• Sat
  • Aug 30, 2014
  • Updated: 5:16am
Paracel Islands
NewsChina
MARITIME DISPUTE

Defiant China moves second oil rig closer to Vietnam, near three other drilling platforms

But Vietnam’s government is not expected to react strongly as it lies far north to the site of recent clashes

PUBLISHED : Friday, 20 June, 2014, 11:32am
UPDATED : Thursday, 17 July, 2014, 10:41am

China says it is moving a second oil rig closer to Vietnam’s coast, showing its determination to press its territorial claims and continue searching for resources in disputed waters despite a tense confrontation with Vietnam over another oil rig to the south.

The 600-metre-long rig is being towed southeast of its current position south of Hainan Island and will be in its new location closer to Vietnam by today, the Maritime Safety Administration said on its website. It asked vessels in the area to give it a wide berth.

Vietnam’s government is not expected to react strongly to the placement of the second rig because it lies far to the north of the politically sensitive waters surrounding the Paracel Islands, where ships from the two countries have been ramming each other for more than 40 days near the first oil rig.

China already has three oil rigs in the South China Sea which are reportedly being moved to new locations. Their presence highlights how Beijing has been stepping up its exploration for oil and gas in the tense region.

According to coordinates posted on the website of China’s Maritime Safety Administration, the Nanhai number 2 and 5 rigs will be in southern China and the Pratas islands, which are occupied by Taiwan. The Nanhai 4 rig is close to the Chinese coast.

The increase in oil rigs will inevitably jab a sensitive nerve for Vietnam and the Philippines,
Zhuang Guotu, expert

The agency, which did not say who owns the rigs, said all three would be in place by August 12. Moving such rigs is standard practice for the platforms which have been operating for years.

Earlier this week, the agency gave coordinates for the fourth rig, the Nanhai 9, which would be positioned just outside Vietnam’s exclusive economic zone by today.

The Global Times, a popular tabloid published by the Communist Party’s official People’s Daily, quoted Zhuang Guotu, director of the Centre for Southeast Asian Studies at Xiamen University, as calling the rig deployment a "strategic move".

"The increase in oil rigs will inevitably jab a sensitive nerve for Vietnam and the Philippines," Zhuang said.

China’s state oil behemoth CNOOC has said it had four new projects scheduled to come onstream in the western and eastern South China Sea in the second half of 2014.

It was unclear if the four rigs were part of those projects. A CNOOC spokesman declined to comment, but the company has long said that in a bid to boost production it wanted to explore in deeper waters off China.

CNOOC has said it would increase by up to a third its annual capital spending for 2014 to almost US$20 billion.

Protest in Vietnam

A Vietnamese Foreign Ministry official who spoke on normal condition of anonymity said Hanoi believes that no country should take unilateral action in contested waters, but that China has explored the area previously without causing a crisis in relations.

Vietnamese authorities broke up a small protest against the Chinese move yesterday. About a dozen people gathered at a park in central Hanoi and chanted slogans such as “Down with Chinese aggression” for several minutes before being dispersed. At least two protesters were taken away.

The shifting of the rig came as officials from both sides said they made no progress in talks on Wednesday over the deployment of the other Chinese rig on May 1 that sparked the current standoff.

Each country claims the Paracels as its territory and accuses the other of instigating the ship rammings around the rig.

The first rig’s deployment triggered anti-China demonstrations across Vietnam that led to attacks on hundreds of factories believed to employ Chinese workers, five of whom were killed and hundreds more injured. Many of the factories were built and run by investors from Taiwan, which has nothing to do with the current dispute.

China’s military expelled Vietnamese troops from two of the islands in the group in 1974, and in 1988 used force to kick Vietnam out of Johnson South reef in the Spratly Islands to the east.

The border between China and Vietnam in the area of the second rig near the mouth of the Tonkin Gulf has never been properly demarcated, despite five rounds of talks on the matter.

China claims virtually all of the South China Sea, which is rich in natural resources and crisscrossed by some of the world’s busiest sea lanes. That has brought it into dispute with other neighbours, including the Philippines, a US ally.

Vietnam and China held talks this week supposedly to help ease tensions over ship clashes near the Paracels and the first oil rig, platform 981. It had been operating 330 kilometres east of Vietnam and 370km from the southern coast of mainland island Hainan.

