bull shitting!
How About
ACT #8 (mid 2012)
.
BO : Thank you for the cheque Llyody, we really need it for the re-election.
.
TBTF : No sweat Mr. P, promise you won’t bring up arguments of Wall St Main St again? Jokinggg!
.
BO : Man, I thought the Haliburton bad-ss-s was tough but when you slammed the phone on Axelrod and Plouffe for presidential luncheon..
.
TBTF : Unlike those hawks we made trades not wars Mr. P, and to trade we need friends. Some of our biggest sponsors were really hurt when they heard some of things you said in 2009 after you approved TARP 3 about big bonuses and on raising corporate income tax. The Committee disapproved so we must appear to play hard ball with your campaign funding.
.
BO : You ‘re talking about the Committee of 300, the Olympians, who are they?
.
TBTF : You don’t ask questions like that or you end up shot in a gas station, POTUS or not!
.
BO : Anyway thanks, got to get back to the joint chiefs who motioned to ramp up provocation of the Chinese.
.
TBTF : Ahh those cowboys, they’ve been at it since Eisenhower, the Korean War, the Vietnam War the list go on!
.
BO : Very different today, we only use proxies - sugar Abe to go to Yasukuni, drop some candy to Aquino to build an outpost at Spratlys, get their knickers in a twist before we swoop in, that sort of thing.
.
TBTF : You got to stand up to them Mr. P.
.
BO : I did, they brought up JFK and black men in gas station!
.
TBTF = Too Big To Fail + Finance-Industrial Complex
.
ssgn1215l@gmail.com
Watch how an American says about the role US played in the Diaoyu Island debacle!
****www.youtube.com/watch?v=oscyMRdI9ZA
20140331 Diaoyu Islands the Truth Chris D Nebe
****www.womenofchina.cn/html/womenofchina/report/171651-1.htm
Documentary "Diaoyu Islands: The Truth" Offers Fresh Perspective
• March 26, 2014
• Editor: Yulanda Wang
ssgn1215l@gmail.com
Watch how an American says about the role US played in the Diaoyu Island debacle!
****www.youtube.com/watch?v=oscyMRdI9ZA
20140331 Diaoyu Islands the Truth Chris D Nebe
****www.womenofchina.cn/html/womenofchina/report/171651-1.htm
Documentary "Diaoyu Islands: The Truth" Offers Fresh Perspective
• March 26, 2014
• Editor: Yulanda Wang
auyeungy
a sinophile American chump
wiseman
What should you describe yourself then
ejmciii
The sad bit here is that if it happens it will come from the Chinese side. Hopefully China can contain themselves better than the Russians did.

Pages

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or