However, in a sign that the talks might make little progress, China's State Councillor Yang Jiechi told Hanoi to stop "hyping up" tensions over the oil rig.

It was the highest-level talks between the two countries since the oil rig deployment early last month caused a nosedive in relations.

The discussions were seen as an attempt to contain the worst diplomatic crisis between the ideological allies in decades. But analysts said Yang's sharp remarks indicated no progress was made during the one-day trip.

During a meeting with Yang, Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung urged China to withdraw the rig Haiyang 981 and told Yang that China's behaviour severely violated Vietnam's sovereignty and offended the Vietnamese people, according to the state-run Vietnam News Agency.

But in another meeting with Vietnamese Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Pham Binh Minh, Yang reiterated that oil rig 981 had been operating within an area of Chinese sovereignty

Yang said the current difficulty in the bilateral relationship was a result of Vietnam's "illegal disruptions", according to a summary of the meeting posted on the Chinese foreign ministry's website.

With additional reporting from Kristine Kwok and Reuters

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

11

This article is now closed to comments

jayb
i urge PEACE. no gun, no bullet. let's observe the principle of Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King.
A Kuro
If Vietnam can drill for oil in the South China Sea, so can China especially within her own territorial waters surrounding the Paracel and Spratly islands, which the Vietnamese government in 1958 recognise as being Chinese territory. Why don't the Vietnamese government tell the Vietnamese people the truth that in 1958 the Vietnamese government made an irrevocable acknowledgement under international law that the Paracel and Spratly islands is part of Chinese territory?
scmpcoolguy
A Kuro- in 1958, the PRC government issued a declaration of China's claim of 12 nautical mile limit territorial waters that encompassed the Spratly Islands. North Vietnam's Prime Minister at the time, Pham Van Dong wanted to stay on good terms with China (China at the time helped the North Vietnamese in fighting the Americans in South Vietnam). Prime Minister Pham sent a formal note to the then Chinese Prime Minister Zhou En Lai and recognised China's claims. The Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam) stated that it respects China's claims on the 12 nautical mile limit territorial waters around the Spratly Islands.
The Spratlys and Paracel Islands were conquered by Japan in 1939. Both sets of islands were handed back to the Republic of China (now Taiwan) at the end of WW2. The Republic of China then garrisoned Taiping Island on the Spratlys in 1946 and erected the ROC flag and makers on it. After the ROC retreated to Taiwan in 1949, they left the islands in 1950. In the same year, Phillippino Tomas Cloma uprooted the ROC flag and laid its claim over the Spratlys. In 1956, the ROC again re-garrisoned the Taiping Island of the Spratlys. In 1946, the Americans reminded the Philippinos that the Spratlys Islands were not Philippino territories at its independence, so as not the anger the Generalissimo Chiang Kai Shek of ROC and also as per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with the USA.
The North Vietnam govt is now the ruling govt of Vietnam, so China's claim is valid
ejmciii
It seems that they disagree that it is China's territory as does the Philippines. No agreement by a nation is irrevocable. Think about the contracts that the Communists refused to honor when they took power in Russia and China. Think about China's aggression in dealing with HK even though the lands of HK Island and Kowloon were sold to the British. Pathetic.
536f3b1f-2ff4-460f-a039-35030a320969
Vietnamese Gorverment ? No I don't think so - In that period there are two Goverment - one in the north & one in the south - Which gorverment control the Paracel and Spratly during that period ? Please don't to be stupid like that . Try to read more.
oxymoron19
There are people in higher places pulling the strings and Xi Jinping is nowhere near the apex of the hierarchy. The reason for the tensions in the South China Sea is politically and meticulously instigated by generals in the military for the purpose to flex muscles and enamored their countrymen to gain power, status and control not only to the regions but inside China. Whatever is behind that eastern Iron Curtain is a Pandora box and there is much more sinister going on than mere air space and island domination. Stop for a second and think outside of the box beyond what you read or hear from the media. There is definitely a conspiracy theory.
lib_prc

Since China / Vietnam did not agree their divorce terms, the best way is to go back together as one single country...
ejmciii
So you are ready for China to surrender sovereignty of the entire nation to Vietnam? OK.
XYZ
Peaceful rise, anyone? Bueller? Anyone?
michaelhctam@gmail.com
It is a peaceful rise, China is using international law and the United Nations to get what she wants. Unlike the West that has absolutely no qualms in bombing, enslaving or installing puppet governments.

Pages

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or